One of my hobbies is reading a paper until I find a statement that is seems obviously false to me

    > mathematicians can derive new knowledge by reasoning from axioms without external information

But their entire section on paradoxes is full of what appears to be nonsense to me b/c I have actually studied the listed topics. They're sweeping too many assumption under the rug & I am confident the rest of the paper is not going to resolve any of the issues I noticed.