frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

US oil giant ExxonMobil says Venezuela is 'uninvestable'

https://www.ft.com/content/4c21c031-443e-4834-a7a6-3dd59672b54e
1•petethomas•1m ago•0 comments

Landlords are using automated services to monitor tenant promotions

https://old.reddit.com/r/shitrentals/comments/1q38sh4/if_you_get_promoted_at_work_keep_it_a_secre...
1•xyzal•2m ago•0 comments

HackLikeMe – AI DevSecOps CLI with 6 specialized agents that think before acting

1•abrarnasirj•6m ago•0 comments

Feedly Is Down

https://x.com/i/trending/2009815486377214014
2•ksec•9m ago•1 comments

Go 1.26 Interactive Tour

https://antonz.org/go-1-26/
3•nnx•11m ago•0 comments

Phosh 2025 in Retrospect

https://phosh.mobi/posts/phosh-2025-in-retrospect/
2•todsacerdoti•24m ago•0 comments

Parents Are Going Broke from Their Kids' Sushi Obsession

https://www.wsj.com/lifestyle/parenting-food-diet-kids-sushi-8ff64063
1•kdazzle•25m ago•1 comments

EU countries have approved the Mercosur trade deal after 25 years of talks

https://www.politico.eu/article/eu-countries-approve-mercosur-trade-deal-for-signature/
3•paulpauper•28m ago•4 comments

Betterment users phished with real but unauthorized messages

https://www.reddit.com/u/bettermenthq/s/QaU43KrF4t
1•Ozzie_osman•28m ago•0 comments

Show HN: FeedPod – Convert your RSS feeds to personalized podcasts

https://feedpod.io/
1•thatloststudent•39m ago•0 comments

Deep sequence models tend to memorize geometrically; it is unclear why

https://arxiv.org/abs/2510.26745
1•erhuve•52m ago•0 comments

Show HN: CloudMasters – one TUI to rule them all, rent VPS from 58000 prices

https://github.com/BrowserBox/CloudMasters-Marketplace
1•keepamovin•55m ago•3 comments

The Incidence of Tariffs: Rates and Reality [pdf]

https://bfi.uchicago.edu/wp-content/uploads/2025/12/BFI_WP_2025-151.pdf
1•neehao•59m ago•0 comments

CDC staff 'blindsided' as child vaccine schedule unilaterally overhauled

https://www.unmc.edu/healthsecurity/transmission/2026/01/07/cdc-staff-blindsided-as-child-vaccine...
3•stopbulying•1h ago•0 comments

Anthropic cut off xAI's Claude access in Cursor

https://twitter.com/kyliebytes/status/2009686466746822731
3•meetpateltech•1h ago•0 comments

UN chief says US has 'legal obligation' to fund agencies after Trump withdrawal

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/un-chief-says-the-u-s-has-legal-obligation-to-fund-agencies-af...
2•stopbulying•1h ago•2 comments

Private Inference

https://confer.to/blog/2026/01/private-inference/
2•vishnukvmd•1h ago•0 comments

Bash by the Numbers

https://mckern.sh/post/bash-by-the-numbers/
2•thunderbong•1h ago•0 comments

Some first thoughts about live immersive basketball

https://sixcolors.com/post/2026/01/some-first-thoughts-about-live-immersive-basketball/
2•coloneltcb•1h ago•0 comments

Where's the $100k iPhone?

https://boydkane.com/essays/100k-iphone
1•zdw•1h ago•0 comments

MIT Non-AI License

6•dumindunuwan•1h ago•4 comments

Show HN: Understand the Picture of the Day

https://picture.learntosolveit.com
1•orsenthil•1h ago•0 comments

Haraltd – A cross-platform Bluetooth daemon with a JSON-based RPC

https://github.com/bluetuith-org/haraltd
1•darkhz•1h ago•0 comments

The Stick in the Stream

https://randsinrepose.com/archives/the-stick-in-the-stream/
1•zdw•1h ago•0 comments

MAKERphone 2: first modular DIY phone, no soldering

https://circuitmess.com/products/makerphone-2-0
2•nateb2022•1h ago•0 comments

Sodium-ion battery cells near lithium-ion cost parity, set to get cheaper

https://www.ess-news.com/2026/01/09/sodium-ion-battery-cells-already-near-lithium-ion-cost-parity...
1•toomuchtodo•1h ago•1 comments

OpenAI to Buy Pinterest? Strategic Analysis

https://nekuda.substack.com/p/openai-to-buy-pinterest-heres-what
1•gmays•1h ago•0 comments

Vajra BM25 is a fast BM25 implementation in Python

https://twitter.com/aiexplorations/status/2009846407881212136
1•aiexplorations•1h ago•1 comments

Show HN: A website to save moments that remind you of someone

https://thisremindedme.com/
1•Winggo•1h ago•0 comments

Google and chatbot startup Character move to settle teen suicide lawsuits

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2026/01/07/google-character-settle-lawsuits-suicide/
1•1vuio0pswjnm7•1h ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Show HN: Rocket Launch and Orbit Simulator

https://www.donutthejedi.com/
116•donutthejedi•10h ago
I (17y/o) have been developing a rocket launch simulation that allows the user to explore what it's like launching a rocket from earth and putting it into orbit. This idea originally started as an educational simulation but as i've gone more down the rabbit hole the more i've wanted to make it realistic. The problem is that I've never had a formal orbital mechanics class or anything like that so I don't know what I'm missing, what I currently have implemented is:

  Variable gravity
  Variable Atmospheric drag (US Standard Atmosphere 1976)
  Multi-stage rockets
  Closed-loop guidance / pitch programs (works well within ranges 350km to 600km)
  Orbital prediction and thrusting options to change your orbit.
The feedback I'm looking for is: UI improvements and possible future physics implementations that I can work on.

Current code and physics can be found at: https://github.com/donutTheJedi/Rocket-Launch-Simulation

Comments

tgig•10h ago
Did you do all the math yourself?
donutthejedi•10h ago
yup, derived most of the equations myself then double checked them before implementing them. That being said all of the positining is done through time steps and not so much equations
seabass-labrax•8h ago
Nice work! Had a "blast" playing it ;)
mstank•10h ago
This is awesome, great work! There’s a huge audience for something like this based on the popularity of Kerbal Space Program.

Biggest low-hanging fruit UI improvement would be mobile responsiveness. It was a bit challenging testing on my phone.

donutthejedi•10h ago
Awesome, thanks alot, thats a great idea to work on
brookman64k•10h ago
Why is it launching with a horizontal velocity? It initially moves to the right even when pointing up perfectly.
donutthejedi•10h ago
Thats due to the rotation of the earth, for the purposes of the simulation the earth is rotating at 408 m/s (earths rotation at cape canaveral) so thats why It appears its going sideways
DetroitThrow•10h ago
But the rotational velocity of the rocket is going to be very similar to Earth's at the launch site. Eventually the rotational velocity between ground and the rocket will begin to noticeably differ, but the launch trajectory starting at 408 m/s would look terrifying if it were that way in real life.
donutthejedi•10h ago
Good point, I implemented that very early and hadn't really thought about it, let me look into the true solution, thanks
donutthejedi•10h ago
I found the problem, It appears that I had the earth staying stationary but gave its rotational velocity to the rocket, What i think needs to happen is I need to also be rotating the earth so the inertial frame stays the same. Thanks for bringing this up
sfblah•10h ago
I was able to fiddle with the settings so it launches in the air a bit and then hits the city. All by just going vertically. Pretty funny.
mholt•10h ago
Don't rockets also start with the same horizontal velocity though, since nothing canceled it out when it got off the launch pad?

It would be like jumping, and finding yourself ~250-400 meters away from where you lept by the time you landed.

That said, neat project, and way fun learning experience. Good job.

brookman64k•10h ago
When the rocket launches it already moves with earth's rotation at that latitude (and is stationary with respect to the ground). That's in fact the reason why many rocket launch sites are near the equator: Free velocity.
arnonejoe•9h ago
Looks super awesome. Strong work! It showed the karman line at 98-99km. Maybe a tiny tweak needed.
fartfeatures•9h ago
Much better than KSP2
headcanon•9h ago
I'm sure that city just *loves* being downrange of the launch site :)

JK, nicely done! lots of fun to watch.

TeMPOraL•9h ago
Fortunately for it, that city is mounted on some antigrav sled and moves around to always stay ahead of the launch vehicle, safe from my totally not intentional attempts at crashing into it.

Completely unrelated bug: pitch control can go down only to -5 degrees.

donutthejedi•8h ago
Took the anti grav sleds off, might be possible to crash into now idk
Teever•9h ago
This is really neat.

I've been toying with the idea of building something similiar but with a bunch of different space stuff, like a calculator for different rotating space station geometries, mars/lunar cycler orbits, or solar shade sizes/distances.

It's been many years since I've done this kind of stuff in school and it's great to be able to refresh yourself on this stuff. The kind of UI you're using makes it really friendly and approachable, like a game.

caetris24•8h ago
I think it's a good start, but the user experience and the color theme make the simulation cumbersome to absorb. Maybe you can do a theming exercise with an AI. The zoom feature is highly sensitive. It's not intuitive at first on what the user should do or take away from the simulation. The events feature is great, and essential.

Looking forward to seeing the next iteration. Nice work.

MeetingsBrowser•7h ago
This is really neat and pretty fun to play around with!

How accurate are the simulations? I'm able to get orbit by turning 45 degrees as soon as I launch and then doing some minor burns at the height of the initial trajectory.

I don't feel like this strategy would work in real life.

GalaxyNova•7h ago
I think it would, given that there is no air resistance.
donutthejedi•7h ago
Its fairly accurate as far as I can tell. Your right about the fact that It wouldnt work in real life due to the dynamic pressure your exerting on your rocket, using your method you get to about 150 kPa, Falcon 9 usually maxes out around 35 kPa so it would explode. Also it is a fairly fuel inneficent way of getting into orbit, but yes it is possible
Intralexical•6h ago
Subtracting gravity losses, the largest effect of your 45 degree thrust vector would be sideways acceleration. Which is generally what you want, to get up to speed as quickly as possible, instead of wasting energy ascending vertically.

We just don't do it on Earth because we need to get out of the atmosphere first for efficiency and structural reasons. But on the moon or another vacuum body, "diagonal kick followed by minor circularization burns at apogee" is pretty close to the optimal strategy. Even on Earth, it's similar to the trajectories proposed by SpinLaunch and other "space cannon" concepts.

zamadatix•7h ago
How much AI was used vs manual lines?
donutthejedi•7h ago
Around 90% AI for syntax, I did alot of debugging manually. For implementing new features I would design them and do the reasearch then have a AI write lines for me and verify the work
zamadatix•4h ago
It's a quick path to having something to play with but I'd encourage folks specifically wanting to learn something new or create something for a portfolio to try to have it be more the other way around: write 90% by hand, implement the features yourself, and have AI help you with the research and debugging (but not try to automatically write the code to fix the bugs). AI is really great at all of the things listed, but I guarantee if you were in an interview and someone asked you about this project your responses about how and why everything works would be 2x-3x stronger.

If this was your 3rd time implementing an orbit simulator and you just wanted to get the bulk done quick so you could move on to work on new stuff then that's when having AI write the bulk & doing checking really works best as you're already an expert in what needs to be done rather than trying to learn about what needs to be done from someone/something else doing it for you.

I say this as an orbital dynamics simulator in C++ having been one of my first big projects I put in a portfolio myself :). And I also like to use AI often, I'm not an AI hater in general, just I like to use in certain specific ways sometimes.

Feedback on the UI side: It'd be cool if the stars used more random positions rather than sine/cosine looking patterns. There are lots of different approaches one could try (from simple random positions to very complex types of clustered randomness and brightness variation to realistic star maps). My suggestion would be to ask AI what types of approaches could be taken and try implementing whichever approach sounds the most fun!

shireham•3h ago
Curious what age bracket you’re in? I understand where you’re coming from, but I don’t think it will be the paradigm for the future. My own experience is that you actually learn a lot by having AI write piecemeal code and then do overall review.
tgig•1h ago
He is 17
donutthejedi•2h ago
I completely agree with what your saying, with one caveat. If I understand how the underlying physics and dynamics are working but don't know how to write the code then theres no world where I could make something like this. The way that I see it is that AI is a tool that really depends on the person.

If I were to be someone who just tells AI "implement drag" and lets it do it then sure, im not learning, but if I do my research outside and just use AI to translate what I give it into the language of computers I feel like im not only building something cool but im understanding whats happening because AI is just translating.

So basically while yes I do believe that AI can be harmful if you approach it inproperly, it helps novice programers implement cool things by just using english.

pwndByDeath•4h ago
This breaks my heart, software modeling orbital mechanics is something I do for fun from time to time.
MadnessASAP•4h ago
What did you use for closed loop guidance? If you aren't aware of it NASA has a lovely paper called UPFG "Unified Powered Flight Guidance" [1] used for the space shuttle. This was implemented and made more universal for KSP (of course) by Przemysław "Noiredd" Dolata as PEGAS "Powered Explicit Guidance Ascent System" [2]

If it's your thing you could try implementing it and getting a single continuous burn to final orbit.

Awesome work BTW!

[1] https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740004402

[2] https://github.com/Noiredd/PEGAS

Edit: I now see it's on your roadmap, so I guess it is your thing.

lamontcg•2h ago
I've got another kos-PEG implementation here as well, along with a really extensive bibliography:

https://github.com/lamont-granquist/KSP-KOS-PEG/blob/main/li...

donutthejedi•1h ago
For this model I kinda just made up my own system to play around with it, while it wasn't very effective it was pretty fun. That being said thanks a lot for the recommendations, I wasn't very aware of the options I had for it.