I kind of agree with you - up until the point that ICE started just shooting people in the face with zero consequences (and please don’t trot out the self-defence BS).

Let’s try your comment in 1938 Germany. Replace the word ICE with Gestapo.

On the contrary, this is exactly the sort of thing a prototypical hacker would do: give a massive finger to the authorities through the use of technology.

two wrongs don't make it right but just to document that ICE has been using their facial scan and plate scan apps meant to determine immigration status on non-violent protestors and then following them home (or even more creepy, leading them to the protestor's home) and calling them out by full name and details

https://www.mprnews.org/story/2026/01/13/ice-using-private-d...

I'd settle for the middle-ground law enforcement can't wear masks and cover their agency/badge number (or use fake plates)

Extreme powers has to come with extreme responsibility, they are heavily armed and also using their cars to ram people on purpose, they don't have to follow rules because they know no-one knows who they are

"And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If... if... We didn’t love freedom enough." --Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, Gulag Archipelago

We learn from history. These people don't get to terrorize our communities without pushback; no amount of finger-wagging will change this. (To be clear, I do not advocate violence, death threats, etc. But their little cosplay masks will not protect their anonymity. Let their friends and neighbors find out who they really are -- maybe they will feel shame for once.)

Are you really bothsidings this? Really?

> Sure, if some bad actors can be sued/prosecuted

And if they can’t be?

I’m not in favor of doxing.

But let’s be clear, it’s not a few bad apples. ICE by design is operating outside the law.

The videos are endless, people outside their homes on a walk questioned and threatened with arrest if they do not produce ID, face scanned and so on:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Minneapolis/comments/1qbawlr/minnea...

They’ve blocked off whole neighborhoods going door to door questioning people.

Let alone the videos of drive by pepper spray, drawing their weapons on people, shoving people to the ground…

These aren’t one off events. This is everyday in Minneapolis.

Doxxing extra-legal operatives is moral.

When the policing and justice system fails the people, mob rule is (sadly, imperfectly, but obviously) the only means of redress.

Successful, prolonged mob rule is called "revolution", and considered completely legitimate, ironically.

I read that during the irish occupation, irish policemen (so, working for the british governement) were rejected and isolated socially, treated as traitors to their people.

Which led them to eventually refuse to continue oppressing their people for money, the revolution, independance, all that.

I kinda see connections, don't you ?

No, you need to expose them for many reasons, accountability, make it harder for them to join. You questioning this makes me think you agree with their tacticts, and it has been extremely obvious that organization is a total mess of rule breaking.

> What purpose does this serve other than to incite violence?

Does this mean you imagine them beyond the law?

Fascism, contrary to many people's usage, has an actual meaning that is not "things I don't like".

One definition:

"Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian political ideology centered on a powerful dictator, extreme nationalism, and the nation's interests above the individual, suppressing opposition through force, propaganda, and control over society, business, and labor, often promoting militarism and a strong, unified national identity."

Note that "citizens doxxing government actors" is not in any way an ingredient of fascism.

A tolerant society cannot tolerate intolerence, lest it gets destroyed by it.

You cannot give anything to fascists, we know what they do, history is there, they didn't change, they're doing exactly the same thing.