"[...] resulted in 6 stash houses being identified"
"[resulted in the] identification of 135 stash houses"
"692 apprehensions"
Collab with FBI, USBP...
etc., etc.
I don't see how this is supposed to look bad for ICE. It actually makes them look good.
It is also the "their violence is staggering" and "they operations have no respect to law" and "they actually intentionally terrorize citizens too" parts.
All mentioned in article and well documented at this point.
It seems that critics oppose the law itself, but then frame the argument as “ICE is bad because it breaks the law,” rather than acknowledging that the real disagreement is over whether those laws should exist at all.
The reality being that one informs the other. I know people that would agree in regular situations that we need some enforcement of immigration law. But this is not a regular situation, and when you have an agency tasked with 'enforcing' immigration law who is not enforcing the law at all and in fact violating the law, people question why said immigration laws and agency exists in the first place.
stevenalowe•1h ago
krapp•1h ago
fzeroracer•42m ago