I’d love your feedback — and if you have, thank you for being part of the journey!
I’d love your feedback — and if you have, thank you for being part of the journey!
I am curious to try it but do not want to adopt MCP servers.
Telling Claude to call the CLI tool is more efficient.
You have every ability to make these modifications yourself; is there a reason you feel the need to require the creator to do so?
I want to figure out how to build advanced tools, potentially by leveraging Lemons to iterate quickly, that allow us all to rely _less_ on Lemons, but still get 10,20,30x efficiency gains when building software, without needing to battle the ethics of it all.
Eg authenticatedMenu() appears 4 times in authenticatedMenu.js, only one of them is imported by 2 different files and 3 are just there alone. There's a single export in the file and a number of other files import it through an index.js that re-exports several files other files too.
In my case I think it'd help, if I could disable the duplicates as they don't really provide any useful information when exploring the codebase.
Also, if there was optionally a way to ignore the files that re-export functions/classes and collapse those paths, it'd make the graph a lot smaller and more easy to understand. Maybe it's already something that depgraph does, but the duplicates confuse things, so I'm not sure.
I think so too. I guess that's how your project is structured and duplicates maybe inevitable.
The graph shows exactly how the project is organized. Right - "duplicates confuse things" - this would suggest eliminating "files that re-export functions/classes" or passing an option (-i) for ignoring specific paths would help. Otherwise, this issue is noted for further analysis.
Thanks for trying depgraph.
Is there a prompt special sauce y’all use to get it to use it?
dogman123•2w ago
esafak•2w ago
strainer_spoon•1w ago