No-one has credibly accused Grok of making CSAM, surely?
By definition CSAM is a record of real abuse, so cannot be generated by a data centre. Sexual deepfaking children is not the same thing.
In the United States, the PROTECT Act of 2003 made significant changes to the law regarding virtual child pornography. Any realistic appearing computer generated depiction that is indistinguishable from a depiction of an actual minor in sexual situations or engaging in sexual acts is illegal under 18 U.S.C. § 2252A.
Your source does not say that. Your source says only that it illegal. Illegal does not make it CSAM.
bigyabai•2w ago
I recommend taking matters into your own hands and ignoring X altogether. It's what I do, and my enjoyment of life is not significantly diminished as a result. Same goes for the rest of Big Tech, but I'll let you reach those conclusions naturally.
chrisjj•2w ago
Sure there is: report it.
> I recommend taking matters into your own hands and ignoring X altogether.
Ignoring it is the opposite of taking matters into your own hands.