Don't get me wrong, I somewhat agree that there's been a sea change with Opus 4.5 in the usefulness of Claude Code, but it stills goes off the rails at the drop of a hat in the dumbest and most frustrating ways. Actually trying to use it to develop even a nontrivial greenfield project from scratch requires carefully reviewing its code to make sure it stays on track.
We're less than a calendar year away from AGI and ignorant luddites still want to pretend the entire world hasn't shifted under their feet.
Genuinely confused here.
Note: Figma was just an example of the complex software.
Why even generate an image then. Why don I just use dribbble / behance and pick the best design
Even hardcore top level engineer wont be able to do it just via LLMs
Most of the recent completely vibe coded projects dont do anything as complex as that, they are usually just tiny websites or some slop tui
I have used all major tools: OpenAI (chat, api), Google Gemini (ai studio, api, cli, antigravity) and Claude (chat, code and api). Mostly for coding issues to solve.
Claude Code gives usable results almost instantly for small scripts and it can live. Gemini CLI tells me that it doesn't have this and that - I have tried pushing Gemini to deliver production-quality code. No chance.
I use the same style of coding instructions for all tools.
But difference is in hours. I had a Claude session - result was in minutes, Gemini - hour and in many rounds.
On the other side, Gemini Canvas is really powerful as it makes usable app/tool inside Gemini so you don’t have to know how to run Python or PHP.
And OpenAI has very powerful chat.
So all of them seem to have different focus groups…
But for your use-case, I would think Gemini cli is better, since gemini does seem to excel in Data Analytics tasks for me.
I would like to direct the author to a high school statistics class.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correlation_does_not_imply_cau...
skybrian•45m ago