personally - and maybe I'm biased, I prefer the expert approach.
The multi-agent approach lets you scope each agent to what it knows best. Backend agent stays in /api, knows the DB schema cold. Frontend agent lives in /web, knows the component library.
When they need to coordinate, they message each other with just the relevant context - not the entire codebase.
It's also useful for parallel work. Both agents can be coding simultaneously instead of one waiting for the other.
Good work.
glad you enjoy it.
maorbril•2w ago
When my backend agent finished an API endpoint, I'd have to manually tell the frontend agent. Copy-paste the schema. Explain the types. Re-establish context. Every. Single. Time.
So I built Clauder. Run `clauder wrap` instead of `claude` and your instances discover each other automatically.
The killer feature: real-time messaging between agents. Backend finishes an endpoint, sends "GET /users ready, returns paginated JSON" - frontend agent gets notified instantly and starts building the React Query hook. No copy-paste. They just coordinate.
How it works: - MCP server that runs locally - Agents auto-register when they start - Messages delivered in real-time via polling - Also has persistent memory (facts survive across sessions)
Quick start:
Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Windsurf, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI.All local, SQLite storage, MIT licensed.
What multi-agent workflows would you use this for?