Then there's also the thing that the DNS record for their company points to this individual (not the company). So then this individual gets the lawsuit. I wouldn't be sure that Namecheap is at fault here.
To read the other half of the story -
https://nitter.net/loganflatt/status/2014805148611076530#m
> Basically, you need to rebrand due to trademark infringement but you haven't done it.
https://nitter.net/pkj__m/status/2014888969989980167#m
> courts are asking you to stop serving thejuggernaut.com for people located in India. And I am able to open it just fine while sitting in Delhi... Is there some context missing here? Seems more like a case of compliance than bullying.
https://nitter.net/pkj__m/status/2014896455002255705#m
> arent these things you should take up with the court and get them to rule in your favor? End of the day the court ordered geoblock in India and that's all that matters
https://nitter.net/namecheapceo123/status/201489917915212236...
> Shameless lies by her. Read 22.
> 22. Defendant No. 4 - NameCheap, Inc. is directed to disclose the details of the Registrant of the Defendants' domain name and is directed to block the domain name 'www.thejuggernaut.com' till the next date.
I am all for outrage against big corporates but what do we expect from Namecheap here? Do we want Namecheap to defy a direct court order?
madars•1h ago
https://xcancel.com/snigdhasur/status/2014747997943238791
https://nitter.poast.org/snigdhasur/status/20147479979432387...