If you’re running autonomous or semi-autonomous agents that:
call paid APIs
purchase data
invoke metered tools
chain actions without human approval
…how are you handling payments and limits?
What I mostly see in the wild are workarounds:
provider-level API keys with hard usage caps
proxy services that re-bill later
framework-specific hacks living in side branches
alert-only or manual approval modes
or simply not letting agents spend directly
None of these feel like a clean abstraction, especially once agents make thousands of micro-decisions.
The hard part doesn’t seem to be “moving money,” but delegating spending authority safely:
how much
on what
under what conditions
and how to revoke or audit it
Frameworks understandably avoid this, but that leaves every team reinventing the same fragile patterns.
So I’m genuinely asking:
How are you handling this today?
What breaks or feels uncomfortable?
Is this problem still premature, or already painful for you?
Would love to hear concrete setups — even if the answer is “we punted on it.”
storystarling•1w ago
The architecture that finally worked was treating every agent action as a transaction against a Redis counter. We use Celery for the heavy lifting, but the worker has to acquire a lock and deduct credits atomically from Redis before it can even call the external provider. If the balance hits zero, the task fails immediately. It adds a bit of latency but it’s the only way I found to prevent a runaway loop from draining the credit card.
ArielBarack•1w ago
Did you keep “credits” purely internal, or do you reconcile them back to real invoices/costs per provider?
Any edge cases you hit around retries/idempotency (e.g., task retries after deduct, provider call succeeds but worker crashes, etc.)?