> "We can’t completely vacate the client market," said Zinsner, but Intel is "shifting as much as we can over to data center to meet the high demand."
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/01/core-ultra-series-3-...
So many smart best things going on on PL. Xe3 GPU looks amazing, especially the 12 core one. I love the extra low power core on the soc chiplet, allowing the main CPU chiplet to post down. Intel's EIMB is great, such an advanced interconnect for low power multi-chip. 18a and backside power. Excellent stuff!
Hard to blame them though for abandoning consumer market, like is happening with the entire rest of the computing market. Why make cores if the rest of the computer is too ghastly expensive to afford?
tiffanyh•1w ago
And it only wins in multi-core simply because it has 16-cores while the M5 base only has 10-cores.
When Apple launches the M5 Pro and/or Ultra this won't be the case.
orev•1w ago
tucnak•1w ago
bryanlarsen•1w ago
hulitu•1w ago
bryanlarsen•1w ago
Obviously if you're gaming you get less, but the 22 hours that Intel claims and the 22 hours that Apple claims should be roughly comparable.
alecco•1w ago
14-inch MacBook Pro M5 with 24GB $1,999.
Intel is -35% price, +60% cores, and most importantly given the 4x prices +33% RAM.
And you can run Windows games and Linux on it.
BugsJustFindMe•1w ago
bryanlarsen•1w ago
prewett•1w ago
2OEH8eoCRo0•1w ago
brian_herman•1w ago
2OEH8eoCRo0•1w ago
DerArzt•1w ago
izacus•1w ago
andrewmcwatters•1w ago
I don’t really care how many hours their laptops last compared to Windows and Linux machines anymore.
I can’t put a price on user freedom. Even if I could, it’s far from negligible.
Apple has chipped away for years at user freedom. It’s an entire tooling and infrastructural development built from intentional strategy. Not a marginal price difference.
Billions of dollars were invested in removing our ability to do common tasks.
thefz•1w ago