One thing that stuck with me from a recent podcast conversation: the biggest value of AI in healthcare isn’t automation, it’s continuity.
Between appointments, people disappear. They say “I’m fine” when they’re not. Traditional surveys flatten complex human stories into numbers.
AI, when used carefully, can listen to people in their own words and give providers context, not decisions, at exactly the moments when intervention matters most.
The insight wasn’t “AI replaces clinicians,” but rather that AI works best as a signal amplifier, not a decision-maker.
Where do you think the line should be drawn between AI assistance and human judgment?
vitlyoshin•1h ago
Between appointments, people disappear. They say “I’m fine” when they’re not. Traditional surveys flatten complex human stories into numbers.
AI, when used carefully, can listen to people in their own words and give providers context, not decisions, at exactly the moments when intervention matters most.
The insight wasn’t “AI replaces clinicians,” but rather that AI works best as a signal amplifier, not a decision-maker.
Where do you think the line should be drawn between AI assistance and human judgment?