I’ve seen plans fail that were technically solid. Clear goals, reasonable timelines, capable people and full agreement in the room.
Yet execution slowed weeks later. Not loudly. Quietly.
What I eventually realized was missing wasn’t alignment or process. It was confidence. People had agreed, but they didn’t fully believe the plan would work. After decisions are made, doubt rarely gets voiced. It feels late, political or unproductive. That doubt goes underground and shows up later as hesitation, delay or quiet disengagement.
I’m a solo maker and built a very small experiment to surface that signal early, essentially a lightweight confidence check before execution. I’m less interested in the tool itself and more curious about the practice.
How do you handle this? Do you explicitly check confidence before committing?
Or do you rely on signals that appear during execution?
Would appreciate perspectives from people who’ve lived this.
1970-01-01•1h ago
Confidence is trust. It needs to be built and earned. Have those small successes done before starting the bigger job or you're starting with low confidence.
anticlickwise•1h ago
Yet execution slowed weeks later. Not loudly. Quietly.
What I eventually realized was missing wasn’t alignment or process. It was confidence. People had agreed, but they didn’t fully believe the plan would work. After decisions are made, doubt rarely gets voiced. It feels late, political or unproductive. That doubt goes underground and shows up later as hesitation, delay or quiet disengagement.
I’m a solo maker and built a very small experiment to surface that signal early, essentially a lightweight confidence check before execution. I’m less interested in the tool itself and more curious about the practice.
How do you handle this? Do you explicitly check confidence before committing?
Or do you rely on signals that appear during execution?
Would appreciate perspectives from people who’ve lived this.
1970-01-01•1h ago