I built UnIQum because most "real-time" scanners are actually snapshot-based with a ~5s latency. In arbitrage, 5-second-old data is dead data.
Worse, existing tools often show "paper profit" while ignoring execution reality. We focus on what actually matters for a successful trade.
Why UnIQum is different:
True Real-Time: ~40ms internal processing via WebSockets (vs standard polling).
Execution Safety: Automatically checks deposit/withdraw status and network alignment to prevent stuck funds.
Smart Sizing: Calculates the optimal trade volume based on real order book depth to minimize slippage.
Deep Data: Funding Rates & Delta-Neutral strategies included out of the box.
I’m looking for feedback on performance and suggestions: what specific risk metrics or features are you missing in current tools?
xetokky•1h ago
I built UnIQum because most "real-time" scanners are actually snapshot-based with a ~5s latency. In arbitrage, 5-second-old data is dead data.
Worse, existing tools often show "paper profit" while ignoring execution reality. We focus on what actually matters for a successful trade.
Why UnIQum is different:
True Real-Time: ~40ms internal processing via WebSockets (vs standard polling).
Execution Safety: Automatically checks deposit/withdraw status and network alignment to prevent stuck funds.
Smart Sizing: Calculates the optimal trade volume based on real order book depth to minimize slippage.
Deep Data: Funding Rates & Delta-Neutral strategies included out of the box.
I’m looking for feedback on performance and suggestions: what specific risk metrics or features are you missing in current tools?