frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The Missing Layer

https://yagmin.com/blog/the-missing-layer/
2•lubujackson•2m ago•0 comments

In Defence of GnuPG: Key Sovereignty in an Age of Digital Feudalism [video]

https://fosdem.org/2026/schedule/event/WHHWGT-in-defence-of-gnupg/
1•m3rcury•3m ago•0 comments

A developers' job is to reduce ambiguity

https://old.reddit.com/r/ExperiencedDevs/comments/1qq8y8u/comment/o2f1f0b/
1•abrbhat•10m ago•0 comments

Why Replacing Developers with AI Is Going Horribly Wrong? [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WfjGZCuxl-U
1•wg0•10m ago•0 comments

Sazabi Manifesto

https://www.sazabi.com/manifesto
1•puppion•12m ago•0 comments

I've created a tool to make your Discord server indexable on Google and AI

2•jackota•13m ago•1 comments

DAiFi Whitepaper Released: A New Era of Decentralized AI Finance

https://www.daifi.ai/blog/daifi-whitepaper-released
1•whatsupdog•16m ago•1 comments

Show HN: LocalCoder – Tell it your hardware, get the exact local AI model to run

https://localcoder.xyz
1•JoseOSAF•16m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Replacing NotNull and Preconditions with fluent Java assertions

https://github.com/Sympol/pure-assert
1•symplice•18m ago•0 comments

Ads are coming to AI. But not to Claude

https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2019071113741906403
1•johnjames87•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Ikka – A noise-free, AI-powered news aggregator for Zimbabwe

https://www.ikka.cloud/
1•mugamuga•23m ago•0 comments

AAsk HN: Best GitHub API ingestion without tripping secondary rate limits?

https://openclawskills.best/
1•cutecatarya•23m ago•1 comments

ArXiv future proofs access to research with third-party digital preservation

https://blog.arxiv.org/2026/02/03/arxiv-future-proofs-access-to-research-with-third-party-digital...
2•gslin•24m ago•0 comments

A Wargame Shows Just How Vulnerable Europe Is to a Russian Attack

https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/a-wargame-shows-just-how-vulnerable-europe-is-to-a-russian-attac...
1•JumpCrisscross•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Blaeckfetch – Minimal system fetch with retro console-style splash mode

https://github.com/gustafeden/blaeckfetch
1•gustafeden•27m ago•0 comments

Validation is the bottleneck. Not code gen

https://www.kerno.io/blog/ai-dlc-for-startup
1•karimtr•27m ago•0 comments

Russia used Starlink in drones; SpaceX's cutoff collapsed command system

https://euromaidanpress.com/2026/02/05/russia-used-starlink-in-strike-drones-that-reached-kyiv-sp...
3•c420•28m ago•1 comments

Justice.gov JEE files contains bash manual

https://framapiaf.org/@bitecode/116014584956841267
7•sametmax•29m ago•0 comments

Watch Claude Code iteratively improve its reference bitnet NN implementation [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tbAkySCXyp0
1•logicallee•30m ago•1 comments

Curl install Python CLI tools without dealing with Python

https://uvx.sh/
1•sametmax•30m ago•0 comments

Claude says ads are coming to AI but not to Claude

https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2019071113741906403/mediaViewer
2•phanimahesh•32m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Claude Code Skill for Scaffolding Arbitrum Stylus and Solidity DApps

https://github.com/hummusonrails/arbitrum-dapp-skill
1•bcgreenberg•33m ago•1 comments

Test management tools for automation heavy teams

1•Divyakurian•33m ago•0 comments

Pandoc in the Browser

https://pandoc.org/app/
2•ravenical•33m ago•0 comments

You can find the bash manual in the Epstein files

https://bsky.app/profile/bitecode.dev/post/3me2uffilyc2h
2•BiteCode_dev•35m ago•0 comments

Computers Can Be Understood

https://blog.nelhage.com/post/computers-can-be-understood/
1•sebg•37m ago•0 comments

Show HN: StatCalc – Statistical Calculator with Clear Visualizations

https://echomoltinsson.github.io/statcalc/
1•onyx_writes•38m ago•0 comments

Factory 95: A Retro-Windows inspired automation game about making PowerPoints

https://bsky.app/profile/liamflannery.bsky.social/post/3m7lilxuyz225
2•mariuz•38m ago•0 comments

FTSE 100 Live: Trillion-dollar tech sell-off rocks global markets

https://www.cityam.com/ftse-100-live-tech-sell-off-ai-trillion-bank-of-england-interest-rate-cut-...
1•user20180120•41m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pit – Git for LLM prompts (332 tests, 10 features)

https://github.com/itisrmk/pit
1•rahulrmk•41m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

QuitGPT – OpenAI Execs Are Trump's Biggest Donors

https://quitgpt.org/
13•robin_reala•1h ago

Comments

simianwords•1h ago
I think this is the direct consequence of the left being anti business. From Sam's previous writings, it doesn't seem like he was or is a huge Trump fan.
ahoka•1h ago
There's practically no "left" in the US.
simianwords•1h ago
why wouldn't you consider AOC / Bernie the left?
jjav•1h ago
Two out of 535 easily meets the definition of "practically none".

And maybe a few more, so maybe around 1%

WithinReason•33m ago
Can you vote for them?
rapsey•1h ago
You are just playing a word game. The democrats are the left in the political arena of the US. If they are not what the left would be in some other country or what someone thinks the left should be is meaningless.
rapsey•1h ago
The left also specifically turned against AI, big tech and data center build out. They would be crazy not to go all in on the republican party just like Elon did.
EU4EA•1h ago
After visiting the page and reading it, it’s clear that Brockman’s $25 million contribution is the statement contribution.
simianwords•1h ago
Not sure what you mean - Brockman and Sam are practically the same ideologically.
piva00•50m ago
Why use the loaded term anti-business when very, very few on the "left" of the USA are actually anti-business-commies-socialise-everything?

From my perspective at most there are attempts to curtail business practices untethered to any morality, which should be a net-positive for society. A completely theoretical pro-business political body would remove any and all obstacles to business: environmental regulations, labour protection, taxation, financial oversight, so on and so forth, I believe we can agree that such move would be detrimental to society at large while making businesses extremely rich, right?

The shift of framing that any attempt to curtail the bad downsides/externalities of untethered capitalism is being "anti-business" is either ignorant, misleading, or purely furthering an agenda. There's no way for capitalism to survive without oversight, its incentives are to minmax on a race to the bottom on anything possible that could give a business an edge, without rules around that the benefits of such a system are completely eroded, you create social fractures that are reflected into politics, exactly what's been happening in the USA even before Trump 1.

Perhaps this aggressive stance on being pro-business is part of the issue, and pursuing it above all else has steadily shown that society at large doesn't improve even though it fosters consumption, assets inflation, and the key economic metrics used to sell this idea.

While this stance is pursued the political power keeps getting accumulated into the hands of an elite detached from reality, uncaring for any social aspect since there's absolutely no moral incentive to think about the social contract when you can live in an ivory tower with the scales tilted to your favour, and among others like you who also don't care about any aspect that can make the life in society better for all. Improvements to society at large are coincidental, not intentional.

Capitalism is amoral, we need mechanisms that imbue some morality to it to avoid social fractures, the core issue is finding that line to balance, and which keeps shifting and needs iterative processes to rebalance when needed. The extremist version of pro-business-nothing-else-matters is clearly not the way you find a balance on anything, like any extremism it's almost by definition wrong when meeting reality.

rapsey•29m ago
> A completely theoretical pro-business political body would remove any and all obstacles to business: environmental regulations, labour protection, taxation, financial oversight, so on and so forth, I believe we can agree that such move would be detrimental to society at large while making businesses extremely rich, right?

This assumes that all obstacles and regulations are to the benefit of the environment and people and that the regulation results in intended consequences.

In modern western countries regulation is very often ideological and actively harms the populace and economy. Case in point Germany and their green and anti nuclear hysteria, which resulted in total reliance on coal.

piva00•25m ago
Which is why I exactly pointed out that "finding the line" should be a iterative process, it's just natural the pendulum will swing for correcting past mistakes.

I don't know why you assumed I'm stating as if finding where these regulations lie to be a static thing, I thought I left a lot of nuance so this tired line wouldn't be played against the core of my argument... I didn't assume the current regulations are perfect, nor that there can be a perfect line, but that the process of finding this should exist, and that the answer will never lie in either extreme.

Hope it's even clearer now.

Edit: and also, "ideological" is a non-sequitur, even the criticism of it as you've done is ideological in nature...

msejas•1h ago
I believe also a big factor that it is way easier to convince Trump that AI is a matter of national security, and to use geopolitical tools (NVIDIA GPU ban on China) to secure their market position as much as possible, and to make it more palatable to the public their corporate bailouts.
throwawaysleep•1h ago
What I don't understand is why the Democrats don't just come out hard against AI at this point. It is unpopular and the tech titans are openly Republicans.
rapsey•1h ago
The tech titans are openly republicans because the democrats kicked them out.
oytis•33m ago
Who kicked out whom? I might be missing some context here, to me it were tech bosses who turned to Trump after he won or after it was clear he was about to win.