Anyone else uncomfortable with this new BBC boilerplate?
The reporter cannot know. Might be wrong. Possibly the appearence does.
Clearly his goal is to disclaim accusation.
But why not stick with e.g. "does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing"?.
Anyone else uncomfortable with this new BBC boilerplate?
The reporter cannot know. Might be wrong. Possibly the appearence does.
Clearly his goal is to disclaim accusation.
But why not stick with e.g. "does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing"?.
davydm•1h ago
for instance, you will find Stephen Colbert's name in there - because an email sent between two of epstein's buddies included a line where the author thought that epstein would enjoy Colbert's show
so his name is in the files, and he really has nothing to do with it - and I bet there's a lot more, considering the sources of the files
davydm•1h ago