I might pay $120 a year to GH copilot. I won't pay $2000/month to claude no matter how much hype their users claim, on principle.
I might pay $120 a year to GH copilot. I won't pay $2000/month to claude no matter how much hype their users claim, on principle.
It’s never been easier to make your own software. You don’t even need to know how to program. You don’t even need to buy an operating system. You need like $200 for a shitty laptop. People doing good and interesting work aren't reliant on these agents. People writing these posts aren’t outputting good software — let alone any software anyone actually cares about. Where’s the billion dollar game franchise written mostly by Claude? It doesn’t exist.
I don't think it's going to be anything like 50% or even 30% of users using non-flagship hardware or software products. But it could still be significant. And I think the more important thing isn't going to be market share as much as proof of viability. More successful examples will beget more.
It's about planting seeds from which future digital ecosystems can grow -- that have interoperability, functionality, and openness built into their foundations.
I believe that what drove you to make this post and the way I feel is not unique and are part of a larger swell in similar sentiments.
You throw in other factors too like the mass tech layoffs and the continued doubling down of tech barons on their cravings to intermingle with the surveillance state and military industrial complex... I just can't see how the future doesn't have more people disillusioned with the current state of the tech industry.
I think big tech will continue to overplay their hand and the mess that comes after will be an opportunity to give people what they want and show alternatives to what's already been done that we know won't work out.
vdupras•1h ago
If the tools you use are cheaper, shouldn't it make you more competitive? If the expensive tools are worth it, wouldn't it mean that you can jack your price? Where's the problem?