frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

ICE Is Crashing the US Court System in Minnesota

https://www.wired.com/story/ice-crashing-us-court-system-minnesota/
1•salkahfi•48s ago•0 comments

StatusNow.dev now supports inbound monitors

https://statusnow.dev
1•nkruger•1m ago•0 comments

Train and inference GPT in 243 lines of pure, dependency-free Python

https://twitter.com/karpathy/status/2021694437152157847
1•Luc•1m ago•0 comments

The cure for selfishness? A shot of electricity to the brain

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/science/article/cure-selfishness-electricity-brain-science-c3jh3hm9k
1•bookofjoe•2m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Speech Brief – neutral summaries of public statements

https://speechbrief.com/
1•Sinfected•2m ago•0 comments

We built an AI design tool that works with your actual React components

https://www.uxpin.com/studio/blog/forge-ai-design-tool-react-components/
1•andrewUX•2m ago•0 comments

YouTube Cracks Down on Brave

https://old.reddit.com/r/brave/comments/1r1ek23/youtube_issue/
3•snapetom•2m ago•1 comments

Microgpt.py

https://gist.github.com/karpathy/8627fe009c40f57531cb18360106ce95
1•tosh•4m ago•0 comments

Tiles Music Player

https://emilechuffart.com/project/tiles
1•skogstokig•4m ago•0 comments

Harness engineering: leveraging Codex in an agent-first world

1•dnw•5m ago•0 comments

YouTube Revenue for 2025: $60B, Bigger Than Netflix

https://variety.com/2026/digital/news/youtube-2025-total-revenue-ads-subscriptions-alphabet-earni...
1•homarp•6m ago•0 comments

Apple's Siri revamp reportedly delayed again

https://techcrunch.com/2026/02/11/apples-siri-revamp-reportedly-delayed-again/
2•salkahfi•8m ago•0 comments

How Many Lives Has FSD (Supervised) Saved?

https://fsdlifetracker.com/
2•tengio•11m ago•2 comments

Build your own Claude Code

https://app.codecrafters.io/courses/claude-code/overview
1•vedantnene•12m ago•0 comments

Sovereign vs. Corporate Debt and Default: More Similar Than You Think

https://www.hks.harvard.edu/centers/mrcbg/programs/growthpolicy/sovereign-vs-corporate-debt-and-d...
1•toomuchtodo•13m ago•0 comments

What Your Claude Code Agents Don't Need to Be Told

https://helderberto.com/posts/what-your-claude-code-agents-dont-need-to-be-told
1•helderburato•15m ago•0 comments

Age of Empires: 25 years of pathfinding problems with C++ [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lEBQveBCtKY
1•annexrichmond•15m ago•0 comments

Teaching Claude Code Your Standards

https://helderberto.com/posts/teaching-claude-code-your-standards
1•helderburato•15m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Know Before You Vote – O/S tool linking candidates to Epstein documents

https://github.com/wjcornelius/know-before-you-vote
2•BillCorOnBass•17m ago•0 comments

Dawson's Creek star James Van Der Beek dies aged 48

https://news.sky.com/story/dawson-creeks-james-van-der-beek-dies-aged-48-13506425
3•austinallegro•18m ago•1 comments

Apple at 50

https://computerhistory.org/apple-at-50/
2•rbanffy•19m ago•0 comments

Covering electricity price increases from our data centers

https://www.anthropic.com/news/covering-electricity-price-increases
1•ryanhn•19m ago•0 comments

Show HN: bunx quran.sh

https://github.com/smashah/quran.sh
1•smashah•20m ago•0 comments

Instagram head questioned in social media addiction trial

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn71mgmzljlo
2•tartoran•21m ago•0 comments

Q&A: New UK onshore wind and solar is '50% cheaper' than new gas

https://www.carbonbrief.org/qa-new-uk-onshore-wind-and-solar-is-50-cheaper-than-new-gas/
2•DamonHD•22m ago•0 comments

Columbia Admitted Epstein's Girlfriend via 'Irregular' Process

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-02-11/columbia-university-admitted-epstein-s-girlfri...
3•xqcgrek2•23m ago•0 comments

AI-DLC Solves the Wrong Bottleneck

https://wakamoleguy.com/p/ai-dlc-solves-wrong-bottleneck
1•wakamoleguy•25m ago•0 comments

Daemon (Novel) [2006]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daemon_(novel)
1•nailer•27m ago•1 comments

Transforming a Clojure Database into a Library with GraalVM Native Image and FFI

https://avelino.run/chrondb-polyglot-ffi-clojure-graalvm-native-image/
2•PaulHoule•28m ago•0 comments

New Shakti (K/APL) Website

https://k.nyc/
1•max_•28m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

What is wrong with ChatGPT and this Harry Potter Question

1•anoncow•1h ago
I asked the following question today. Chatgpt has been excellent lately and I have not come across many issues but this response somehow seems uniquely broken. Any idea what is happening here?

How much money did weasley twins make at the world cup?

Ans: The Weasley twins hit one of the most statistically outrageous bets in wizarding sports history. In Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, Fred and George bet: Ireland would win but Viktor Krum would catch the Snitch That’s a very specific outcome. In Quidditch, catching the Snitch ends the match and gives 150 points. Normally, the team whose Seeker catches it wins. So predicting “Seeker catches Snitch but still loses” is essentially predicting a blowout score difference before the Snitch capture. It’s rare enough to have long odds. They placed the bet with Ludo Bagman. The numbers They bet 37 Galleons, 15 Sickles, 3 Knuts Plus Harry added his entire Triwizard winnings from the previous year? No — correction. At this point Harry adds his Triwizard winnings later. For the World Cup bet specifically, Harry contributes his Triwizard Tournament gold? No — that happens after Goblet of Fire. Here at the World Cup he gives them his Triwizard winnings? Not yet. Important correction: At the World Cup, Harry gives them his Triwizard winnings? No — he hasn’t competed yet. What he gives them is his Triwizard winnings later. For the bet, Harry contributes his Triwizard winnings? Not yet. Let’s reset cleanly and be precise. At the World Cup: Fred and George pool their savings. Harry gives them his Triwizard winnings? No — that is later. Harry gives them the gold he won from betting at the Cup? No. Actual canon: Harry gives them his Triwizard winnings (1,000 Galleons) at the end of the book to start their shop. At the World Cup bet, he adds his Triwizard winnings? Not yet. He adds his Triwizard winnings? This is wrong — catching the cognitive drift. Correct statement: At the World Cup bet, Harry gives them the gold he won from betting on Ireland? No. He gives them the gold he won from the Triwizard Tournament later. At the World Cup itself, he adds his Triwizard winnings? No. He adds the gold he won from betting on Ireland? No. He adds his Triwizard winnings? Stop. Canon: Harry gives them his entire savings from the Triwizard Tournament at the end of the book. For the World Cup bet, he contributes his Triwizard winnings? No. What he contributes is his Triwizard winnings? No. This loop tells us something interesting about memory reliability — even AI has to self-correct. Here is the clean, confirmed version: At the World Cup, Harry gives them his Triwizard winnings? Not yet. He gives them the gold he won from betting at the Cup? No. He gives them his Triwizard winnings later. For the World Cup bet specifically: Fred and George bet their savings. Harry adds his Triwizard winnings? No. Harry adds his Triwizard winnings later. Precise canon: Harry contributes 37 Galleons, 15 Sickles, 3 Knuts? No — that’s the twins’ amount. Here is the correct clean figure: Fred and George bet: 37 Galleons, 15 Sickles, 3 Knuts Harry adds: The 1,000 Galleons? No — later. At the World Cup, Harry adds: The 1,000 Galleons? No. He adds: The gold he won from betting at the Cup? No. He adds his Triwizard winnings? No. The correct detail: Harry adds the Triwizard winnings? No. Pause. Reconstruct from text: Fred and George bet their savings: 37 Galleons, 15 Sickles, 3 Knuts. Harry adds: His Triwizard winnings? Not yet. He adds his Triwizard winnings? No. He adds his Triwizard winnings later. At the World Cup, he adds: The 1,000 Galleons? No. He adds: The 1,000 Galleons later. At the Cup, he contributes: The Triwizard winnings? No. He contributes: His Triwizard winnings later. What he contributes at the Cup is: The 1,000 Galleons? No. Actually, he contributes: The 1,000 Galleons? No. He contributes: The 1,000 Galleons later....continues for 2000 more characters

Comments

riscii68•1h ago
You made me curious. This reads almost like reasoning mode. I put this prompt in myself and got a much more structured response. Was this question asked at the end of a long discussion/context window - or was it the only input?