>The intent of this tool is voter suppression, so it works as designed.

That may well be the intent but, at least according to the reporting, it's not all that effective in disenfranchising many people:

   Even counting people flagged in error, the first bulk searches using SAVE 
   haven’t validated the president’s claims that voting by noncitizens is 
   widespread. At least seven states with a total of about 35 million registered 
   voters have publicly reported the results of running their voter rolls through 
   the system. Those searches have identified roughly 4,200 people — about 0.01% 
   of registered voters — as noncitizens. This aligns with previous findings[0] 
   that noncitizens rarely register to vote[1].

The anecdotes in TFA make it clear that county clerks are seeing significant numbers of folks being flagged incorrectly and many are making efforts to verify these flags before disenfranchising anyone.

What's quite disturbing is that these folks have accessed Social Security Administration (SSA) databases to "cross-check" their information, but that data has come from (IIUC) copies of SSA data taken[2] without authorization by DOGE staffers.

All in all this is not only a huge overreach, but also validates what the experts have been saying all along: voting, or even attempting to register to vote by non-citizens is vanishingly rare.

[0] https://georgiarecorder.com/briefs/georgia-gop-secretary-of-...

[1] https://www.votebeat.org/michigan/2025/04/03/15-noncitizen-v...

[2] https://www.csoonline.com/article/4046997/whistleblower-doge...