I get there’s a lot of false hype around various projects and the space has scams but looking beyond that, is it not a system that can disrupt existing financial system? Im taking about things like decentralised exchanges, RWAs, stablecoins, appear to be converging on allowing more people to participate in the financial markets without needing to go thru lengthy onboarding processes or engaging with brokers. The programmable factor also allows for there to be a platform for new ways of auntonomous transacting.
Do people tend to disagree with this vision or if not, why then would people here on HN have a negative view on crypto?
verdverm•1h ago
A lot of hammer looking for nails and the micro-financialization of everything. "Crypto" has been captured by Wallstreet and the oligarchs, Trump is using it for corruption. How much money did they print while crowing about what you find in the Bitcoin genesis block?
"allowing more people to participate in the financial markets" (*hit like this is a lie, it's really about being able to middleman and take a cut of every transaction, or leave them as the bag holders)
HN will find interest in various blockchain technologies extracted from the crypto. Things like using ZKP to have online safety while preserving privacy, that is an interesting intersection of HN fav topics.
Case in point, I find that Google is pushing on ZKP interesting and exciting: https://blog.google/innovation-and-ai/technology/safety-secu...
We're talking about similar in ATProto ecosystem