Let me clarify: the ability to detect, record, and process the signal from a person's brain or nervous system can be done in such a way that audio and images are decoded that closely match what the person is thinking. Furthermore, this can be done in a way that is not easily detectable (unlike a big fMRI machine). In particular, a signal detection and wireless transmission device can be implanted in someone, and the rest (receiving and decoding of the signal) is already commonly done.

Unfortunately, I believe I was the subject of such experimentation at some point in the past. Hence, pretty much everything I experience is known to whatever party is on the receiving side of the signal, assuming this party has the appropriate means to decode the signal.

I came to know this (with strong probability) due to a mix of circumstances that occurred. You can read more about my (true) story here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RWlHdim9SQ2FpAvSs8tO72oPcU84VBRPAl99zhqSpsE

Currently I'm stuck due to a brain fog that prevents me from just moving on and working on things of interest (e.g. math and computer stuff) as well as moving on in life (e.g. settling down with a partner, say). So why would someone engineer such a brain fog?

One possible reason I have considered is that such a brain fog might change the signal being sent from my brain or nervous system. Perhaps I saw something that "they" don't want me to have seen, and the fog obfuscates the signal. Medicines which I have been taking on and off for some time that also have fog-like side effects also may be motivated by the effects it may have on the signal. In either case, I just want to have clarity of mind again, just as I did for most of my life until covert operations seemed to occur in 2018 and 2019, after which fog and medicines became a thing.

I'm not sure where to go from here. However, I thought I would share this on hackernews since a combination of thought-provoking material and technology-savvy folks seem to frequent the forum, and may consider my (true) story from such a perspective, rather than dismissing it as fake or made up. And, perhaps interesting or useful suggestions might come up.

One thing I have considered is working on detection of the signal myself or working with an expert. This would provide substantial evidence. I'd imagine that a commonly available electromagnetic frequency meter would pick up whatever signal is being transmitted wirelessly, unless it's not EMF based. I'm not sure I would have the expertise to do this and recognize the signal, but in theory it sounds doable. I am also unsure of whether I would be able to acquire a meter that has not been tampered with and hacked so that I would get a reliable signal, and this problem would extend to working with other people in detection I suppose.