Goal: Reduce the “data tax” (storage/egress) and the “CPU tax” (decompress/parse) by keeping data searchable while compressed.
What’s different: - Page-based layout + Bloom filter skipping + a small directory index - Fast exists/pos/eq-style lookups without full decompression
Proof-first (no meeting required): - A 10-minute offline Demo Pack (wheel + sample .see + scripts + OnePager) - A DD Evidence Pack designed for reviewers (mismatch-zero checks, audit status, verification file list)
I’m exploring either: (A) acquisition (asset purchase), or (B) an exclusive license with a strategic buyer with a clear integration path. Evaluation slots are limited.
Repo + release assets are linked in the comments. Happy to answer technical questions here.
Tetsuro•1h ago
If you want to verify quickly: 1) Demo: run the offline Demo Pack (~10 minutes) 2) DD: confirm pack_verify PASS + mismatch=0 + audit PASS (see the release notes checklist)