Can't I just script a 'human-like' delay and spoof the log? Currently, yes. But v0.1 is about the container. Future iterations will look at signing and making it as computationally expensive to fake the process as it is to just write the text.

Is this just surveillance? It’s an Opt-in Declaration. The user owns the file and the log.

You mention Canvas and Moodle integration... do you envision students being required to use a TWFF-native editor embedded inside these platforms? If so, it seems to me like the actual hard part would be recreating gdocs but on a upload-your-homework SaaS budget.

And what about block quotes? If I have a couple sentences to quote from another work, will pasting them into the editor cause them to be marked as "AI generated?"

I think you're on the right track here, but it may be better to focus on logging how edits were made, whether by manual typing or pasting. Add an "undo" button that pops the latest edit off the stack. At that point, AI cheating can still be manually detected by searching the change log for long pastes, then inspecting any long pastes for their content.

But even that doesn't actually work, because I could just generate some sludge with ChatGPT, then hand-type the output into the editor. At least you've made it less convenient, I guess.

I really like this idea, best of luck.