I built a similarity search algorithm that beats FAISS HNSW on both speed
Tested on the same data, same machine (RTX 4060), same queries, verified against brute-force ground truth:
VOIS Similarity Search — Patent Pending 100K vectors, 128-dim, top-10 retrieval, RTX 4060
QPS Recall VOIS v3 (3 probes): 112,879 95.2% VOIS v3 (4 probes): 100,426 99.5% VOIS v3 (5 probes): 94,812 100.0% FAISS HNSW: 41,668 92.1% 2.7x faster than HNSW with better recall Multi-dimension scaling (seperate method, same hardware) 100K vectors, top-10, RTX 4060 DIM VOIS QPS VOIS Recall HNSW QPS HNSW Recall 128 145,163 100.0% 70,956 89.3% 256 79,349 99.99% 31,875 80.9% 512 29,750 100.0% 12,901 78.6% 768 40,274 97.9% 8,991 74.3% 500K vectors: DIM VOIS QPS VOIS Recall HNSW QPS HNSW Recall 128 32,696 100.0% 31,139 67.3% 256 14,384 100.0% 17,109 50.9% 512 5,864 100.0% 8,700 41.8% HNSW recall collapses at higher dimensions. VOIS is immune. 100% recall achieved at 2 probes for 512-dim and 768-dim.
PXQuantumLabs•2h ago
Tested on the same data, same machine (RTX 4060), same queries, verified against brute-force ground truth:
VOIS Similarity Search — Patent Pending 100K vectors, 128-dim, top-10 retrieval, RTX 4060