But it makes sense it is a GUI browser since it was developed on a NeXT
I'm having trouble pinning down when WorldWideWeb got inline image support, but based on https://www.w3.org/History/1991-WWW-NeXT/Implementation/Feat... I'm guessing sometime between 1992 and 1994, when there are screenshots with inline images, so maybe after Lynx was published.
https://www.themarginalian.org/2014/07/18/les-horribles-cern...
I was also disappointed that the editing went away after the first browser. (There was "Amaya" which had editing, but it was a research thing and not a commonly used browser.)
The original source code isn't really involved, which is a shame, since it is actually available.
IMHO this should have been (something along the lines of) GNUstep + TimBL's original code (mirror: https://github.com/cynthia/WorldWideWeb) + Emscripten + getting Emscripten to work with ObjC. Now, that would have been cool.
This is the most commented HN posting on this from that time (2019):
The performance would likely be comparable %)
:-)
tylerdane•1h ago
Kim_Bruning•34m ago
Something was lost along the way.
(Nowadays you need a separate wiki engine on a site to be able to do that)
krapp•29m ago
I don't think a web where every page is globally editable by default would be a good idea, but I can't imagine at all how it would work without a backend, unless all of the changes are just local. But that seems pointless.
actionfromafar•20m ago
zabzonk•19m ago
Making notes for your own consumption?
Kim_Bruning•19m ago