First of all, the British don't need a visa to come to America as tourists. Second of all, it says her husband overstayed his work visa as he didn't renew.
Reporters these days seem to ignore truth and just write based on their ideology. Personally I'd like to see a "ratemyreporters" website similar to a "ratemyprofessors" style so we can quickly look up how much on the side of truth each reporter is actually on. Semi-fictional writers masquerading as news reporters is an epidemic.
And these same publication have zero concerns for actual victims of illegals and are never reporting on the actual criminals arrested by ICE. Criminals typically wanted for rape and/or assault and sometimes murder too.
There's an ICE page where they published 40 000 names / pictures / and for each person the crimes committed: that's more than 5% of the 600 000 arrested and deported already on that website.
Here's what democrats keep ignoring and why Trump got elected:
"42 percent of immigrants arrested by ICE under CAP from local incarceration have a criminal conviction."
Criminals that dems would have happily released on US soil after their, typically light, sentences would have expired.
But we'll get instead the cherry-picked old lady whose husband overstayed his VISA but who's probably neither a rapist nor a murdered.
The same propagandist publications that will never write a word about Laken Riley or Iryna Zarutska (killed to the tune off "take that, white girl") shall happily post pictures of good people getting arrested by ICE.
Here are some nice people anti-ICE people want to see freely roaming US cities:
> never reporting on the actual criminals arrested by ICE
Because the numbers are so low.
Still, don't despair, the shortfall is over inflated by Fox News and their ilk who make a major production out of the the few actual criminals deported (although they rarely report on the citizens who are arrested)
Swings and arrows (as the saying doesn't go).
Less than 14% of those arrested by ICE in Trump's 1st year back in office had violent criminal records, document shows
denuoweb•1h ago
Reporters these days seem to ignore truth and just write based on their ideology. Personally I'd like to see a "ratemyreporters" website similar to a "ratemyprofessors" style so we can quickly look up how much on the side of truth each reporter is actually on. Semi-fictional writers masquerading as news reporters is an epidemic.
https://ground.news/ is a nice start.
TacticalCoder•29m ago
There's an ICE page where they published 40 000 names / pictures / and for each person the crimes committed: that's more than 5% of the 600 000 arrested and deported already on that website.
Here's what democrats keep ignoring and why Trump got elected:
"42 percent of immigrants arrested by ICE under CAP from local incarceration have a criminal conviction."
Criminals that dems would have happily released on US soil after their, typically light, sentences would have expired.
But we'll get instead the cherry-picked old lady whose husband overstayed his VISA but who's probably neither a rapist nor a murdered.
The same propagandist publications that will never write a word about Laken Riley or Iryna Zarutska (killed to the tune off "take that, white girl") shall happily post pictures of good people getting arrested by ICE.
Here are some nice people anti-ICE people want to see freely roaming US cities:
https://www.ice.gov/most-wanted
Very serious double standards at play.
defrost•24m ago
Because the numbers are so low.
Still, don't despair, the shortfall is over inflated by Fox News and their ilk who make a major production out of the the few actual criminals deported (although they rarely report on the citizens who are arrested)
Swings and arrows (as the saying doesn't go).
Less than 14% of those arrested by ICE in Trump's 1st year back in office had violent criminal records, document shows
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ice-arrests-violent-criminal-re...
kenloef•9m ago
"It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.”
Does this fit into your conception of justice? Why or why not?
defrost•15m ago
They require a visa OR a visa equivalent.
GOV.UK travel advice to UK nationals seeking US entry. https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/usa/entry-requireme...The woman having a visa is common and doesn't negate the tale told.