frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Show HN: A 100% free, universal ATS resume builder (no export paywalls)

https://makemycvfree.com/
1•mdmohseenraees•2m ago•0 comments

Compress Your Claude.md: Cut 60-70% of System Prompt Bloat in Claude Code

https://techloom.it/blog/compress-claude-md.html
1•jchilcher•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A free web utility to send WhatsApp messages without saving numbers

https://directwhatsapp.com/
1•mdmohseenraees•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LLM CLI (Claude, etc.) copy text has hard returns – macOS tool clean it

https://github.com/andrewarrow/clean-text
1•fcpguru•4m ago•1 comments

Desk Setup: From Multi-Monitor to Single Screen with Virtual Desktops

https://www.ssp.sh/brain/computer-desk-setup-monitor-workflow/
1•birdculture•4m ago•0 comments

Yes, You're Royally Screwed. Now Here's What to Do About It

https://www.ampup.ai/blog/saaspocolypse
1•amitprakash1•5m ago•0 comments

AI Is Bad

https://freelancing-gods.com/2026/02/13/ai-is-bad
1•xky•5m ago•0 comments

AI, Jobs, and the 40-Year-Old Paper We Forgot to Read

https://fayssalelmofatiche.substack.com/p/ai-jobs-and-the-40-year-old-paper
1•fayssalm•6m ago•0 comments

Theo on context management: "Delete your Claude.md (and your AGENT.md too)" [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GcNu6wrLTJc
1•zahlman•7m ago•0 comments

OpenHarness: A code-first, composable SDK to build powerful AI agents

https://github.com/MaxGfeller/open-harness
1•MaxGfeller•7m ago•1 comments

Qntm's Leap Second Simulator

https://qntm.org/files/simulator/index.html
1•pavel_lishin•7m ago•0 comments

Mercury 2: The fastest reasoning LLM, powered by diffusion

https://www.inceptionlabs.ai/blog/introducing-mercury-2
1•fittingopposite•7m ago•0 comments

Blinc: A declarative, reactive UI system with GPU-accelerated rendering

https://github.com/project-blinc/Blinc
1•PaulHoule•9m ago•0 comments

Terms of use: What types of competition do model providers ban?

1•SteveVeilStream•10m ago•0 comments

Claude Code Remote Control

https://twitter.com/claudeai/status/2026418433911603668
1•strzalek•11m ago•0 comments

Ghostly UV sparks light up forests as thunderstorms pass overhead

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/ghostly-uv-sparks-light-up-forests-as-thunderstorms-pa...
1•mathgenius•12m ago•0 comments

Maxwells Equation

1•MrBlink•12m ago•0 comments

A KID survived – Satellite post flight report

https://orbitalparadigmspace.notion.site/
2•gtzi•13m ago•0 comments

A quine that plays snake over its own source

https://github.com/taylorconor/quinesnake
1•nc0•13m ago•0 comments

Identity Watchlist System Tied to OpenAI Discovered in Logs

https://blog.boycat.io/posts/openai-persona-identity-watchlist-infrastructure-investigation-2026
1•abdelhousni•13m ago•1 comments

Rust Debugging Survey 2026

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2026/02/23/rust-debugging-survey-2026/
1•birdculture•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: OpenTangl – Autonomous AI dev engine for multi-repo products

https://github.com/8co/opentangl
1•8con•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MephistoVault – Zero-storage P2P file transfer via WebRTC

https://www.mephistoshares.online/
1•benmxrt•15m ago•0 comments

Cell Service for the Fairly Paranoid

https://www.cape.co/
3•0xWTF•16m ago•0 comments

deck2video: Generate LLM-narrated presentations from Markdown

https://github.com/pjdoland/deck2video
1•droctothorpe•16m ago•1 comments

OpenFeds – Tracking the federal workforce with OPM data (2018–2025)

https://www.openfeds.org
2•kianoconnor•21m ago•0 comments

UK Government confirms broadcast-style regulations for streaming services

https://news.sky.com/story/streaming-services-like-netflix-to-be-subject-to-same-regulation-as-br...
1•HtmlProgrammer•21m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Prompt your billing system – Flexprice MCP Server

https://flexprice.io/
2•manishfp•21m ago•0 comments

The Great Data Reckoning (2028)

https://joereis.substack.com/p/2028-the-great-data-reckoning
2•hn1986•24m ago•1 comments

AWS Extends Agentic AI Capabilities of Kiro to Improve Code Quality

https://devops.com/aws-extends-agentic-ai-capabilities-of-kiro-developer-tool-to-improve-code-qua...
1•t2f2•25m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Mac mini will be made at a new facility in Houston

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/02/apple-accelerates-us-manufacturing-with-mac-mini-production/
180•haunter•1h ago

Comments

epolanski•1h ago
They have been saying this since almost a decade.
buzzerbetrayed•1h ago
They’re literally opening a new 20,000 square foot facility I Houston. So I’m not sure what your comment implies, but it takes time to build things like that.
epolanski•1h ago
Sure, they pledged 100B under Biden and 200 under trump..to produce a bunch of Mac minis.
iamtheworstdev•1h ago
i guess he's wondering if they finally managed to secure a domestic screw producer or they're if importing them from China?
newsclues•50m ago
They have made some machines in the us, like the Mac pro
evanjrowley•1h ago
Why does the video show them assembling rackmount servers and not the Mac Mini?

Is that assembly really in the US? Asking because the woman in the first shot appeared to have Chinese letters on the left side of her uniform.

tekacs•1h ago
My guess would be that they're building Apple internal hardware as a precursor? So that Apple can be the test customer?
jjice•1h ago
> “We began shipping advanced AI servers from Houston ahead of schedule, and we’re excited to accelerate that work even further.”
buzzerbetrayed•1h ago
In the second paragraph it says they’re producing advanced AI servers.
giobox•1h ago
It's in the post: "In Houston, workers assemble advanced AI servers, including logic boards produced onsite, which are then used in Apple data centers in the U.S."
j45•1h ago
Mac Mini's have had a following for a long time.

Increasing for sure with different uses and possibilities.

latexr•1h ago
> Why does the video show them assembling rackmount servers and not the Mac Mini?

Because the video is of the workers in that specific factory, and they’ll only start producing the Mac mini there later in the year. It’s in the title. You can’t show real video of something which hasn’t happened yet.

mirekrusin•44m ago
They're assembling linux boxes that run their cloud.
kylehotchkiss•26m ago
> You can’t show real video of something which hasn’t happened yet.

We're going to have to teach our children this concept about discerning the AI slop their grandparents flood Facebook with :')

ChrisMarshallNY•13m ago
> You can’t show real video of something which hasn’t happened yet.

I have seen exactly that, thanks to AI...

rayiner•54m ago
I assume Foxconn, etc., have a lot of Chinese and Taiwanese workers on site to help bootup the facilities. But Apple's Houston facility is a real place: https://www.google.com/maps/place/8702+Fairbanks+North+Houst...

Foxconn bought it last year: https://communityimpact.com/houston/cy-fair-jersey-village/d...

wredcoll•32m ago
That's... amusing.
arcfour•51m ago
How would you take a video of something that has yet to happen?
amelius•46m ago
Ask AI.
mirekrusin•43m ago
They only have Siri.
irishcoffee•38m ago
Same difference?
mikestew•20m ago
Oh, if only that were true...and that's the joke.
whilenot-dev•49m ago
Interestingly, these exact letters appear to have been removed in the photo after the first two paragraphs: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/images/2026/02/apple-accelera...

EDIT: a screenshot from the video: https://imgur.com/a/X3t4crC

rayiner•38m ago
Crazy propaganda!
neilv•32m ago
Apple PR did what they could with the art they had available and the need to pander to a gov't administration, but weren't inspired to do it more genuinely?

"Think Different" -> "Think Indifferent"

cestith•14m ago
Well, they’re dealing with an administration indifferent to thinking. Everything is emotional.
tokyobreakfast•47m ago
Are you suggesting Apple is engaged in a massive subterfuge where they imported Black and Hispanic actors and hung a US and Texas flag on the wall in a Chinese factory as a staged photo op? Maybe the factory is really a sound stage.
SpaceManNabs•1h ago
I understand apple's push for US manufacturing in general but what do they mean by AI servers? I thought apple's current AI strategy is using other AI models?
jjice•1h ago
I believe they're choosing to run Google models on their hardware.
tibbydudeza•1h ago
They are using M workstation class chips for inference on their own blades since Google's models are meant run on TPU's it would not have been difficult to port it.

They also use Anthropic internally (code/marketing/sales) which runs their models on Cerebras so they also seem to be agnostic so runs on the same Apple hardware.

snazz•7m ago
Private Cloud Compute uses their own hardware: https://security.apple.com/blog/private-cloud-compute/
jjice•1h ago
Really looking forward to seeing how this ends up, especially over the next few years. I knew about their recent Arizona TSMC chips in iPhones, but this is nice to see.
arthurcolle•1h ago
Apple ramping up Mac mini production in Houston to meet demand for Clawbots is wild. When were Mac minis a hot commodity before three weeks ago?
bigyabai•1h ago
This is not for Clawdbot, this is a re-run of the 2019 strategy where Apple promises to manufacture a low volume of high-margin PC enclosures on US soil.
arthurcolle•1h ago
They mention Mac mini! They have like 3 other desktop lines going, and they mentioned the mini!

Also: "In Houston, workers assemble advanced AI servers, including logic boards produced onsite, which are then used in Apple data centers in the U.S."

Advanced AI servers!

Aurornis•1h ago
> They mention Mac mini! They have like 3 other desktop lines going, and they mentioned the mini!

Mac Mini is their simplest product. It's the natural place to start training at a new facility.

> Advanced AI servers!

Yes, they have their own AI servers.

jeffbee•1h ago
> Mac Mini is their simplest product.

How can it be simpler than the Apple TV?

LoganDark•1h ago
Do they now? I assume they use them internally for something like Private Cloud Compute?
sigmar•1h ago
>With its next-level AI capabilities, it has become an essential tool for everyone from students and aspiring creatives to small business owners.

Seems to me this part of the PR release is a reference to claudbot/openclaw. What else could it be referring to?

minimaxir•1h ago
Apple has been taking about Apple Silicon's AI capabilities for the past few years, particularly around Apple Intelligence.
gjsman-1000•1h ago
How about Apple Intelligence having been in almost every press release from the last year?

If you genuinely can't find out what they are referring to, you've been on HN too long.

Aurornis•1h ago
> to meet demand for Clawbots is wild

This is not in response to OpenClaw. It takes a long time to plan a new manufacturing facility.

The Mac Mini is a natural place to start training at a new facility because it's their simplest product.

Mac Minis are also around 1% of Apple's device sales. Even with an OpenClaw-inspired burst of sales, it's still a small part of their volume.

gigatexal•1h ago
This is to appease pumpkin potus and his merry band of idiots
gjsman-1000•1h ago
So what? Even if you hate who the president is, it is in the best interest of everyone that the president does a good job. Wanting the president to fail and millions to suffer is scorched earth hatred, not strategy.
rayiner•1h ago
Even if you hate the orange guy, there's something to be said for his approach of using threats to achieve results instead of carrots like tax breaks.
gigatexal•8m ago
Haha very telling that this is what you find laudable. Onshoring manufacturing … it’s a low margin low skill (relative) industry compared to the services and things of the modern economy. We import goods made cheaper in other countries and benefit from it in consumer surplus… that the educated here on HN can invert a tree or whatever the latest leet code garbage is being asked in interviews but never took and economics class or basic ethics is beyond me.
bastardoperator•52m ago
This President isn't doing a good job on really any level. Its not that I want anyone to fail, it's that the President today is currently in a state of failure, and those failures like enriching himself can have long term devastating effects on our society.
rayiner•19m ago
He’s done a great job on immigration. Migrant border crossings are at the lowest level in 50 years: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2026/02/02/migrant-e.... And we had the first year of net negative outmigration in decades.

Now, you might disagree on whether blocking immigration from unsuccessful countries is a good thing or not. Maybe you disagree that those immigrants will bring the problems of their home countries to the U.S. But many prior Presidents have promised to do this and until Trump they have all failed.

gigatexal•10m ago
Obama managed to deport many without the vitriol or the killing of American citizens. Are you a one issue voter? Just showing a blind eye to everything so long as no brown folks cross into this country?
gigatexal•12m ago
Business will continue to business. POTUS is a failed businessman many times over who only increased his wealth by whoring himself to our enemies be extorting our allies.

I’m on the right side of history. Are you?

kshacker•1h ago
The same thing could be said after polishing with AI and it will be a fact

As stated, it is offensive

You need to do appeasement as needed. Business is business.

gigatexal•13m ago
Your ability to rationalize would make you a king in a true failed state where might makes right and appeasement actually works. Stand for something or you’ll fall for anything like justifying the moron in chief.
jajuuka•1h ago
I think there was a rush during the early Intel transition because they were dirt cheap computers you can upgrade yourself and even dual boot Windows. I feel like there was another big bump for them as a set top boxes to run XBMC or something. Might be wrong though. M1 release also saw the Mini's be a cheap entry point to seeing what Apple Silicon could do.
mikepurvis•1h ago
Even to this day there aren't really a ton of options for a non-devkit, non-router arm64 machine that you can use as a desktop workstation.
Fergusonb•1h ago
They're definitely more popular right now, but they've been a winner since M1.

Great performance, quiet, efficient.

It would be tough to get a windows machine at that price that gets anywhere close on performance, especially if you consider the cost of electricity.

Great parent/grandparent machines, home servers.

bigyabai•56m ago
> It would be tough to get a windows machine at that price that gets anywhere close on performance

Not that tough. I paid $299 for a Ryzen 5800h mini PC last year, which roughly lands in the same performance bracket.

Would have considered the Mac Mini, but the AMD box has much better Linux support.

alwillis•22m ago
> a Ryzen 5800h mini PC last year, which roughly lands in the same performance bracket [as a Mac mini].

Not really. And this is before the M5 Mac mini which ships later this year.

Putting it together in desktop‑mini form factors:

- Raw CPU: M4 is much faster single‑core, generally faster multi‑core at lower power.

- GPU: M4’s iGPU is roughly 2×+ Vega 8 and more modern.

- Memory subsystem: M4 has far higher bandwidth and unified memory, ideal for integrated GPU and many modern workloads.

- Efficiency/noise: M4 wins by a large margin; much higher perf per watt.

- Compatibility: 5800H wins if you need bare‑metal x86 OSes like FreeBSD or specific x86‑only software stacks.

- 5800H: 35–54 W configurable TDP in laptops; mini‑PC implementations often run it fairly hot to maintain clocks.

- M4 in Mac mini: ~24 W base TDP, ~40 W boost, but getting clearly higher performance per watt.

caminante•8m ago
Let's assume the 5800H consumed 50W and the mini consumed 0W and both ran 100% utilization all year at $0.20/kWh.

The mini would save $87/year. That's a 3.5y breakeven assuming no reinvestment.

caminante•17m ago
Even if the mini is more power efficient at $600 base, saving $300 upfront pushes out the breakeven point.
paul7986•1h ago
Love my Mac Minis..great computers to connect to a TV for a full Internet experience on your TV.
thinkingtoilet•1h ago
Others need to follow. It's strange that we don't view the manufacturing of advanced electronics as a matter of national security.
mattnewton•50m ago
The government is slowly waking up to how important chips are and how far behind domestic sources have fallen from foreign (mostly Chinese and Taiwanese) sources. That's what the 2022 CHIPS act was about.

These things just take a lot of time, there are tremendous headwinds to fight, and the US government + US media increasingly seems unable to see through projects past the next election cycle.

ChrisMarshallNY•8m ago
What folks don't talk about, is that the reason for all the offshoring, is good old-fashioned American Greed™.

Lots of billionaires in the US, got that way, by exporting all their production to China. Because they did it, lots of lower-tier people had to do the same, or go out of business.

Since we worship billionaires, that little bit never seems to get mentioned, as it makes them look bad.

The only cure is to cost some of those billionaires money.

Ain't gonna happen.

hypeatei•1h ago
[flagged]
s-y•1h ago
Your point being?
hypeatei•1h ago
It's all ass-kissing and not meaningful. Trump's famous line is always "in two weeks we'll do it" so tech leaders have caught on. Just promise a bunch and say "soon"
s-y•1h ago
You are full of hatred. Try to see the world without the political glasses. Sun glasses at night are douchy.
gridder•35m ago
Please enlighten us about your hatred and political (sun) glasses free vision
philipallstar•1h ago
Those sound like good things. I'm not sure why your second paragraph sounds like the opposite.
bigyabai•1h ago
They're cursory gestures at best, and stark condemnations of US manufacturing capacity at worst. The Mac Mini and Mac Pro are not complex or dense electronics in the slightest. They're carrier enclosures for TSMC technology, you could probably make them in Siberia if you wanted to.

The hard part is manufacturing Apple's high-volume hardware, namely the iPhone. That is not anywhere close to being onshored, and Apple seemingly has no interest in even attempting it if Indian labor is still an option.

As Tim Cook put it: "In the US, you could have a meeting of tooling engineers, and I’m not sure we could fill the room. In China, you could fill multiple football fields..."

buzzerbetrayed•1h ago
Let’s say you’re right and Apple is only doing this because of Trump.

Then Trump did a good thing. You’re inadvertently praising Trump in your attempt to slander Tim Cook.

techpression•1h ago
Didn’t know they were also pushing education so heavily, I mean it makes sense, but still great to see that they don’t expect skills and knowledge to appear out of thin air and is putting money to improving it.
AIorNot•1h ago
Better than nothing- assemble things made in asian countries in usa, just a step above boxing
lysace•58m ago
Why is that better?
rayiner•30m ago
Because it’s important to have the domestic capacity to build the most sophisticated products. Political power is downstream of manufacturing capacity. The countries that have sophisticated enough centrifuges that they can refine weapons grade plutonium derive an incredible amount of political power from that fact.

Remember that, after World War I, the U.S. had most demobilized its military. The Japanese had more aircraft carriers than the U.S. in 1941. That’s why Japan attacked Pearl Harbor—it thought it could win!

But while the U.S. was weak militarily, it had been the largest industrial producer since the late 19th century. Within a couple of years of Pearl Harbor, the U.S. had built a bigger air force and navy than the rest of the world combined.

That’s why it’s better to be able to make Mac Minis in Houston. Because you can repurpose those facilities to produce electronics for warships instead of having to buy parts from countries you might be at war with.

d--b•1h ago
My wild guess is that Cook cut a deal with the IRS so that they build in the US, but get tax benefits other companies don't get, so that it looks good on the administration - like the tariffs are working - and still benefits Apple.

I don't think Apple wouldn't find a cheaper place to manufacture Macs than the US. The US is literally the most expensive place to build.

That, or the Mac Minis are 100% asembled by robots, which is also a possibility.

nessbot•1h ago
Can one "cut a deal" with the IRS without it ending up in legislation (i.e. tax law)?
CursedSilicon•54m ago
Not without a big beautiful bribe [1] I assume

[1] https://www.theverge.com/news/737757/apple-president-donald-...

nessbot•48m ago
Yeah, not denying the bribing. But that doesn't change tax law. It still needsto be passed by congress. Does it affect enforcement, though? maybe
CursedSilicon•14m ago
So much of what this admin has done "needed" to be approved by congress. They're complicit in the overreach of power
mattnewton•47m ago
Legally no, but in practice the president has been trying to assert the power to unilaterally levy taxes, even in spite of the supreme court ruling that you need the legislature to pass a tax. People still paid the tariffs. I would be extremely suprised if that's the only place this admin is trying to tax by fiat, and tax policy enforcemetn is far less visible than consumer tariffs.
null_deref•1h ago
Non political genuine question, is building in the USA more expensive than let’s say Germany?
runako•40m ago
No. But you have to understand that American political rhetoric only allows for things to be made either in the US or China (and occasionally Mexico). In that framework, yes the US is the most expensive place to make things.
bdangubic•1h ago
by IRS you mean Mar a Largo?
giobox•55m ago
We already know exactly what the deal is, no need to speculate. Apple got large tariff exemptions in exchange for supporting Trump's "Made in America" agenda:

> https://www.wsj.com/tech/apple-invest-american-manufacturing...

> https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/08/06/apple-exempt-from...

random3•1h ago
Gotta love PR embracing the many definitions of "made in"
givemeethekeys•8m ago
Surely, someone high up asked, "What is the least amount of work we have to do in order to not pay tariffs?"
jesse_dot_id•1h ago
i_dont_believe_you.gif
general_reveal•50m ago
Was it such a sin that our electronics were made in the East? Was the west truly deprived and the east really abused? It’s nearly the end of of our lifetime (+-100 years is a margin of error), so the fact for our lifetimes is that our electronics got made there.

What is the final judgement about this?

TulliusCicero•46m ago
"Sin" is the wrong framing, but outsourcing most of your capability to actually make stuff can definitely cause problems for a country.

For example, on a military level, the US is concerned about how rapidly China is catching up in naval capacity, China is building new warships far faster than the US can. And it's hard not to notice that China's overall shipbuilding capacity is more than 200x higher than America's.

The US has a lot of pride over having been "the arsenal of democracy" in WW2, and it's well known that a huge part of why the US was effective in that war was sheer mass: the US simply made much more war 'stuff' than any other combatant. But if the US was to get in a shooting war with China today, it would likely be China that would enjoy an advantage in production scale, with the US trying to make do with fewer vehicles and munitions.

general_reveal•40m ago
Tactical error then. I suppose I was hoping someone would make the human plea that the barter was mostly a net good for our lifetimes. Our neighbors made our clothes. You suggest tactically this a problem, but I’m wondering if we managed to live peacefully and goodly this way?
notepad0x90•25m ago
The same reason Europeans are moving away from US tech right now. You can't bury your head in the sand and pretend geopolitics is imaginary.
tedd4u•49m ago
It doesn't say the Mini will be exclusively produced at this US facility. I wonder in say 2 years what % will be "produced" in the US? 1%? 0.1%?
mcmcmc•41m ago
They’ll make a gold one there every year as tribute to Trump
alwillis•37m ago
> It doesn't say the Mini will be exclusively produced at this US facility.

What's likely to happen is Mac minis for North America will be made in Houston. Otherwise, the ones for the rest of the world will be made at the same facilities they are now.

Just like iPhones for the US are made in India; iPhones for the rest of the world are made in China.

kombine•48m ago
Wasn't going to buy one before, not going to buy one now.
pama•47m ago
Mac minis are sold out in NYC these days because everyone gets them to try out openclaw. Even if this move by Apple is unrelated to the recent demand, it certainly was timed right for the policy and market makers.
locusofself•46m ago
why were mac minis so popular for this compared to any other machine, cloud VPS or local VM?
llmslave•46m ago
so you can use the full operating system
Phemist•45m ago
More importantly iMessage
FitchApps•38m ago
And get hacked via prompt injection
amelius•43m ago
Because these people have Apple IDs, and they need a machine that can access their various accounts.
retired•33m ago
The Mac mini has a very good value for money if you need raw performance in a small silent package. Frequently available for between $399 - $499 discounted.

A VPS that can perform like a Mac mini will likely cost the same as a Mac mini in 12 months time.

hackingonempty•31m ago
Macs have "unified memory" meaning the GPU uses the same memory as the CPU and minis can have up to 64 gigs. So its a lot faster than running on a CPU and a lot cheaper than any other GPU based rig with similar memory.
mholm•25m ago
Most openclaw users are not running the models locally.
matthewfcarlson•7m ago
It allows your Claw to access all your iCloud data easily like reminders and iMessage for example
sigmar•6m ago
It's so funny to me that HN seems convinced that artists have a sudden renewed interest in desktop computers, when LLMs have been driving mac mini sales for more than a year
adamgordonbell•38m ago
Apple is very tied to Chinese manufacturing in a way that is hard to replicate in US.

They will agree to make some high margin simple to assemble thing in the US to appease government, but if it goes as well as last time, they will stop as soon as they can.

In china they were often able to iterate on designs and have custom screws and other parts made and ramped up in very short times. Something about having the whole supply chain in one place and very motivated and it all fell apart when tried to move to US.

So things that took weeks became hard on anytime line.. per Apple in China book.

NetMageSCW•35m ago
The press release says they’ve been making their own servers there successfully so it doesn’t seem like there is a reason they would stop Mini manufacturing quickly.
modeless•31m ago
They did the exact same thing with Mac Pro in 2019. I notice they don't say they'll stop manufacturing the Mac Mini anywhere else. This is a political thing and will change with the political winds.
nutjob2•27m ago
Two different things. They do not have margin to preserve on the servers.

If I was interested in "performative local manufacturing" I'd also build my own servers, it has the least economic impact.

vsgherzi•31m ago
Just as manufacturing in China took time manufacturing in the US will take time. The US has lost much of its skilled labor and mom and pop parts shop. If we have any hope of re-invigorating this some large company is going to have to bite the bullet. Chicken and egg problem imo. I'll leave whether this is worth it or not up to the economists.
tencentshill•27m ago
It needs a careful long term approach from real leaders. Not a run-and-gun, corrupt, chaotic president throwing tariffs (taxes) up on a whim.
ljsprague•23m ago
Real leaders like ... Kamala Harris?
OsrsNeedsf2P•21m ago
Was Kamala campaigning on bringing manufacturing to Texas?
tokyobreakfast•17m ago
The orange guy managed to do it where others failed or didn't even attempt to.
daymanstep•15m ago
Managed to do what?
tokyobreakfast•10m ago
Build products in the US. Those jobs Steve Jobs told Obama are "never coming back".
xienze•13m ago
He’s at least getting companies to pretend like they’re going to try. That’s a starting point. Before, the best you’d get out of these CEOs is “LOL those jobs are never coming back, learn to code or whatever else hasn’t been outsourced fully yet.”
9dev•15m ago
Are you sure that’s actually what you want though, competing with China in skilled labor?
vsgherzi•10m ago
Of course I do. Competition can only be good here.
apercu•27m ago
Jebus. “It’s hard to manufacture in the US.”

Yes.

That’s what rebuilding capability looks like.

China built dense supply chains over decades. Of course iteration was faster.

Hard isn’t a reason not to do it.

It’s what happens when you’ve optimized for margin and optics and performance instead of resilience.

nutjob2•22m ago
No, it's local manufacturing theater.

The US does a lot of manufacturing, second only to China, but not low margin stuff that isn't economic.

Trying to "bring back" that sort of thing is idiotic and is entirely performative and induced by the current incompetent administration.

China is a genuine threat but the right solution is to move it to other friendlier countries instead of losing money trying to do it in the US.

Stupid is a reason not to do it.

deaddodo•15m ago
This is the part that blows my mind. People seem to think the US is incapable of and does no manufacturing. It is the second largest manufacturer[1], and has a capacity about 65% of what China does. Which is 350% of the next largest manufacturing country.

What they stopped manufacturing was menial and low-end product; because it's not price-effective to have 100 Americans sit on an assembly line and solder SMT components for $7-18/hr. Instead, those potential workers pivoted into service jobs and office work.

1 - https://www.safeguardglobal.com/resources/blog/top-10-manufa...

delfinom•10m ago
Yes/no.

China at this point is hard in automation, beyond anything the US has. China is well past the peak of sweatshops.

As someone in the manufacturing space in the US, the biggest issue we have in the US is that manufacturing continues to die. Any manufacturing we have left is the old guard dying off. It comes from a range of issues from companies refusing to invest in younger employees, to the cost of real estate (both buy or rent) for commercial properties being absurd..

CPLX•8m ago
That’s just not the reason though.

The reason we can’t do manufacturing is because Wall Street demands capital light business models.

That, in turn, is an outcome of being the global reserve currency.

apercu•8m ago
Fair, but there is tons of HIGH END manufacturing we could do that we just don't, even though there is every incentive to do so.
WillPostForFood•10m ago
The US manufacturing situation is much worse than you suggest, and is top heavy with low margin boring industrial stuff. Largest sector for US manufacturing is Chemicals, which includes fertilizer, petrochemicals, pesticides, and some pharma. The second largest sector is Tobacco, Food, and Beverages.

I think some more "low margin" computer and chip manufacturing would be healthy.

AngryData•9m ago
It is apparently economic to do so in China and apparently any other place you want to outsource it to. Does smaller and one-off productions have as high of margins as high speed automated stamping machines running 24/7? No. But that doesn't mean it isn't profitable at all.

And quite frankly, who gives a fuck if top owners and investors get maximum returns, boo hoo they got 4% return instead of 8%, that is still far better than the average working class's deal. Our entire problem is a suffering middle and lower classes that need decent work, they will still be happy even if the product they make is a bit lower margin because they are paid hourly, not paid by dividends and stock options which is where all the higher margins profits go. Average citizens pay has not correlated with increased company profits, and increased company profits isn't what makes society stable, so the investor class is going to have to suck it up and take the hit unless they want their entire house of cards to collapse.

CPLX•6m ago
Yes you’ve hit on the reason. Very few people understand this.

The reason we don’t invest in manufacturing is because of requirements for return on capital.

Ask yourself why GM is doing massive stock buybacks in the era of global transition to electric cars. Why aren’t they using these huge sums of cash to invest in the next generation of products and instead literally just sending the money out the door?

tokyobreakfast•18m ago
> In china they were often able to iterate on designs and have custom screws and other parts made

Unless of course you need aerospace or space-qualified screws in which case they are definitely coming from the US.

Where China was successful is volume; Apple makes hundreds of millions of iPhones a year (I was shocked at that number) which is orders of magnitude more than computers. Kind of hard to deliver those numbers when you can't keep slaves on call in a dormitory.

embedding-shape•15m ago
> Unless of course you need aerospace or space-qualified screws

Ok... Is that what they're using to build Mac Minis and is that what they need to iterate on typically?

tokyobreakfast•6m ago
China is not the only source of the world's screws. Unless you mean cheap aluminum screws where the threads immediately deform.
ladberg•7m ago
> Unless of course you need aerospace or space-qualified screws in which case they are definitely coming from the US.

Are you claiming somehow that China would be incapable of making these? Or just admitting that the USG generally restricts such contracts to be sourced from the US only? And what does this have to do with Apple?

onlyrealcuzzo•12m ago
You could prototype assembly in China, then have everything ready to go, and do mass assembly elsewhere.
xuki•11m ago
Mac mini is a relatively low volume product for Apple, the margin hit would not be consequential to their bottom line. I'll believe it when they start making iPhone in the US.
ijustlovemath•35m ago
Helene survivor here. What's wild to me is that, regardless of the small scale of this facility, it's only a few hundred meters from a 1% flood zone: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search

The address I found for the facility is 9101 Windmill Park Lane Hudson, TX 77064

This seems ill advised given recent events like Hurricane Harvey

apercu•27m ago
Weirdly the first thing I thought was "Why Texas"?
mgh95•22m ago
Likely a combination of business-friendly policies (low tax, no employer payroll tax, etc.) and proximity to ports. Houston is the 6th [1] largest port in the USA.

[1] https://pangea-network.com/busiest-and-biggest-ports-in-the-...

apercu•11m ago
I agree with you on all of these except: low tax

I grew up in DFW.

My house in WI is assessed at a significantly higher value than my siblings house in Ft Worth.

My 2025 property tax bill ~$5k, my 2025 state income tax - not gonna publish it here but not all that significant.

Sibling in Texas property tax bill: ~$14k. Significantly higher than my state income tax + property tax.

Also, I don't have to live in Texas.

ViscountPenguin•6m ago
Given that this is being done in large part to appease Trump the fact that it's a red state surely has something to do with it too.
lysace•25m ago
That's a good sign it's not a serious long-term effort. Onshoring cosplay?
Dig1t•21m ago
They will build to a much higher standard than normal US residential construction, as they do with most commercial buildings. Many people do not understand the vast difference between residential construction quality and the quality that mega corps get. I personally watched Apple build their new campus in Austin (I have daily progress pictures of the construction site, I work there), everything is solid concrete. These buildings can withstand any type of hurricane.

Flooding is also something which can be mitigated: build foundations to be taller, work with the topography to avoid the path of water, and build drainage solutions. You should see the drainage field that Apple built for their campus in Austin, it's absolutely massive and can divert an incredible amount of water.

boznz•19m ago
When it floods, they can hold their hands up and say "well we tried".. then get back to business as usual in China
vsgherzi•34m ago
Is no one else interested in the "assemble advanced AI servers, including logic boards produced onsite, which are then used in Apple data centers in the U.S." in the pictures? Are they using nvidia GPUS? Their own silicon? Is there any data out there on what these servers are like? I don't think we've ever seen a picture of them before.
luketaylor•23m ago
WSJ published a video yesterday with the first pictures of those servers: https://twitter.com/yiningkarlli/status/2026176857541075274
vsgherzi•8m ago
man what I would give for one of those servers
doug_durham•12m ago
I believe it is the nodes for their private compute cloud for inference. They have described these in the past. It's all Apple chips.
wdb•31m ago
Next, are European made Apple devices?
flumpcakes•30m ago
The woman in the pink smock-like clothing:

In the video there are Chinese characters on the clothing above the front pocket area. In a picture of her later on in the news article the Chinese writing is gone.

Has it been photoshopped out for the press release images?

bangonkeyboard•9m ago
Good catch.
SilverElfin•29m ago
https://appleinsider.com/articles/26/02/24/apples-us-mac-min...

> Apple's work on a new Mac mini factory in Houston wasn't a quickly-conceived plan to appease President Donald Trump. The reality is that Apple had a plan ready to do this long before the demands started.

yndoendo•23m ago
While shopping I look where items are produced and by whom company. When I see an item is manufactured in Texas I put it back on the shelf and keep walking. That State is too politically corrupt for me to financially support, same with Florida.
tombert•20m ago
Don't most big tech companies have an office in Dallas or Austin? I remember that the MS campus was huge when I lived in Dallas.

If "can't have been made in any capacity in Texas" is your criteria that might be pretty difficult.

whalesalad•15m ago
Has anyone seen this documentary? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Factory
jimt1234•8m ago
What's the over-under for Trump mentioning this in the State Of The Union speech tonight? The timing of this release can't be a coincidence.
seydor•6m ago
Good but they should be named 'Mac Donald' or Trump Mini or something and it should be engraved with gold letters. And they are too small, they should be huge