How does yours compare to regexp on performance across many inputs?
Regexp is incredibly fast, I doubt yours comes anywhere close
and then there's the kicker, Ai are really good at crafting regexp, better than writing code to replace it, that's for sure
---
looks like the comment I am replying to has changed the link, it was this one: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/performance
Note to OP, use standard regexp benchmarks
[1] https://github.com/intel/hyperscan/tree/master
That could be a fun comparison. As someone mentioned, regular expressions are extremely fast, and have been benchmarked forever.
sgt•1h ago
hollowsolve•1h ago
verdverm•1h ago
How does yours compare to regexp on performance across many inputs?
Regexp is incredibly fast, I doubt yours comes anywhere close
and then there's the kicker, Ai are really good at crafting regexp, better than writing code to replace it, that's for sure
---
looks like the comment I am replying to has changed the link, it was this one: https://matchlang.com/docs/api/performance
Note to OP, use standard regexp benchmarks
hollowsolve•1h ago
sgt•40m ago
[1] https://github.com/intel/hyperscan/tree/master
That could be a fun comparison. As someone mentioned, regular expressions are extremely fast, and have been benchmarked forever.