frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Bandit a 32bit baremetal computer that runs color forth [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HK0uAKkt0AE
1•RomanZolotarev•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Agentplace, the tool we built to become a 20x company

https://agentplace.io/
1•Fortunevlad•4m ago•0 comments

Emacs Internal #01: Is a Lisp Runtime in C, Not an Editor

https://thecloudlet.github.io/blog/project/emacs-01/
1•smitty1e•4m ago•0 comments

Microsoft's Copilot Tasks AI uses its own computer to get things done

https://www.theverge.com/tech/885741/microsoft-copilot-tasks-ai
1•mikece•5m ago•0 comments

Colorado Lawmakers Push for Age Verification at the Operating System Level

https://www.pcmag.com/news/colorado-lawmakers-push-for-age-verification-at-the-operating-system-l...
1•mikece•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Ambit Shell – Easy Remote Shell for OpenClaw, Claude Code, etc.

https://github.com/ToxicPine/ambit-templates/tree/master/wetty
1•cardellifan•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Ambit-OpenCode – Cloud IDE with Seamless Mobile <> Desktop Handoff

https://github.com/ToxicPine/ambit-templates/blob/master/opencode/README.md
1•cardellifan•14m ago•0 comments

The Big Canada-Sweden Curling Beef

https://defector.com/the-big-canada-sweden-curling-beef-explained
1•ravenical•18m ago•0 comments

Politicians Consider Soviet-Style Controls on 3D Printers

https://reason.com/2026/02/25/politicians-consider-soviet-style-controls-on-3d-printers/
1•Stratoscope•18m ago•0 comments

Key OpenClaw Risks for Enterprise (Kaspersky)

https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/moltbot-enterprise-risk-management/55317/
1•ildar•21m ago•0 comments

Researchers Find 40k Exposed OpenClaw Instances

https://www.infosecurity-magazine.com/news/researchers-40000-exposed-openclaw/
3•ildar•22m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Pebbles – recurring reminders for stuff you forget

1•frontendstrong•25m ago•0 comments

Developer Roadmaps

https://techstack.sh/roadmap/
1•harrypotterwish•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Slim – local domains and HTTPS for dev servers

https://slim.sh/
1•kamranahmedse•26m ago•0 comments

The Physics of Squeaking Sneakers

https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/02/the-physics-of-squeaking-sneakers/
1•overtone1000•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Agent Bazaar – Billing and metering for MCP tool servers

https://noui.bot/docs/bazaar
1•hudtaylor•27m ago•0 comments

ODT to HTML Converter with Semantic CSS Styling

https://github.com/R2Innovation/odt2html
1•mou7664•27m ago•1 comments

Show HN: RotaFlow – A privacy-first shift calendar built with SwiftUI

https://www.rotaflow.app/
1•liliums•27m ago•0 comments

Spotify Update on Developer Access

https://developer.spotify.com/blog/2026-02-06-update-on-developer-access-and-platform-security
2•superasn•34m ago•0 comments

The Longest Line of Sight

https://tombh.co.uk/longest-line-of-sight
2•zdw•35m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I Built Smart Radio That Auto-Skips Talk and Ads by Using ML

https://tunejourney.com/
2•FreeGuessr•36m ago•1 comments

Ask HN: What happens when all 21M BTC is minted

3•totaldude87•36m ago•1 comments

Medicaidspending.org – Search $1.09T in Medicaid provider payments (2018-2024)

https://medicaidspending.org/
2•pw•36m ago•2 comments

AIlways – Meeting Truth and Context Copilot

1•kbp527•40m ago•0 comments

Would you use LLM:// connection URLs?

https://danlevy.net/llm-connection-strings/
1•justsml•41m ago•1 comments

Sharesight MCP

https://github.com/Haizzz/sharesight-mcp
1•haizzz•42m ago•0 comments

HeadElf – C-Suite Executive Intelligence System

https://pauljbernard.github.io/headElf/
1•paulbernard•42m ago•0 comments

I built a cross-platform music app with AI for under £400

https://massimo.mongardini.it/i-built-a-cross-platform-music-sharing-app-with-ai-for-under-300/
1•macsmax•44m ago•1 comments

C64 Copy Protection

https://www.commodoregames.net/copyprotection/
1•snvzz•46m ago•0 comments

Kyoto University develops AI monk robot equipped with Buddhist scriptures

https://japantoday.com/category/tech/kyoto-university-develops-ai-monk-robot-equipped-with-buddhi...
1•hhs•47m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Netflix Backs Out of Warner Bros. Bidding, Paramount Set to Win

https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/netflix-backs-out-warners-deal-paramount-win-1236516763/
64•atombender•1h ago

Comments

softwaredoug•1h ago
Maybe running up the price was part of the point.
galleywest200•48m ago
Paramount has a lot of problems right now, financially. Maybe Netflix plans to buy them both in the next few years after those issues come home to roost for Paramount.
softwaredoug•47m ago
Based on past owners of Warner Brothers, seems fairly likely in a few years. The value will be 1/10 of what it is today.
nutjob2•9m ago
And when there is a different US administration.
afavour•1h ago
I wasn’t bowled over by the idea of Netflix ownership but a merge of Paramount and Warner seems way, way worse. In a sane political situation this would raise huge antitrust concerns but… well, here we are I guess.

If it does go through I wonder if there’s a scenario where it still works out for Netflix: they could pick up assets at bargain prices when the merged studios inevitably sell and lay off everything they can.

softwaredoug•1h ago
State AGs play a role in anti trust enforcement. So it’s not over yet.
lapetitejort•57m ago
When has a state AG successfully cancelled a merger? Did any state try to prevent Microsoft and Activision's merger?
Bender•53m ago
Kroger/Albertsons Merger (2024-2025), JetBlue/Spirit Merger (2024), Visa/Plaid Merger (2021), "Capture-and-Kill" Ski Resort Acquisition (2021-2022), Hospital Mergers (Various 2024) are a few.
softwaredoug•5m ago
IIRC these also involved the Feds.

When Feds are not involved, its harder for State AGs to win. Not impossible. And they can slow things down / get concessions.

master_crab•1h ago
Well, Netflix did succeed at making the Ellisons pay a large fortune for something that costs a small fortune.
dylan604•48m ago
waits 20 minutes, cool, interest just covered whatever that extra was
throwaway5752•30m ago
Now they can control millennial and younger minds by controlling what CNN broadcasts.
afavour•26m ago
…young people don’t watch CNN.
btian•22m ago
Nobody watches CNN
llm_nerd•14m ago
I feel like you're posting some humorous sarcasm and are being misunderstood.
avtar•11m ago
Young people are more into TikTok than CNN, and the Ellisons already control that in the U.S.
PearlRiver•29m ago
Netflix so far has been the only consistent winning team in the streaming competition.

It is pretty clear that Trump wanted Paramount to win so it is smart for them to cut their losses.

israrkhan•53m ago
Paramount agreed to pay the $2.8 billion breakup fee that WBD would owe Netflix if that deal didn’t go through.
softwaredoug•50m ago
The behavior of each party in this whole process gives you a lot more confidence in Netflix leadership than Paramount / Skydance.

Paramount was about to go to idiotic lengths to get this. Netflix is willing to walk away.

dylan604•46m ago
Sure, I'd be willing to walk away with a briefcase holding $2.8 Billion with a B. How much stock would that buy back? Doubtful shareholders see any dividends from it.
master_crab•39m ago
Share price of Netflix jumped 10% after the news broke. Pretty sure shareholders will see a lot of upside.
lovich•43m ago
Yea Paramounts behavior doesn’t seem rational if the direct economics of the companies involved were the only concern.

But given that Paramount wanted to buy the CNN portion of the business that Netflix wasn’t even bidding on, it kinda seems like they have a longer term goal in place.

darth_avocado•47m ago
Netflix is going to buy them both for the same price in about 5 years. Paramount is a highly leveraged company. They are not going to come out of this very expensive acquisition unscathed.
mudil•24m ago
I would not bet against RedBird and Ellisons.
andsoitis•23m ago
One must.
HDThoreaun•19m ago
The Ellisons have zero liquidity issues. Theyll sell off parts to cut costs but no chance they sell the stuff they actually want
cyanydeez•7m ago
As long as they get to keep a media alt-right afloat in politics, it doesn't matter their value.
hnburnsy•40m ago
Like many things, phone OS, desktop OS, CPUs, GPUs, ride sharing, credit card payments, video game consoles, we are heading towards a Disney/Paramount duopoly
andsoitis•33m ago
> we are heading towards a Disney/Paramount duopoly

Duopoly over what? Worldwide video entertainment?

ibero•20m ago
paramount will disintegrate in due time.
helaoban•30m ago
Easiest $2.8 billion made in history?
zedlasso•28m ago
RIP Superman
aaronbrethorst•17m ago
"Truth, Justice, and the American Way" aren't dead yet.
nutjob2•10m ago
Are you sure?
mullingitover•27m ago
This means Netflix still has all that cash they were planning to spend on WB, plus the 2.5B breakup fee from WB.

They could arguably just build a better WB from scratch with that kind of money.

internet101010•19m ago
Or just buy Paramount in a couple of years.
crazygringo•18m ago
$2.8B! Which isn't huge next to Netflix's market value of $357B... but when you compare it with its $45B 2025 yearly revenue, it's at least a noticeable bump. You could make almost 4 five-season-long Stranger Things with it.
add-sub-mul-div•15m ago
They've spent many multiples of that on their throwaway binge content but that doesn't get them to something as culturally valuable as WB.
nutjob2•14m ago
It's WB's back catalog that is the main prize.
indigodaddy•26m ago
So NF is just not matching or exceeding an elevated Paramount offer... But could WBD still choose the already on the table NF deal at the end of the day? I guess with the sort of statement that Netflix made though, it's likely WBD would not and realizes NF is just done at this point. Or maybe it's some sort of double bluff by NF? Hard to really know for sure.
andsoitis•21m ago
It would not be in WBD shareholders interest to walk away from Paramount's overpayment. It is a great deal for WBD shareholders, but a poor financial outcome for Paramount. Netflix's discipline is noteworthy.
anduril22•24m ago
Unfortunately Paramount will retain HBO, and auction off Discovery, which no one wants anyway.
andsoitis•24m ago
Paramount's financing package combines roughly $45–46 billion in equity with more than $57 billion in debt.

The deal values Warner Bros. Discovery at around $111 billion ($31 per share), and including WBD's existing debt, the total takeover comes to more than $110 billion. NBC News

It would be the largest leveraged buyout (LBO) in history, with $87 billion of total pro forma gross debt and an estimated gross leverage of approximately 7x 2026 EBITDA before synergies.

Seems like a poor decision driven by ego.

xenadu02•16m ago
My question is: who is lending the money for these leveraged buyout deals? They seem to leave the lenders holding the bag at some point when it all implodes. Do these deals really pay off often enough to be worth financing them?
VonGuard•3m ago
Interesting perspective, here, from someone who has observed a tiny bit of unknown streaming history.

So, way back in the day, 2005, Turner Broadcast corp. launched this weird-ass thing, known as GameTap https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameTap . It was a subscription-based service that offered on-demand retro videogames. While it started as a way to play MAME Pac-Man and Metal Slug legally from a legit service, it grew into a competitor in the online games market arena in a time when Steam was still nascent.

The whole thing was created by this amazing fellow named Blake Lewin. Blake was really sharp, and having built this on-demand, streaming emulation service, he even went on to add at-the-time-modern games. Now, this stuff literally just installed the game on your HD and let you play, so it wasn't quite Stadia or Luma, but it was absolutely ahead of its time, and it was really slick.

I was a journalist then, and while games journalists get pampered, Turner moving into games was on another level. They launched this thing at the Armani Store on Market St. in SF, and when you walked in, they asked you to pick some sun-glasses from the case to take with you when you left.

GameTap was great and even gathered a following, but from the moment it launched, I knew what it really was: Turner's scientific experiment to build the infrastructure to later allow it to stream its enormous library of content. Movies, cartooons, TV shows, etc.

I was having lunch with Blake, a few years into GameTap, and I asked him point blank how the video streaming prototypes were coming (pure guess, no evidence). He was baffled and wanted to know how I knew they were working on that.

But in the end, the service never launched, AFAIK. Maybe some remnant is still there somewhere, but it just shows, you can be years ahead in your planning and development, and still end up alone at the end dance. It's a shame. Turner has so many great things in their library, why is it not possible for me to just pay someone for access to all the old movies in the TCM vault!?

underlipton•2m ago
Well, hope you enjoyed Pax Americana. We're heading into something that feels... about halfway between reich-y and soviet-y, at least on the propaganda front. Which is deeply ironic, of course.