Demanding regulatory intervention to cure 'enshittification' is simply replacing algorithmic validation with legal validation. Both are post-facto patches on a fundamentally flawed architecture.

The reason interoperability and user sovereignty aren't hardcoded into these platforms from day one isn't a technical oversight; it's a feature of venture capital. You cannot compile a monopoly out of open protocols. Capital funds walled gardens, not axiomatic constraints.

Expecting legislation to fix runtime entropy when the compiler itself is owned by the monopolist is a fool's errand. The architecture is working exactly as designed.