frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

First Impressions on Open-Source Claude Security (Strix)

https://theartificialq.github.io/2026/02/28/strix-first-impressions.html
2•bearsyankees•1m ago•0 comments

The Eythos Vision: AI Companions as a Human Right

https://theblairwitchprojects.substack.com/p/the-eythos-vision-ai-companions-as
1•sg17gweedo•1m ago•0 comments

Why No AI Games?

https://franklantz.substack.com/p/why-no-ai-games
1•pavel_lishin•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Orkia – a Rust runtime where AI agents can't bypass governance

https://github.com/orkiaHQ/orkia
1•killix•2m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Flashbang – Sub-1ms DuckDuckGo bang redirects via Service Workers

https://github.com/ph1losof/flashbang
1•t3ntxcles•3m ago•0 comments

Metaprogramming for Madmen (2012)

https://fgiesen.wordpress.com/2012/04/08/metaprogramming-for-madmen/
1•Tomte•3m ago•0 comments

Eshkere

https://www.google.com/imgres?q=%D0%B5%D1%88%D0%BA%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B5&imgurl=https%3A%2F%2Fimg.itc...
1•ILOVETF2•3m ago•3 comments

Is your site agent-friendly?

https://agentprobe.io/
1•kukicola•5m ago•1 comments

Combinatorial Optimization for All: Using LLMs to Aid Non-Experts

https://journal.iberamia.org/index.php/intartif/article/view/2584
1•camilochs•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Pooch PDF – Because Ctrl+P still prints cookie banners in 2026

https://poochpdf.com/
1•membrshiperfect•7m ago•0 comments

How to get large files to your MCP server without blowing up the context window

https://everyrow.io/blog/mcp-large-dataset-upload
3•rafaelpo•7m ago•0 comments

Patterns for Reducing Friction in AI-Assisted Development

https://martinfowler.com/articles/reduce-friction-ai/
1•zdw•8m ago•0 comments

Salt of the Earth: Underground Salt Caverns Just Might Power Our Future

https://eos.org/features/salt-of-the-earth-vast-underground-salt-caverns-are-preserving-our-histo...
1•jofer•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Open-sourced an email QA lib 8 checks across 12 clients in 1 audit call

https://github.com/emailens/engine
1•tikkatenders•9m ago•0 comments

Low-Dose Lithium for Mild Cognitive Impairment: Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaneurology/fullarticle/2845746
1•bookofjoe•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AfterLive – AI digital legacy that lets loved ones hear from you

https://afterlive.ai
1•crawde•11m ago•0 comments

I Used Claude to File My Taxes for Free

https://kachess.dev/taxes/ai/personal-finance/2026/02/27/breaking-up-with-turbotax.html
2•gdudeman•11m ago•0 comments

Israel bombs council choosing Iran's next supreme leader, official says

https://www.axios.com/2026/03/03/iran-supreme-leader-council-israel-strike
1•spzx•12m ago•0 comments

Software development now costs less than than the wage of a minimum wage worker

https://ghuntley.com/real/
1•herbertl•13m ago•1 comments

A [Firefox, Chromium] extension that converts Microsoft to Microslop

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/android/addon/microslop/
3•gaius_baltar•13m ago•0 comments

British Rail settlement plan barcode specs

https://magicalcodewit.ch/rsp-specs/
2•fanf2•13m ago•0 comments

Completing the formal proof of higher-dimensional sphere packing

https://www.math.inc/sphere-packing
1•carnevalem•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Verifiable Interaction Records for Agents

https://github.com/peacprotocol/peac
1•jithinraj•16m ago•0 comments

Ohio EPA weighs allowing data centers to dump wastewater into rivers

https://www.nbc4i.com/news/local-news/columbus/ohio-epa-weighs-allowing-data-centers-to-release-w...
2•randycupertino•17m ago•1 comments

What if LLM uptime was a macroeconomic indicator?

https://lab.sideband.pub/status/
1•shawnyeager•17m ago•0 comments

Watch Out Bluetooth Analysis of the Coros Pace 3 (2025)

https://blog.syss.com/posts/bluetooth-analysis-coros-pace-3/
1•lqueenan•17m ago•0 comments

Risk, in Perspective

https://faingezicht.com/articles/2026/03/02/risk-in-perspective/
1•avyfain•18m ago•0 comments

No mentor? Learn from a 16th century French nobleman

https://www.magicreader.com/montaigne
2•mzelling•18m ago•1 comments

Show HN: I built a way to prove your software kept its promises

https://github.com/nobulexdev/nobulex
1•arian_•19m ago•0 comments

How do I market myself as a freelance Backend/Infrastructure engineer?

1•__0x01•19m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Apple unveils new Studio Display and all-new Studio Display XDR

https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2026/03/apple-unveils-new-studio-display-and-all-new-studio-display-xdr/
89•victorbjorklund•1h ago

Comments

sq_•1h ago
I was curious to see the "Innovative DICOM Medical Imaging" section. I wouldn't have thought that Apple would be interested in niche applications like viewing radiology imaging, but I guess they're probably interested in any cost-insensitive market for these since they're so expensive.
AdamN•1h ago
It's probably an easy win for them. It also might have been a good target when they were ideating on specs. Having these pro certifications gives the devices a halo of premium quality.
geerlingguy•1h ago
Regular consumers probably don't buy these displays in bulk, when you can get very nice displays for less than half the price that are 98% the same on specs.

So targeting checkbox-compliance for places like hospital systems is probably an easy win to generating / keeping some long term contracts.

AdamN•1h ago
I don't think you can get a DICOM-certified display at 5K and 27" for half the price. Probably like $1k less but that's it - and if you're a radiologist making $300k+ you're not going to want to cheap out on a display.
geerlingguy•1h ago
No I'm saying regular consumers don't care about DICOM certification. They care about the other 98% of the specs, and can find a suitable alternative.
sbrother•55m ago
> you can get very nice displays for less than half the price that are 98% the same on specs.

Can you recommend any displays with PPI and brightness equivalent to the studio display, with 120Hz+ refresh rates? I was waiting for this announcement to buy a studio display because I thought they might bring 120Hz to the base model, but $3300 is a lot to spend on a single display. I have an original studio display and a high refresh rate 4K OLED monitor, and they are both compromises unfortunately.

detourdog•26m ago
This also keeps their development targets at the state of the art.
a2tech•57m ago
At a local hospital the radiologists have been all Mac for a long long time. They refused to give it up and resisted all attempts to get them to switch. So it doesn’t surprise me at all.
microtonal•1h ago
Pretty lame that the Studio Display with a height-adjustable stand is still 400 Euro more. My biggest regret is getting my Gen 1 Studio Display without.

Also the non-XDR is only a small upgrade otherwise, no 120Hz, no HDR, only Thunderbolt 5 and a new camera. Finally a downstream Thunderbolt port though.

This is all after 4 years?

mistersquid•1h ago
> Also the non-XDR is only a small upgrade otherwise, no 120Hz, no HDR, only Thunderbolt 5 and a new camera. Finally a downstream Thunderbolt port though.

The camera is still 12MP but offers Desk View. Maybe this is a feature unlocked by the improved onboard A-series chip (A19?).

I wouldn't sniff too hard about Thunderbolt 5. Thunderbolt 5 doubles throughput to 80 Gbps from 40.

Would have loved refresh above 60Hz but then who's gonna get the XDR?

AdamN•1h ago
Yeah if they put everything on the lower end device than nobody would buy the higher end device.
sylens•57m ago
Insanity that a monitor that expensive is stuck at 60Hz
dmix•27m ago
> Pretty lame that the Studio Display with a height-adjustable stand is still 400 Euro more.

just buy a nice one on amazon for $100, it's still VESA mounts

conesus•19m ago
VESA mounts are only a few bucks and give you even better height and tilt adjustment. You also get desk space back. I have a shorter desk (24" vs typical 30" depth) and I have two monitors and a laptop mounted on 3 VESAs and I can extend them so that the monitor edge is inline with the desk edge, giving me the same 24" that a 30" desk would have with a monitor stand.
thiagoperes•1h ago
I got the Kuycon G32P and it’s an incredible alternative. 32in + 6K for less than 2k$

Also works great with other sources like an Xbox

I used a Pro Display XDR as my daily driver at work and the difference is minimal

askonomm•1h ago
I'm really after higher refresh rate than 60, but it seems it would cost me an arm, leg, both kidneys and my newborns to get it at 5k or more resolution.
boxed•1h ago
Hah, the absolute shamelessness of that design and the site is crazy!
zamadatix•23m ago
That's a hefty premium to pay to not also have high refresh or high nits but the higher density options are so thin there's not really much else to go for if getting the resolution density is the goal.
alexarena•1h ago
Sad, but not surprising to see Apple discontinue the Pro Display XDR. Hard to go back to 5K once you’ve used 6K.
AdamN•1h ago
The pixel density is the same I believe - I guess their theory is that 5K is more fungible than a large 6K display since people looking for more real estate can daisy chain the 5K displays.
ErneX•1h ago
Same pixel density, but smaller monitor though.
covercash•1h ago
I vaguely recall an Apple rumor from the last few months about 3 new display model numbers, 2 of them being 27" and one of them being 32"... so still possible a Pro Display XDR refresh is on the horizon.
jakubadamw•1h ago
”Studio Display XDR replaces Pro Display XDR and starts at $3,299 (U.S.) and $3,199 (U.S.) for education.”
dawnerd•45m ago
They'd just call it something else or simply add a new size option for Studio Display XDR like they do Macbooks.
densh•1h ago
I might be the only one, but it's still to this date (and dating all the way back to 2014 with the first iMac 5k display) Apple is the only company that truly gets HIDPI desktop displays with high quality gloss and 200+ ppi at screen this large. In the meantime popular and widely sold gaming screens with matte blur filters and mediocre ppi give me headache and eye fatigue after a few hours of use. Prior generation Studio Display is the only external display that truly worked for text heavy work with my eyes (including software engineering), and I'm sure the latest generation is fantastic as well.
isqueiros•1h ago
You should try some of the newer OLED panels. They're all glossy and look really good.
whatever1•30m ago
Text sucks in oled displays. 200 ppi is not enough to make it look decent.

OLED smartphones have much higher ppi to deal with this.

troupo•1h ago
> Apple is the only company that truly gets HIDPI desktop displays with high quality gloss and 200+ ppi at screen this large.

And somehow they completely forgot how to seamlessly work with displays in general. Connect multiple displays via Thunderbolt? Nope. Keep layouts when switching displays? No. Running any display at more than 60Hz? No. Remember monitor positions? No.

pwthornton•1h ago
Great news. Apple announced a 120hz display today.
troupo•1h ago
There are other 120Hz displays than Apple's.

There are even 240Hz displays.

IIRC Apple couldn't get above 60Hz even on third-party displays they explicitly advertised.

pwthornton•55m ago
There are 5k displays at 240hz?
cosmic_cheese•55m ago
I have an Alienware AW2721D and my M series Macs have no problem driving it at 240hz. macOS picks up that it’s a GSync display and supports VRR on it too.
troupo•50m ago
I could never get my two ASUS displays work at anything but 60Hz
cosmic_cheese•40m ago
My other setup has an ASUS PA278CGV as a secondary monitor and the MBP hooked up to it drives it at 144hz no problem.

Make sure your dock, dongle, and/or cables aren’t bottlenecks.

post_break•29m ago
Driving my LG oled at 120hz over HDMI. What?
eklavya•51m ago
I was using a dell S3225QC with 120 hz and even variable rate with macbook m1 pro. No hdr with 120 or variable rate though, only at 60.
roboror•1h ago
The Studio Display shares a panel with the MSI MPG 271KRAW16
behnamoh•9m ago
Even the new one in this post?
tshaddox•12m ago
I bought that original 5k iMac on release day in 2014. I was thrilled with that display, and stoked to see the entire display industry go the route of true quadruple-resolution just like smartphone displays did.

Sadly, it basically never happened. There was the LG display that came out a couple of years later. It didn't have great reviews, and it was like two thirds the cost of an entire 5k iMac.

It took Apple over 7 years to release their standalone 5k display, and there are a few other true 5k displays (1440p screen real estate with quadruple-resolution, not the ultrawide 2160p displays branded as "5k") on the market now with prices just starting to drop below 1,000 USD.

Unfortunately in that time I've gotten used to the screen real estate of the ultrawide 1440p monitors (which are now ubiquitous, and hitting ridiculous sub-$300 prices). As of now, my perfect display for office work (gaming, video/photo work, or heavy media playback are different topics) would be 21:9 with 1440p screen real estate with quadruple-resolution—essentially just a wider version of that original 5k iMac display.

seanmcdirmid•7m ago
You can get a 27 inch 5k from Asus for $750. A 31.5 inch 6K goes for around $1200. A 28 inch 4K is around $350-$400.
praseodym•2m ago
The hardware is great, but the software is lacking. macOS only supports resolution-based scaling which makes anything but the default 200% pixel scaling mode look bad. For example, with a 27" 4K display many users will want to use 150% or 175% scaling to get enough real estate, but the image will look blurry because macOS renders at a higher resolution and then downscales to the 4K resolution of the screen.

Both Windows and Linux (Wayland) support scaling the UI itself, and with their support for sub-pixel anti-aliasing (that macOS also lacks) this makes text look a lot more crisp.

mark_l_watson•1h ago
wow, the prices have come down. I inherited the old Pro XDR display when my father passed away a couple of years ago: I think he paid $6K for the display and another $1K for the stand.

Off topic, but Apple seems to be dropping hardware costs / capability - relying more in subscription, app store, and cloud now? On an impulse buy, I bought the entry level MacBook Air at Best Buy about two months ago because it was $200 off list price. Amazingly capable laptop for $800.

stetrain•1h ago
It's cheaper but also 27" 5K instead of 32" 6K.

I think it's kind of weird that they didn't just do two size options with similar specs.

ErneX•1h ago
I was hoping for a 6k 32inch model.

But even so, these 2 new monitors still don’t support multiple inputs.

stevenpetryk•1h ago
I've been pretty happy with my ASUS ProArt PA32QCV (32", 6k, but only 60Hz). Kinda infuriating that Apple doesn't let you adjust third-party monitor brightness though (and my work disallows apps like BetterDisplay).
ErneX•54m ago
Thank you, that’s exactly the one I’m going to get now, I was just waiting for these from Apple to be announced to make the decision.
vegardx•46m ago
I'm also a little bummed that they seem to have dropped the Pro Display XDR. I wanted a 32" display as the main display, and then use my existing two Studio Display vertically as secondary on each side.

I guess we're going to see how the support for DP Alt-Mode will be, as I'm not sure how much bandwidth that can provide, so 120Hz might be out of the question. But for now that has been a simple way to get around the lack of multiple display inputs, you just needed a separate KVM switch for it.

asdhtjkujh•29m ago
I just want to natively hook up a PS5 without capture card latency... I would've bought a Studio Display years ago but can't bring myself to purchase a $2000 device-locked monitor.
agys•1h ago
Too small… I got used to my 4K Philips OLED 42" that I hung directly on the wall in front of my desk (no stand at all)… USB-C cable also charges the MacBook. This size is so good to work with; so much screen estate.
desideratum•1h ago
It's mind-boggling that Apple is considering the base 27 inch Studio Display with the same 4 year old panel, but with some new accessories slapped on an "upgrade".
desideratum•1h ago
Oh, and if you want to utilize 120Hz on the XDR display, you're going to have to replace your perfectly functioning Mac.

> Mac models with M1, M1 Pro, M1 Max, M1 Ultra, M2, and M3 support Studio Display XDR at up to 60Hz. All other Studio Display XDR features are supported.

cosmic_cheese•50m ago
Almost certainly due to bandwidth limitations on older versions of Thunderbolt. Full bit depth HDR 5k @ 120hz requires some absurd data thoughput.
realityking•3m ago
I don’t think so. My M3 Pro is on the list as supporting 120 hz but it only has Thunderbolt 4.

Also the base M4 doesn’t habe Thunderbolt 5 and it support 120 hz.

kubik369•40m ago
I don't really see your point. The chips mentioned do not have enough bandwidth on display outputs to support the monitor at 6K@120Hz. If anything, I find it surprising that Apple supports running the display in 60Hz mode instead of telling people to go pound sand and buy new Macs.
cubefox•1h ago
XDR = LCD
testfrequency•1h ago
I’ve owned my nano-textured XDR since launch (with the stand), and I love it.

As the years have gone, the only upgrade I wished to have was 120 refresh for some very limited design work - but 120 really is still not widely adopted in most places anywhere, so it’s really a non-issue for me.

The new XDR is smaller, has a less ergo stand, and also loses the beautiful lattice etchings on the rear which I often admire.

The XDR was overdue for a refresh, it’s nice the price dropped some, but I won’t be upgrading for now.

tiffanyh•1h ago
So Apple essentially introduce a new (middle) price point in their displays:

  $1,500  Studio Display
  $3,300  Studio Display XDR  <-- NEW
  $6,000  Pro Display         <-- DISCONTINUED ???
Apple is amazing at "laddering" people up to the next higher tier.

EDIT: It appears the Pro Display has been discontinued.

cptcobalt•1h ago
it seems like the Pro Display XDR is discontinued. The webpage for that now redirects to the Studio Displays XDR
tiffanyh•1h ago
I can't find it either.

Which means they don't have a 32" display option if true.

Maybe it will also be updated, but on a different day this week?

gbjw•59m ago
On the announcement page, they say "Studio Display XDR replaces Pro Display XDR" in the footnotes, so doubtful.
pfannkuchen•49m ago
They could be considering the new high end display a different product rather than a refresh (for marketing purposes at least).

I recall the XDR being announced alongside the last Mac Pro redesign. No new Mac Pro yet, so maybe they’ll announce the new large display whenever that is announced?

jakubadamw•1h ago
There is a note at the end of the linked announcement:

”Studio Display XDR replaces Pro Display XDR and starts at $3,299 (U.S.) and $3,199 (U.S.) for education.”

gbjw•1h ago
Do they still sell the Pro Display? https://www.apple.com/pro-display-xdr/ redirects to the Studio Display XDR now.
SirMaster•1h ago
Really, a $3300 Mini-LED display in 2026?
post_break•24m ago
Show me an HDR display that is 2000 nits peak HDR calibrated 27" for under $3,300. Not a gaming monitor. Closest you can find is a lilliput UQ31 that has half the nits.
WilcoKruijer•1h ago
> Studio Display XDR replaces Pro Display XDR

How does a 5k display replace a 6k display? Are they giving up on 6k? Disappointing.

iojcde•1h ago
It's a smaller display
JCharante•57m ago
This is awesome! $3299 is a great price drop. I’m moving countries soon and wasn’t going to bring my old monitor, so this is perfect timing.
ErneX•53m ago
It’s a smaller monitor though, the discontinued one was 32 inch 6K resolution, this one is 27 inch 5K resolution.

But it’s the same pixel density.

detourdog•42m ago
I just tried to look up the power usage for XDR and they only list voltage no amps or watts.

Did I miss something

827a•39m ago
> Studio Display XDR replaces Pro Display XDR and starts at $3,299 (U.S.) and $3,199 (U.S.) for education.

My father-in-law is a monitor engineer. He is insanely gifted. We were in a Taiwanese factory together years ago and I asked him what it would cost to build the Pro Display XDR today. I will never forget his answer…

“We can’t, we don’t know how to do it.”

amluto•27m ago
> Featuring extensive connectivity to support a variety of workflows, Studio Display XDR includes two Thunderbolt 5 ports and two USB-C ports.

That is not extensive connectivity. That’s the bare minimum one might credibly expect.

If I were to consider buying a display like this, I would want at least two and preferably more inputs and at least a DisplayPort input. Not everything in the world is USB-C, especially when discrete GPUs are involved.

dmix•27m ago
I might be missing how this differs from the previous model.
sbszllr•13m ago
Daisy chaining finally supported.