frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Universal-3 Pro Streaming

https://www.assemblyai.com/universal-3-pro-streaming
1•handfuloflight•25s ago•0 comments

Show HN: Dracula-AI – A lightweight, async SQLite-backed Gemini wrapper

https://github.com/suleymanibis0/dracula
1•suleymanibis•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Sovereign Trace Stamp – Frozen triple-time cryptographic timestamp

https://github.com/AionSystem/AION-BRAIN/tree/main/projects/sovereign-trace
1•sheldonksalmon•4m ago•0 comments

Cancel ChatGPT AI boycott surges after OpenAI pentagon military deal

https://www.euronews.com/next/2026/03/02/cancel-chatgpt-ai-boycott-surges-after-openai-pentagon-m...
2•nothrowaways•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Demarkus – De-centralized Markup for Us:memory for AI agents and humans

https://github.com/latebit-io/demarkus
1•ontehfritz•10m ago•0 comments

Quantifying the Swiss Marriage Tax

https://gendx.dev/blog/2026/03/02/swiss-marriage-tax.html
1•birdculture•12m ago•0 comments

Migrating 11,000 JavaScript files to TypeScript over 7 years at Patreon

https://www.patreon.com/posts/seven-years-to-typescript-152144830
1•satvikpendem•13m ago•0 comments

Engineering over Enforcement (2023)

https://www.contraption.co/engineering-over-enforcement/
1•mooreds•14m ago•0 comments

The jellyfish knows how to survive uncertain times

https://herbertlui.net/the-jellyfish-knows-how-to-survive-uncertain-times/
1•herbertl•16m ago•0 comments

Obama is right about aliens

https://www.doomsdayscenario.co/p/obama-is-right-about-aliens
1•mooreds•19m ago•0 comments

Life in the Endless Scroll: What We're Losing

https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/life-endless-scroll-what-were-losing-2026a10005od
1•wjb3•19m ago•0 comments

Zen of AI Coding

https://nonstructured.com/zen-of-ai-coding/
2•vinhnx•19m ago•0 comments

Intent-Based Access Control (IBAC) – FGA for AI Agent Permissions

https://ibac.dev
1•ERROR_0x06•20m ago•0 comments

Moving to 199-day validity for public TLS certificates

https://knowledge.digicert.com/alerts/public-tls-certificates-199-day-validity
1•thread_id•23m ago•0 comments

The Wealth of Wall Street with Oren Cass [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SL2aA8cgIB8
1•mooreds•25m ago•0 comments

Eurosky.social accounts – launching early February

https://www.eurosky.tech/register
2•doener•25m ago•0 comments

Spain says we have the necessary resources to contain US trade embargo

https://www.marketscreener.com/news/spanish-government-on-trump-threat-to-cut-trade-we-have-the-n...
2•rguiscard•25m ago•1 comments

Four Decades of Inquiry into the Genetic Bases of Specific Reading Disability

https://pubs.asha.org/doi/epdf/10.1044/2025_JSLHR-25-00050
1•wjb3•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Finqual – Free SEC-based API for fundamentals, insider and 13F data

https://finqual.app/
1•myztika•26m ago•0 comments

Reverse engineering "Hello World" in QuickBASIC 3.0

https://marnetto.net/2026/03/01/brun-hello-world
1•avadodin•27m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: Are you running a free product (pre-revenue)?

1•LeanVibe•27m ago•0 comments

Interactive Fiction Theory and Criticism

https://the-rosebush.com/
1•agnishom•27m ago•0 comments

The evolution of background job frameworks in Ruby

https://riverqueue.com/blog/ruby-queue-history
2•thunderbong•27m ago•0 comments

Tunesia authoritative nameservers for .tn are down

https://www.google.com/
2•NoahZuniga•28m ago•1 comments

"We have made the decision to permanently shut down Highguard."

https://twitter.com/PlayHighguard/status/2028923492125819287
1•minimaxir•28m ago•0 comments

The missing piece for AI coding agents

https://www.buildbuddy.io/blog/remote-bazel-with-agents/
2•jshchnz•28m ago•0 comments

After 8 years on WordPress, I migrated to AstroJS Starlight. Here's the how-to

https://pawelcislo.com/posts/migrating-from-wordpress-to-astrojs-starlight/
1•pyxelr•29m ago•0 comments

Key takeaways from the 2026 State of Software Delivery

https://circleci.com/blog/five-takeaways-2026-software-delivery-report/
1•Illniyar•29m ago•0 comments

Graduate from Single-Session Coding: My Full Agentic Coding Workflow

https://medium.com/@btraut/assemble-your-agent-team-fbfb6b8904b2
1•btraut•30m ago•0 comments

Ketamine may fight chronic fatigue, study suggests

https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-02-ketamine-chronic-fatigue.html
3•PaulHoule•30m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

OpenAI CEO Sam Altman Defends Pentagon Work to Staff

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/openai-ceo-altman-defends-pentagon-work-to-staff-calls-backlash-really-painful-76d769ec
59•cdrnsf•2h ago

Comments

jesse_dot_id•1h ago
It's not quite as bad as working for X, xAI, or Tesla, but engineers continuing to work for these companies are taking hits to their reputation as far as I'm concerned. Like, if I see it on a resume beyond a certain date, I'm not considering them types of reputational damage.
seattle_spring•1h ago
I've seen people saying that about Meta/Facebook for a decade, but I still don't see any tangible damage to former employee's ability to get jobs. The OpenAI situation seems much closer to FB-scale politics than X though.
jesse_dot_id•56m ago
I mostly agree with you re: Meta/Facebook except that things are becoming a lot more politically volatile than they have been in the past. Generally, I think that most people believe that the more intelligent you are, the more empathetic you are, so at some point if your evil company is doing big destructive evils, the smartest engineers will probably bail.
peyton•48m ago
Depending on jurisdiction, it’s maybe not that smart to hop on the internet and write “if I see it on a resume beyond a certain date, I'm not considering them” and “things are becoming a lot more politically volatile” either.
GlacierFox•32m ago
"Generally, I think that most people believe that the more intelligent you are, the more empathetic you are..."

Okay, you might need to re-evaluate the life lessons you seem to have selectively taught yourself. This is base line culture war 'You must be mentally deficient if you don't align with what I deem to be empathetic right now or I don't think you're nice enough' type stuff.

High school type shit.

jesse_dot_id•25m ago
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S01602...
rybosworld•52m ago
I think Amazon is a better example. It's a thing that some companies prefer not to hire engineers from Amazon because of the culture they bring. Whether you agree with it or not, Amazon has a reputation for a toxic culture and that sort of thing can ruin a smaller or medium size company if it seeps in.
KK7NIL•42m ago
OP wasn't talking about culture, he was talking about discriminating due to differences in political opinions, very different.
jesse_dot_id•35m ago
*ethical opinions
parl_match•45m ago
> but I still don't see any tangible damage to former employee's ability to get jobs

I have. I've also seen it happen for Uber, for someone who worked on the god mode project that went viral for being used at holiday parties.

onesociety2022•41m ago
I assume you work at some small startup where you get to dictate who you will hire based on your interpretation of what a candidate’s past work history tells you about their morals/ethics. But that shit won’t fly if you are interviewing at other large companies. You can’t reject someone just because they have OpenAI on their resume. In fact I have never heard of any FAANG company ever blacklisting candidates from some other company. So you rejecting someone is not going to move the needle much. They can leave OpenAI whenever they want and Zuck will offer them 8-9 figure pay packages :)
kuang_eleven•33m ago
Oh, you absolutely can; maybe not as a matter of formal policy, but if you are a hiring manager or a member of an interview team, you have wide latitude to have concerns about nearly anything (legal) about a candidate. And also, even if you don't use that explicitly, it can affect your judgement of them when discussing them to an interview committee.
mathisfun123•26m ago
lol absolutely none of these things will fly on an interview feedback in any big company

> even if you don't use that explicitly, it can affect your judgement of them when discussing them to an interview committee

my friend that's literally unethical.

aaronbrethorst•20m ago
Bad news, Voltaire didn't actually say that thing about 'defending your speech to the death.'
mathisfun123•8m ago
i'm not defending anyone's speech - i'm saying just because other people are assholes doesn't mean i should become one.
Arainach•17m ago
> absolutely none of these things will fly on an interview feedback in any big company

Sure, you never write "no hire because they worked at Palantir". You write "candidate didn't ask clarifying questions about {X} and jumped to answer {Y} which is not what I expect from a candidate of this level, no hire".

....this assumes that anyone at all reads your detailed notes if you submit an initial rating of "no hire", and I have very little evidence from my interviewing career across multiple companies to believe that's the case..

mathisfun123•13m ago
yea totally - in response to someone else's unethical choices i myself will choose to be unethical? because two wrongs make a right? correct?

> this assumes that anyone at all reads your detailed notes if you submit an initial rating of "no hire"

the director of my org (inside of FAANG) reads all of our interview feedback if we make an offer.

thierrydamiba•23m ago
This thread is simultaneously horrifying and hilarious at the same time.

Hilarious because onesociety2022 seems so earnest. Someone who is shocked at the idea that job search isn’t a pure meritocracy.

Horrifying because kuang_eleven points out just how easy it is to pass a qualified candidate if you want to.

The truth is somewhere in the middle…

himata4113•36m ago
Honestly, would be the complete opposite for me if I was an interviewer (thankfully I am not and never will). You don't want fussy employees.
ihaveajob•34m ago
So you want yes-men in your team?
ecshafer•7m ago
No, you just dont want people that will start interrupting work, causing a ruckus, starts signing open letters, or randomly quits based on whatever blue sky post they read last.
nickthegreek•30m ago
not working at xAI makes you a fussy employee?
trinsic2•19m ago
Yeah I don't work for fussy employers either. (Sarcasm) the shit goes both ways brother.
game_the0ry•33m ago
This is so lame.

Don't judge employees for what their CEOs do bc they do not have a choice in the matter.

That resume you toss might be someone that needs to pay a mortgage, has a sick wife, or autistic kid that needs the insurance. Or it could come from an employee who genuinely disagrees with mission and quit, but its not like you would know or even care.

What if your CEO went politically rogue and started openly supporting Trump? Would you quit? I doubt that.

What a childish attitude. Get your politics TF out of the office and remember the fact that we live in a democracy where sometimes you do not get your way.

paulryanrogers•25m ago
> What if your CEO went politically rogue and started openly supporting Trump? Would you quit? I doubt that.

Yes. I would. Trump is a uniquely dangerous president with uniquely unrestrained power.

I'll continue to write my representatives, publicly protest, boycott businesses and employers, and use all other legal levers of power that I can. My kids future cannot afford to let these crimes continue unchecked.

> Get your politics TF out of the office...

A large portion of our lives is spent at the office, with people we may not otherwise interact with. Former coworkers sharing their perspectives helped sow the seeds of my change in politics, both on individual issues and worldview.

It's childish to think life can be perfectly compartmentalized, like pre-K learning stations.

politician•13m ago
In your understanding of the constitution, is the executive branch subordinate to the other two branches?
trinsic2•22m ago
People said the same thing with the Nazi Regime. Im sorry at some point, you have to stop supporting a system that is destroying peoples lives. You cannot sit idly by and watch it happen because you need to pay bills.
game_the0ry•6m ago
There are no death camps or gas chambers in America. Main stream media has you brain washed.

And I doubt you're doing anything about except posting your opinion on the internet. How brave.

iugtmkbdfil834•33m ago
I don't get it. Interesting problems are interesting problems. Granted, I don't think you see those at X, but xAI, Tesla or Meta? Sure. I am not even arguing 'money' or 'man gotta eat', but just seems like such an arbitrary thing to flag.. especially since it won't be documented anywhere ( 'we are anti-Tesla house' banner on main page for example).

It is silly.

whattheheckheck•21m ago
It ain't silly. You're working for Hitler
driscoll42•14m ago
Interesting problems don't exist in a vacuum. I'm sure it was an interesting problem to figure out how to track people who opted out of tracking, how to build gas chambers, how to add lead to gasoline, doesn't mean one should choose to solve them.
Arainach•12m ago
If we are going to claim to be software "engineers" we have ethical obligations. That means that you don't just do whatever the person signing your paycheck says, you raise objections and refuse to do things that will cause harm.

In real engineering disciplines, engineers sign their name to key decisions and if people get hurt someone loses their license and their right to do engineering work. The world would be a better place if software worked that way, although it'd be harder for a bunch of sociopaths to become billionaires.

tombert•1h ago
The backlash is "painful"? Maybe don't make a moralizing tweet about your principles only to change them three hours later. It comes off as opportunistic grifting.

I don't blame the OpenAI staff (and as far as I am aware most people don't). Most of us end up working for assholes if you go far enough up the chain, but it's different when the CEO tries to earn social credit by having his principles, only to seize on an opportunity and just ignore those principles. He can say "oh well they pinky swore they wouldn't abuse this or redefine laws to say what they're doing is 'lawful'", but I personally would have trouble trusting the words of a convicted fraudster lolcow that we decided to elect as president and an alcoholic Fox News host. I guess that makes me a "radical leftist" though, I'm sure that the 10000 IQ people always trust convicted criminals.

I'm sure Sam Altman will make his money, and I'm sure that OpenAI will continue to take over the world like before, but I don't have to fund it myself, hence why I canceled my ChatGPT Plus and signed up for Claude. I'm sure that the CEO for that company will be a douche eventually too, but at least as of right now he seems to have a shrapnel of integrity.

I can't read most of the article because most of the common archiving sites don't appear to work.

df2dfs•1h ago
"I'm sure that OpenAI will continue to take over the world like before"

Each day that goes by Im more convinced OAI will not be a healthy going-concern without government help, which most likely will not be granted.

tombert•57m ago
I dunno. They were valued last week at $700+ billion weren't they? When you have that kind of capital available I'm not entirely sure how possible it even is to go bankrupt.

Regardless, my point is that one dude canceling his $20/month subscription probably isn't going to affect anything, but it's basically all I can do.

df2dfs•55m ago
"They were valued last week at $700+ billion weren't they?" So?

The money they have available is what is on the balance sheet, which they are burning right-through whilst facing immense competition and never-ending reinvestment, given that Google will carry on doing so. Cash flows from operations is a big fat negative.

I see Google first killing OAI, then eventually doing the same to Anthropic, once they figure out a suite of products that truly revolutionises the work of a sofware engineer beyond just talking to a chat interface, and bundle it into their existing offerings for enterprise.

tombert•51m ago
I guess I just feel like when you're worth that much, you can be unprofitable for a very long time before it catches up with you. That's my perspective anyway, I could be wrong.

I agree that if anyone is going to kill OpenAI it's likely Google. They have even more funding and already have giant training indexes for search that they could likely leverage to improve their models in a way that OpenAI can't.

browningstreet•34m ago
The money they raised is basically already spent.
CamperBob2•28m ago
On DRAM that hasn't even been fabbed yet. :(
df2dfs•18m ago
Trying to create shortages etc is just typical Scam Altman behaviour and really speaks to how vulnerable he feels against Google's might.

There was a point where Google's existence was questioned, but they've been working away quietly and they'll win the long game. Altman viewed OAI as a way to reduce Google's AI dominance - I think when we look back in history it'll turn out he made it worse. Google wasn't all that interested in releasing LLMs out into the wild.

strangattractor•51m ago
The "Backlash" he is referring to is people canceling their OpenAI accounts and going to Claude. And by "Painful" he means less money. - Professional CEO Sam Speak Interpreter
tombert•43m ago
I mean, I guess. It's not like they're profitable yet are they? At least not at the consumer level as far as I am aware. Me canceling my subscription might have saved them money.

Honestly I think these tech billionaires are very thin-skinned and they don't like people saying mean things about them, and I think a lot of them are completely unable to reconcile this simple fact: when you're a billionaire, you don't fucking get to have a normal life.

You didn't have to get billions of dollars of wealth. If you get into a situation like that, then yes your actions are going to be scrutinized more than a nobody like me. People are going to call you an asshole when you do asshole things more than when some random nobody does something assholey. You chose to be popular and powerful; if you don't like that then there's no law saying you can't get a regular 9-5 job like the rest of us.

mcswell•48m ago
> don't make a moralizing tweet about your principles only > to change them three hours later.

I have no inside scoop, but it sure looks like this was all pre-arranged. Altman made a better offer to Hegseth/ Trump (or offered some other "inducement"), so Hegseth found this way to weasel out of the contract with Anthropic. I don't see how this all would have transpired that quickly otherwise. And of course the fact that three days later OpenAI reportedly got the same contingencies on its contract that were the supposed reason for cancelling Anthropic's contract just looks wrong.

tombert•44m ago
Entirely possible, though I think it might have been that Anthropic wanted extra guarantees outside of what was "lawful".

The stuff that Altman mentioned seemed to indicate that they'll support the US government as long as the US government is following the law, ignoring the "if the president does it it's not illegal" mentality that this administration appears to be taking.

ranger_danger•1h ago
> Access is temporarily restricted

> We detected unusual activity from your device or network.

Anyone have an alternative link? The archive.* sites are also an endless captcha loop for me unfortunately. And no I am not using any VPN or CF DNS/etc.

mcswell•46m ago
I'm getting lots of that "We detected unusual activity from your device or network" lately. I even went through my ISP to change my IP address, to no effect. If there really is "unusual activity", I wish they'd be a bit more specific.
SockThief•36m ago
I usually skip WSJ articles because of that, but this worked when I checked:

https://smry.ai/proxy?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wsj.com%2Ftech%2...

PS. I can't be sure if it's the whole article, not just some AI summary thou.

vldszn•33m ago
I built a website that shows a timeline of recent events involving Anthropic, OpenAI, and the U.S. government.

Posted here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47195085

globalnode•29m ago
blaming open ai emps is like blaming current germans for ww2. that sort of collective moral guilt, sometimes even inherited, is simply unfair and stupid. i get that people want to undermine companies' support structure and that their dream is probably to guilt shame open ai's employees into quitting. but it feels like people trying to score points for their own agenda, claim the moral high ground, and label entire groups of people with some sort of guilt by association. its fake. its a game. and they know it.
OJFord•13m ago
I don't like the analogy anyway, but why 'current Germans'? Surely 'pre-enrolled rank and file of the contemporary military' would be more apt?
rcoder•5m ago
But we’re not taking about a 80-year gap here (“blaming modern Germans”); we’re talking about people who are in the global top 5% of income and prestige choosing _today_ to contribute to these organizations.

If you believe that your labor is worth something — which I’m pretty sure this crowd does — by working for a given firm, you’re voting with the value of your time in support of what your employer does.

Which, to be clear, is 100% your choice! I’m not going to accuse anyone of being a “bad person” because they decide that stable, high-paying employment is more important than taking a particular ethical (or political) stand at work.

But it _is_ a choice that you make every day by showing up for work.

In my view this is even more relevant for tech workers who receive equity. If you’re a shareholder in addition to being an employee, you’re now voting _twice_ in favor of what management is doing, and benefitting directly from both pay and ownership.