[dupe] Discussion on source: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47225130

"Dumb fucks". Honestly... Volenti non fit iniuria.

Privacy-wise, isn't this completely on-brand and expected from Meta? Is anyone surprised by these kinds of revelations?

Water is wet. Grass is green.

It's cheaper for them to settle in a lawsuit than what they are gaining by doing this. If it wasn't, they wouldn't. The laws are broken.

"using the bathroom" will be the least of what they're watching people do. Anyone wearing these glasses (or similar) should know that all of the audio/video picked up by the glasses will be watched and analyzed by others, likely by AI as well. Just like the entire point of facebook is to spy on people and profit from that data, the entire point of these devices is to spy on people in ways that the facebook app doesn't/can't and profit from that data.

Anyone wearing these glasses in public should be punched in the face. Especially public transport.

How many times will the same report be regurgitated and reposted? There is nothing added here that the original source didn't cover already (https://www.svd.se/a/K8nrV4/metas-ai-smart-glasses-and-data-...). Read that instead of the derivative blogspam.

Meta does Meta things (again). People surprised (again).

Won't this cause significant legal issues in two party consent states and have a huge potential to run afoul of revenge porn laws?

Source: Someone who says that someone said that someone anonymous said. (Literally)