In this manuscript, I try to explain clearly what C-space is and why i believe the simple postulate Rω=c may be far more fundamental than it first appears. Following its consequences led me to results i was not originally chasing, including emergent relations for electron mass, charge, the coupling Alpha (1/137..), and several other physical quantities.
My view is becoming increasingly simple: the missing key behind quantum gravity may not be a more complicated structure, it's a simpler one, the idea that wave-function evolution is locked to the speed of light through. simple, but powerful!!
At this point, i think the theory deserves serious reading from physicists willing to examine it carefully and, if it holds up, advocate for it. I've been developing it largely independently, and i hope to eventually present it in seminars as well. If the situation in Iran changes, i believe that moment may finally be possible.
If you read it, I’d especially value criticism on the mathematical structure, physical interpretation, and whether the emergence claims are genuinely nontrivial.
I can pretty much tell that it's very unlikely to find a Lagrangian that leads to a closed-form formula for the electron mass (on loop in C-space model), then give proton mass in (N=3) and electroweak scale in N=4:
pajuhaan•1h ago
My view is becoming increasingly simple: the missing key behind quantum gravity may not be a more complicated structure, it's a simpler one, the idea that wave-function evolution is locked to the speed of light through. simple, but powerful!!
At this point, i think the theory deserves serious reading from physicists willing to examine it carefully and, if it holds up, advocate for it. I've been developing it largely independently, and i hope to eventually present it in seminars as well. If the situation in Iran changes, i believe that moment may finally be possible.
If you read it, I’d especially value criticism on the mathematical structure, physical interpretation, and whether the emergence claims are genuinely nontrivial.
I can pretty much tell that it's very unlikely to find a Lagrangian that leads to a closed-form formula for the electron mass (on loop in C-space model), then give proton mass in (N=3) and electroweak scale in N=4:
Electron: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17219278
Proton: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18108075
Bosons: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18769332