15:I[981,["658","static/chunks/658-a698693f56d0116a.js","183","static/chunks/183-6beeeb801c274aaa.js","474","static/chunks/app/%5Btype%5D/layout-631c4730b83c8223.js"],"Posts"] 16:T51c,We scanned 39 agent frameworks against the OWASP Agentic AI Top 10. 13 FAIL, 17 WARN, 9 PASS. Open Interpreter scored 80/100 risk. AutoGPT 65. Even LangChain flagged WARN for prompt injection vectors.

MCP has no identity layer. No message signing. No tool integrity. 41% of MCP servers have zero authentication (TapAuth research). CVE-2025-6514 scored CVSS 9.6.

MCPS adds a cryptographic security layer on top of MCP – like TLS for HTTP:

- Agent Passports (ECDSA P-256 signed identity) - Message signing (every JSON-RPC call wrapped in signed envelope) - Tool integrity (signed definitions prevent poisoning) - Replay protection (nonce + timestamp window) - Trust levels L0-L4 (enforce minimum per server) - Real-time revocation via Trust Authority

Mitigates 8/10 OWASP MCP risks. Zero dependencies.

npm install mcp-secure pip install mcp-secure

Background: I filed OWASP security assessments against LangChain (github.com/langchain-ai/langchain/issues/35803) and other frameworks. The LangChain community implemented AST filtering fixes based on the findings. That work led to building MCPS as the protocol-level fix.

Full spec: github.com/razashariff/mcps/blob/main/SPEC.md Scan results for all 39 agents: mcp-secure.dev/#registry17:T6b2,I run a platform where indie developers or small startup can share pre-revenue services and get early users and feedback before turning them into real businesses.

From Reddit, Indie Hackers, Hacker News, and even people around me, I can clearly see that many indie builders are building free tools and want to show them to others. Many also hope to turn them into businesses later. So I believe the demand definitely exists.

However, a platform is very different from a tool.

I’ve built many tools before, and some of them have reached mill

Unlimited Claude Code or just token reuse confusion?