It turns out that ~70% of checkouts get abandoned due to a lack of trust signals. 1 in 5 people will abandon a page simply because it doesn't feel secure. For indie software, "secure" means knowing the founder didn't abandon the project 6 months ago.Users find your tool, they're ready to drop money on a yearly sub, but they have no clue if anyone is actually still home.
GitPulse bridges that gap. It gives founders a way to prove their project is alive and gives users peace of mind before hitting "subscribe".
Privacy note: It only reads metadata. For paid users, it processes commit messages on the fly to classify work (e.g., "Maintenance", "Features"), but it never reads, stores, or caches your actual source code. You can even anonymize private repos to show activity without revealing the project name.
Queue/Jobs: Redis and BullMQ handle the background job system to fetch and sync data without hitting rate limits.
Frontend/Backend: Built with [e.g., Next.js, React, and TailwindCSS].
Database: [e.g., PostgreSQL / Supabase] for storing the generated metadata profiles.
I’d love to hear what you guys think about this angle. Does showing a "verified active dev" trust factor actually help you decide whether to buy a tool from a solo founder?
bombashell•1h ago
What is it?
I built GitPulse, a tool that turns your GitHub activity into clean, embeddable badges and developer/repository profiles to show the real "pulse" of your projects. To avoid subscription fatigue, the pricing is straightforward.
Pricing:
1. Free Tier: For public profiles, showing your last 365 days of activity.
2. Pro ($9 Lifetime Deal): A single payment for automated syncs, private repo support (with optional anonymization), and commit classification. No monthly fees.