frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Everyone is focusing on AI, we're focusing on humans

1•ayoubdrissi•1m ago•0 comments

ByteDance suspends launch of Seedance 2.0 after copyright disputes

https://www.reuters.com/technology/bytedance-suspends-launch-video-ai-model-after-copyright-dispu...
1•amrrs•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: MailParse – Inbound email to structured JSON via API

https://www.mailparse.dev
1•eibrahim•2m ago•0 comments

Ek_ Leaks Persist

1•safteylayer•2m ago•0 comments

A Preview of Coalton 0.2

https://coalton-lang.github.io/20260312-coalton0p2/
1•varjag•3m ago•0 comments

How "Hardwired" AI Will Destroy Nvidia's Empire and Change the World

https://medium.com/@mokrasar/the-last-chip-how-hardwired-ai-will-destroy-nvidias-empire-and-chang...
1•amelius•3m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Replacing $50k manual forensic audits with a deterministic .py engine

1•cd_mkdir•4m ago•0 comments

Validation is your agent's bottleneck

https://www.nicowil.me/posts/the-missing-validation-layer/
1•justaregulardev•5m ago•1 comments

Visual React Layout Builder

https://reactorlowcode.com/
1•borges_sensei•5m ago•1 comments

Why DuckDuckGo is building its own web search index

https://insideduckduckgo.substack.com/p/duck-tales-why-duckduckgo-is-building
2•twapi•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI coding agent for VS Code with pay-as-you-go pricing- no subscription

https://www.llmonestop.com/#pricing
1•hhossain•10m ago•0 comments

Why Switzerland is a 3rd world country

https://medium.com/leapfrog/why-switzerland-is-a-3rd-world-country-7fe5d67a079
1•nothrowaways•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: My OS can run Doom

https://monolith-project.org/blog/march-2026-update/
1•mrunix•11m ago•0 comments

Ethical Web Principles

https://www.w3.org/TR/ethical-web-principles/
1•jruohonen•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Han – A Korean programming language written in Rust

https://github.com/xodn348/han
8•xodn348•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: ZaneOps, A beautiful and fast self hosted alternative to Vercel

https://zaneops.dev/
2•fredkisss•14m ago•1 comments

Anthropic invests $100M into the Claude Partner Network

https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-partner-network
2•gmays•16m ago•0 comments

Cursor billed us $450 for a seat that existed for seconds

https://cursor.com
1•primex•16m ago•2 comments

You Can Just Deploy Things

https://nickdichev.com/blog/you-can-just-deploy-things/
2•nickdichev•18m ago•0 comments

Valyris – startup valuation using 7 VC frameworks

https://valyris.app
2•itsmaxn•19m ago•2 comments

The Advanced .exrc File (1991)

http://urbanjost.altervista.org/LIBRARY/public_html/VI/exrc_files/exrc_ADVANCED.html
1•turtleyacht•22m ago•0 comments

Jared Kushner Solicits Funds for His Firm While Working as Mideast Envoy

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/13/business/jared-kushner-affinity-mideast-funds.html
3•johnbarron•23m ago•1 comments

A Regular Person Can Utilize AI Agents

https://weightythoughts.com/p/how-a-regular-person-can-utilize
1•gmays•25m ago•0 comments

Show HN: ngrep – grep plus word embeddings

https://github.com/0xNaN/ngrep
3•xnan•25m ago•1 comments

Postgres with Builtin File Systems

https://db9.ai/
2•ngaut•26m ago•0 comments

Arther OS – Web desktop environment on the AT Protocol

https://www.aetheros.computer/
2•thek3nger•27m ago•1 comments

America gamified its war with Iran

https://www.axios.com/2026/03/14/the-gamification-of-war
3•0in•30m ago•0 comments

In search of Banksy, Reuters found the artist took on a new identity

https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/global-art-banksy/
4•Tomte•32m ago•1 comments

Making

https://beej.us/blog/data/ai-making/
3•jllyhill•34m ago•0 comments

Show HN: AI Toys that don't need the internet

https://github.com/akdeb/open-toys/blob/main/README.md
1•akadeb•35m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Head of FCC threatens broadcaster licenses over critical coverage of Iran war

https://twitter.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/2032855414233047172
84•theahura•2h ago
https://xcancel.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/203285541423304717...

Comments

jmclnx•1h ago
A better link:

https://xcancel.com/BrendanCarrFCC/status/203285541423304717...

BTW, the link is a waste of your time reading it, it is just the current US regime whining again.

g-mork•1h ago
I've read so much trump spam recently that on reading this my first thought was that you misspelled winning hehe

Planet announced last week there will be a 14 day delay on all commercial satellite imagery from the middle east. It shocks me how transparent we are about information war and voluntarily lying to ourselves at particular moments

decimalenough•1h ago
No, this is deeply disturbing. The person "whining" is the head of the regulatory body that gets to decide what can be broadcast, a supposedly non-partisan role, and yet he's just straight up threatened to cancel the licenses of everybody who's not vocally supportive of what you term the current regime.
theahura•1h ago
thanks, I should've used xcancel. @dang I would love if we could update to using this link instead
Jtsummers•1h ago
xcancel is like archive links, they prefer links to the original with bypasses/alternatives in comments.
allears•1h ago
Well there's a clear 1st Amendment violation. Wonder if he'll get sued, and if so, wonder if the plaintiff will win, and if so, whether Carr will abide by any judgment.
pstuart•1h ago
The irony of this would be quite amusing if it wasn't so dangerous. Where are all the "free speech absolutists" now?
refulgentis•1h ago
HN was such an interesting place in 2024, they’ve all disappeared, sadly.

I’ve been genuinely, deeply, curious where those posters went. It was the site at that point.

The most I’ve seen in months and months is a limp-wristed handwave at “but humans have gooned and been racist forever”, in response to someone saying they wouldn’t choose to work for X.ai because it accelerates those things.

My most substantive idea is it was an unsustainable coalition, and that’s why we’re not seeing it much. You need to be for an ugly conjunction of things instead of against “woke” and Columbia students, thus you won’t get coalition-wide social approval (upvotes) anymore.

So they’re almost certainly here, but, downvoted to the point of invisibility unless you scour every comment.

Another case study to ponder is our host’s CEO, Gary Tan. Full-on loud-throated American juche stuff at beginning of tariffs. Now he has his own political website he built with Claude. And it’s LLM-generated articles that are riffs on Free Press articles he liked and they’re really tediously boring niche stuff even if you’re full in on team red, even before the AI writing cringe effect on the reader. Ex. “Mackenzie bezos philanthropy is fake and destructive because one college that got money hired the college presidents son and also enrollment dropped the next year”

exceptione•1h ago
You can be intelligent and believe the narratives.

You can be intelligent and see you were fooled, seeing the sponsors of the narratives don't share any of your ideals to begin with.

Many are confused, feeling betrayed, open for new perspectives. Some will double down as we know from group dynamics in sects.

Don't feel sad, it is a good sign of healthy progress. Project 2025 and the likes are a very destructive force, not something to gamble your democracy on.

jacquesm•1h ago
Well, we have a bunch of really problematic accounts on HN and I suspect that rather than to go into 'endless curious conversation' with those characters people just give up at some point. It's interesting in a way because one of PGs most famous post is the one about 'no broken windows'.
pstuart•46m ago
I'm all for having conversations with those having other viewpoints, but it doesn't seem to be possible when they don't argue in good faith (or even grounded in reality).

I take zero pleasure in saying this, but "the other side" is fucking insane. There's no arguing from first principles, let alone acknowledging that there are issues of concern with one's propositions.

In the case of "free speech", there's a failure to acknowledge the fundamental proposition of it when used in the US -- in that it's about the government not being able to prosecute you for speech that it doesn't like. This is literally the basis of the OP.

I'm a fan of Christopher Hitchens and he embodied that "free speech absolutism" argument convincingly (as otherwise its a pathway to censorship and oppression), but I think it's also important to recognize Karl Popper's Intolerance of Intolerance.

This stuff is no longer idle speculation -- it is an active facet of authoritarianism that is playing out around us right now.

jacquesm•32m ago
Indeed, and it is interesting how all those countries that have seen this up close have reasonable upper limits and courts that will try to find a balance without falling over one way or the other. Obviously you won't be able to please everybody all the time but we're - as you so eloquently put it - no longer in a speculative domain but in one where you can see the consequences play out in realtime.

It's like toddlers with guns, they may not know exactly how the guns work but they're bloody dangerous all the same.

Popper has it right, far more so than most other philosophers because he's coming at it almost from a security perspective: the system will have holes and you need to be willing to be pragmatic about that, rather than dogmatic.

My solution for HN is simple by the way, I give up, but one account at the time and I simply block them. That doesn't help the site but it does help my blood pressure. The one I use is called 'Comments owl for HN'.

gjsman-1000•1h ago
Airwaves are not protected by the 1st amendment, due to the limited amount of bandwidth that physically exists. As such, the FCC has extraordinary powers, including enforcing watersheds, forcing children’s content hours (“E/I”), censoring the F-bomb, and enforcing a 7-second delay on live content to prevent another Timberlake Super Bowl.

The first amendment also does not apply to highway billboards; which is why you never see a vagina on the roadway. Not all government control of speech is oppressive or inconsistent.

jacquesm•1h ago
Maybe if we're going to name the department of defense the department of war we can go all the way and rename the FCC to the 'ministry of propaganda'?

A free press is worth its weight in gold. If you let go of that you're going to lose more than you bargain for. All those free speech advocates are a bit quiet on this, wonder what happened to them.

matthewdgreen•1h ago
It would obviously be the Ministry of Truth.
tombert•1h ago
I assumed it would the the Ministry of Trump. He likes putting his name on things.
jacquesm•1h ago
You're probably right.
Bender•1h ago
That was already taken by the DHS and then dismantled in 2022.
skeledrew•1h ago
Is a free press even worth anything of the country is already otherwise lost?
jacquesm•1h ago
Yes, because it is a backbone through which people trying to hold things together can communicate. Remember how the USSR supposedly held together and could not be defeated, and how the Nazi's overran Europe and there were many who figured the easy way out was to just give up and accept it? The free press held the line, in Western Europe through underground newspapers, which made a massive difference in keeping people informed and in the East between 45 and ~86 through the various - sometimes hand copied - smuggled literature.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_media_in_German-oc...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Samizdat

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underground_press

Soldarity would have never gotten off the ground without that network and speaking for my own country I suspect that without de Volkskrant and Het Parool the war would have gotten much closer to completely eradicating the Jewish population here. It was bad enough as it was but the network that coordinated the distribution of the underground newspapers was also instrumental in keeping the underground resistance network going. The one fed off the other and vice versa, both as a training ground and as a messenger service. Lots of those stories will never be told (unfortunately) but there were a ton of very brave people that knew full well they risked a one-way trip to the dunes if discovered.

johnsmith1840•1h ago
I mean it's not like any administration was any different? Numerous stories all over of how propoganda from US admins demicrat and republican flood the systems.

And that's just the stuff we know. You don't think AI propoganda bots are flooding every social media you know of?

Traditional news media has a totally wrecked credibility on both sides. If we are subsidizing what is clearly a dying market why not stop?

I trust social media posts as much as Fox news or CNN (very little) which maybe is a me thing but I don't think I'm alone.

Best news I can find now is finding one individual person whose personal reputation still can matter and follow them.

jacquesm•1h ago
> I mean it's not like any administration was any different?

If you really believe that then I don't think we're going to have much to discuss.

This is not one of those 'both sides' discussions. This is a current affairs discussion.

johnsmith1840•46m ago
Ok I guess? I find it hard not to see democrats heavily pushing for anti free speech across numerous systems.

Simplest points are: 1. Hate speech 2. Covid 3. Europe as a whole (correlation)

Hard to say america is terrible for free speech when you contrast it with the more liberal europeans that actively arrest on hate speech. If more extreeme democrats had their way we'd 100% be arresting people for hate speech.

I agree with the covid ones because to be honest people are dumb. But it's dishonest to say only trump is after free speech.

If you think trump is big bad then you need to realize the trumpers have thought the SAME about your party for like a decade now. In their eyes they are just returning the favor.

jacquesm•26m ago
Yes, (1) dogwhistle for 'racism is ok' (2) my bodily autonomy beats you staying alive (3) see (1).

Note that I'm not an American, but I know a grifter and an asshole when I see one and trump is both, without a doubt. If you believe the two parties in the USA are equal in this sense then you are willfully blind at this point.

The number of people that are comfortable with outright racism and xenophobia on HN is scary, the number of people that are unable to see the hand behind the curtain during a time when we were very vulnerable and who seem to take their personal comfort above the health of others is scary as well. But I guess that what you get when you tell a good chunk of the world that they are movie stars authors and celebrities.

COVID was interesting: as pandemics go this was a mild one, and yet, we fucked it up and here you are using it as a plank in your argument that the government has too much power. Sorry, but if that was your takeaway then you really were not paying attention and you probably have no clue about biology.

If you have the time and the spare cash go buy the book Spillover, read it and then check the date when it was written. Also realize that it is about the next pandemic, not the previous one. It probably won't do your sleep any good but at least you'll be a bit better informed.

Clearly you're not stupid, this comment:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46983287

was on the money. Now follow the money and see where it leads.

Also, and final note on this: from the perspective of many other countries the USA has a one party system, with one party as a milder version of the other, but that doesn't mean that that not-so-mild version does not have some material differences, and that some of those differences may well lead to destabilizing the country on a scale not seen since the last few hundred years.

thrance•55m ago
During a press conference yesterday, Hegseth, the secretary of war, received a question on Iran from CNN that he didn't feel the need to answer, and then went on a rant about how he can't wait for Ellison to buy the network and rid it of any opposition to the regime [1]. He literally spelt it out.

Free press in the US is already dead, all media belongs to conservative pedophile oligarchs who use it to manipulate the masses and push their warmongering narratives.

> All those free speech advocates are a bit quiet on this, wonder what happened to them.

There are no principled free speech advocates on the right, only people who have an issue with the media not being completely controlled by their side. Their silence then makes perfect sense: they are getting exactly what they wanted.

[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/media-telecom/pentagon-chie...

jacquesm•22m ago
Yes, they are no longer even pretending to hide, I think that's the thing that really changed. Up to a few years ago there would always be the figleaf. Now, they're just stating openly what they're up to and nobody bats an eye. It's an extreme case of the normalization of deviance. And in a way that is the answer to that age old question: "How could they let it happen?" when contemplating Germany ca. 1936.
jauntywundrkind•1h ago
It's deplorable that there's such empty silence on Carr and his incessant snowflake whining from the right. For a party that has crowed so much about 1A! It's unfathomable, just depraved, to have a party that will complain and whine so loudly, and then have nothing at all to say when you have a FCC commissioner asserting that broadcast rights means saying only what the government says is good.

Utterly deplorable. This man is a high traitor to the constitution and this nation. And the right: seemingly AWOL, on an issue they claimed was so important! It's so fallen. It's so unfortunate the nation haa to be sundered by people of so low moral and political regard, people who seemingly care so little about values and democracy and the nation.

suzzer99•1h ago
> For a party that has crowed so much about 1A!

Just like the anti-war stuff, it was always convenient hypocrisy that they instantly abandon when the time is right.

650REDHAIR•26m ago
If it wasn’t for double standards they wouldn’t have any at all.

We’ve seen it every 4-8 years for decades.

curt15•1h ago
"Should the government censor speech it doesn't like? Of course not. The FCC doesn't have a roving mandate to police speech in the name of the \"public interest\"." -- Brendan Carr 2019
matthewdgreen•1h ago
So much of the last four years was watching fools and dishonest people pretend that the government was coming to take away your free speech and you'd better elect [people who routinely lied about everything and clearly had no principles] to protect you.
verdverm•1h ago
Every accusation is an admission from the people running the united states right now
johnsmith1840•1h ago
Wait there was active efforts to tailor free speech all over the place? Are you going to make an argument tyere has EVER been a US admin that didn't try to do this?
tombert•1h ago
Fucking Christ.

I still don’t understand how anyone heard Trump bragging about how he’s going to “open up those libel laws”, in addition to all the other idiotic shit that he said, and still decided to vote for him.

I am sure people had their reasons, and maybe some of them even weren’t racist, but I am still having trouble comprehending how anyone didn’t see all this shit coming.

https://www.politico.com/blogs/on-media/2016/02/donald-trump...

bathtub365•1h ago
They rightly assumed the laws wouldn’t be used against them by this admin
foogazi•1h ago
They can’t take your license away if you don’t have one