@indutny explains their views in that thread.
On the other hand, I haven’t and I believe many of us, have never paid node any money so it feels weird to dictate their approach.
Such a PR should be rejected simply because of the shear size of it, regardless of AI use. Seriously, who submits a 19k line PR? Just make many small ones.
Also, no mention at all regarding the test coverage, or impact if any on existing code paths specifically.
I suggest EVERYONE in this thread go read the the GitHub PR in question. There's some good arguments for and against AI, and what it means for FOSS... But good lord you will have to sift through the virtue signalling bullshit and have patience for the constant moving of goalposts
ramesh31•41m ago
Stop treating this like it's going to go away. We need actual solutions for the FOSS community that make reviewing AI assisted work tractable.