frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Open in hackernews

Is it a pint?

https://isitapint.com/
91•cainxinth•1h ago

Comments

jjgreen•1h ago
In Yorkshire a short pint will result in "Could you fit a whiskey in there?", "yes of course", "THEN FILL IT WITH BEER"
calebelac•1h ago
I'm going to start using this approach. Cheers!
bombcar•1h ago
In the EU I noticed lots of glasses had markings on the side - if it was full to the line, it was a pint (or liter or whatever).

McDonalds cups have a line for ice.

RGamma•1h ago
Measuring beer is serious business in Germany to the point the EU commission had to comment on a rule change that supposedly forbade the usage of steins for foaming drinks (it didn't, but Germany wanted to be extra strict): https://www.bayern3.de/bier-steinkrug-eu-richtlinie

https://germany.representation.ec.europa.eu/news/klarstellun...

Symbiote•1h ago
At least in the UK it's a legal requirement to use marked glassware when serving beer, cider and wine. (Or to use a marked measuring cylinder and pour that into the drinkware, which is sometimes done for wine.)

It's also the law in at least some EU countries, although I haven't checked beyond Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fill_line

BoxOfRain•33m ago
In true British fashion the requirements for draught beer and cider are in pints, while wine is sold in millilitres.
luplex•1h ago
and crucially, foam has to be above the line.

There is some back and forth around whether it's legal to serve beer in traditional ceramic steins, where customers can not verify that the foam really starts above the line.

As I understand, it is legal in Germany, but only if there is visible signage that informs customers about their right to pour their beer into a marked standard glass to check the amount. Source (German): https://www.abendblatt.de/incoming/article402102835/wer-hat-...

In 1899, an association was formed in Munich to combat fraudulent pouring. It was banned by the Nazis and re-formed in 1970. They went around and measured beers. This post is its spiritual successor. German: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verein_gegen_betr%C3%BCgerisch...

tveita•1h ago
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fill_line

Selling drinks in mislabeled containers should warrant a fraud report to your local consumer protection agency. A crowdsourcing app seems like the wrong tool here.

bombcar•52m ago
The US is a different place; though I will say that in Europe everything seemed to be right on the line, whereas in the US I'd say that most pours were to the very brim (likely giving me more than advertised).
jghn•1h ago
In the US at least it's pretty common to see bars using cheater pints. They look like 16 oz pint glasses but with a few tricks wind up only holding 14 oz
Waterluvian•1h ago
In Canada (and I’m sure elsewhere) there are surprise inspections where government inspectors show up at petrol stations and see if the pump actually gives you what it claims.

I volunteer for the pub equivalent of this.

9rx•1h ago
You're in luck. Measurement Canada has the authority to inspect pints. Typically they only act on complaints, though.

https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/measurement-canada/en/buyin...

ryandrake•1h ago
I have a feeling that if the USA did random, surprise inspections on businesses to make sure what they were selling was actually as-advertised, the whole system would be exposed as fraud within a month.
lucideer•1h ago
I don't know if other companies do this anywhere but if you live in Ireland. Diageo have roles for people to travel around the country doing precisely this.
arkensaw•1h ago
ah yes, the guinness vans, I do often see them out and about
bluGill•1h ago
In the US every gas pump I've seen (I have not check the majority of states, but still a good sample) has a sticker on it stating inspections and who runs the state department that inspects them. Usually it is a yearly inspection (at least according to the sticker, maybe they do it more often I don't know)
skeptrune•1h ago
Most useful website I've been on in a hot minute
badgersnake•1h ago
We’ve had laws requiring landlords to serve standardised pints the UK since 1698. This is not a new problem.
xnorswap•1h ago
1985 is the current one: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1985/72/contents

It's why all bars will have a little plaque saying what size their shots are. Almost always 25ml these days, but 35ml was common in many places. You're allowed to serve shots of either size but not in the same pub.

( edit: Better link: https://www.gov.uk/weights-measures-and-packaging-the-law/sp... )

maxbaines•1h ago
Great minds...
graemep•52m ago
I did not know about the 35ml is OK too but not both on the same premises rule.
tialaramex•45m ago
The way they got to the 25/ 35 split involves even more craziness. In England the law said spirits are always measured in sixths of a gill. This entire unit is obsolete, but 1/6 is a tiny bit less than 25ml. Fine.

However in Scotland two sizes were common, a fifth of a gill (slightly more generous than England) and a "nip" or quarter of a gill (a lot more generous). If you're used to ordering a "nip" of something and now you get a lot less you'd be very angry! So the 35ml option is there for the kind of Scottish or Irish establishment which would have been used to these larger measures rather than either try to keep the gill (which is a stupid unit nobody else needs) or anger drunk people.

I wouldn't be surprised if the "Make a sign" difference was to allow licensed premises to gradually shift to the more profitable, smaller, size. Maybe you change the place you own in Glasgow to 25ml first, and if the locals don't kick off you can try Aberdeen next, otherwise try again in a few years.

maxbaines•1h ago
Agree this is a fact - we mark our glasses because of it. https://www.gov.uk/weights-measures-and-packaging-the-law/pr...
philipwhiuk•1h ago
I like the CAMRA ones which have the pint line below the rim of the glass. Because technically the head doesn't count as part of the pint and there's a lot of back-and-forth about what the legally acceptable amount of head really is (CAMRA say 0%, pub associations serve 5%, pubs themselves serve whatever they think you'll pay for).
gib444•29m ago
And they say England becoming low-trust is a recent change !
xnorswap•1h ago
I got poured a pint by a newbie behind the bar at a hotel recently and she looked embarrassed as it was about 40% head, but to her credit she went to fetch the shift supervisor before I said anything.

He explained after pouring it better that, even the remaining head (It had ~3/4 inch even after fixing it) might still be met by derision by many customers. "They'd be asking if you would be charging them for just for the half" etc.

There's a bit of leeway but you'll quickly hear about it if you short a pint too much.

post-it•1h ago
I'm not sure I understand, why didn't she just top it up?
dismalaf•1h ago
Right? Just top it up, let some of the foam cascade over the side... Foam always forms in the keg if it sits for too long so you need to let some of it out anyway.
xnorswap•1h ago
Who knows, she obviously lacked experience, I guess she just panicked or worried it might be an issue with the barrel rather than her pour?
vojtapol•1h ago
Yes. Americans/Canadians famously can't pour beer properly. If you are pouring a pilsner or really any lager, a head of at least 2 inches is actually correct and absolutely desirable. The way it's poured in Canada (no head) is borderline undrinkable to me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dggKezrSQxI

masfuerte•1h ago
If an establishment wants to serve drinks with a head they should use glasses with a mark on the side indicating the measure, rather than glasses which need to be brim full. Using the latter style of glass and including a head is just ripping off the customer.
consp•1h ago
We call that kind of beer without any head "dead". Measurement here is about two fingers width, and if you do it the first time and screw up it is two fingers in length (second part is of course tounge-in-cheek).
skipants•50m ago
As a Canadian: hard agree. Beer without head is gross.
mb7733•31m ago
Preferences vary on both sides of the Atlantic. Another comment on this post complains that Americans pour beer wrong because they _do_ pour with a head.

> Also in the US (probably due to lack of training and the customer too embarrassed to complaining) tend not to fill it the brim (and so not even 16''). I've seen 2-3 inch heads and asked them to top it up. They look at me as if I've just insulted George Washington

secondcoming•26m ago
If I get a beer with no head I'm assuming the glass was dirty
steveharing1•1h ago
Unique idea!
wodenokoto•1h ago
> 79.3% of pours were short (under 100% of claimed volume)

That is quite surprising. What breweries used to do when I worked in cafes and bars was to paint a mark on the glass and under it write "0.5" (in market that sells in liters and not in pints) and this mark is above[1] the half liter mark. Note that it is without units.

Pubs and bars get glasses for cheap or free and the brewery/distributor tries to trick the bar into selling more beer than they expect.

[1] We checked using measure cups from the kitchen. Maybe there is a conspiracy to have kitchens use too little ingredients.

ch_123•1h ago
In the UK and Ireland, a pint is 20 oz. (equivalent to just over 19 US ounces), so I always feel cheated by 16 oz. "pint" glasses in the US.
dghf•1h ago
This is why I get agitated when Americans claim to use imperial units. If they did, their pints would be the correct size.
cjs_ac•1h ago
Americans don't claim to use imperial weights and measures; they use customary weights and measures, which were also used in the UK prior to the creation of imperial units with the Weights and Measures Act 1824.
kube-system•57m ago
There are many people in America who do not know the difference, the mistake is fairly common.
alnwlsn•26m ago
The (incorrect) claim is indeed made in every single metric vs "imperial" comments section I've come across.
bryanrasmussen•1h ago
surely if that was the claim George Washington would never have had his dream

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JYqfVE-fykk

loeg•1h ago
It's not completely uncommon to be offered 16 oz or 20 oz as options in the US. But I see it more at "fast casual" restaurants than bars or more upscale restaurants.
cbm-vic-20•33m ago
And of course, what an "ounce" means may vary. According to Wikipedia "An imperial fluid ounce is defined in British law as exactly 28.4130625 millilitres, while a US customary fluid ounce is exactly 29.5735295625 mL, and a US food labelling fluid ounce is 30 mL."
vlod•1h ago
Also in the US (probably due to lack of training and the customer too embarrassed to complaining) tend not to fill it the brim (and so not even 16''). I've seen 2-3 inch heads and asked them to top it up. They look at me as if I've just insulted George Washington.
mcjiggerlog•1h ago
Well, depending on the type of beer, that's intentional. It's not always the faux-pas that it would be to do this when serving cask ale in the UK.
bardak•56m ago
But usually when that is the case they will use glassware that has a 20oz line on the glass with room for the head.
consp•1h ago
A pint in the Netherlands usually is 500ml. In very rare cases, but only in real pubs (not mass market "Irish" pubs) you get an actual pint. So you are cheated out of about ~68ml in that case. Vs the US you get a few ml more.
ch_123•56m ago
A standard US pint is about 473ml so a US pint is ~95ml less than an imperial pint.
thrance•27m ago
Same thing here in France. Except I've never seen any "real" pints here, it's always 50cl.
amiga386•25m ago
As far as I knew, Netherlands pubs typically sold:

- 200ml "fluitje" (little flute)

- 250ml "pintje" (little pint), often sold in a "vaasje" (vase, a tapered beer glass). This is the typical beer measure: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pintje "Het bestelde glas pils heeft doorgaans een inhoud van 25 cl"

They also sell standard bottled beer in 300ml and standard cans in 330ml: https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standaardglas

I was not aware that 500ml was usual for the Netherlands. It is usual in, say, Germany, where they also sell the 1 litre Maß

jcul•7m ago
Do they actually call it a pint or just a half litre / large beer?

That's seems to be the norm in a lot of mainland Europe.

eduction•41m ago
Your pubs kindly return the favor when we order whiskey. As Hunter S Thompson is reported to have quipped in a bar your side of the Atlantic: "What is this, a sample?"
BoxOfRain•35m ago
That's fair, can't argue with that one.

Personally I'd have us use what the Royal Navy used to serve its rum ration in, the half-gill. This is 1/8 of a British pint or 71 millilitres, and the rum would have been a minimum of 54%!

Fractional gills were the pre-metric shot measure in the UK, but they were still pretty stingy. 1/6 gill in England, 1/5 or 1/4 gill in Scotland, and 1/4 gill in Northern Ireland.

dfawcus•40m ago
The volume of UK and US fluid ounces being different also doesn't help.

The UK pint is 568ml, apparently a US pint is 473 ml.

lbourdages•21m ago
It is the same in Canada [1] yet I frequently see beer sold in "US pints" over here. I assume they do it so they can advertise cheaper prices (the amount being smaller). Some places will write the glass size in ounces, but some won't.

It is one of my pet peeves for sure.

[1]: https://ised-isde.canada.ca/site/measurement-canada/en/buyin...

lucideer•1h ago
I'm from Ireland, where filling beers precisely up to the brim is practically a religion, & many barmen will even take the glass back & top it up if they see the head diminishing too quickly in the space of time it takes you to pick the freshly poured pint up.

One thing that always struck me as odd is how the culture is seemingly the opposite of this in apparent beer meccas like Belgium - not only are the glasses typically much smaller (this is fine) but they also leave massive gaps at the top. The glass capacity is never treated as being close to the rim at all.

petesergeant•1h ago
The only sensible approach here is pint-to-line glasses. I don't want my glass filled to the very top where I'll spill it, I want it filled to the pint line. Sadly in the UK up to 5% of the pint is allowed to be foam, but I'd expect any sensible barman in the UK to top me up to the pint line if I asked, and be apologetic about it.
philipwhiuk•1h ago
Kind of.

Guinness glasses are exactly a pint, so the Guinness head means you're getting less than a pint of actual beer.

This is tolerated/expected and so de facto correct but de jure perhaps not.

dismalaf•1h ago
In Czech Republic they usually pour 3 fingers of head. But the measure line is also part way down the glass, the foam all above the line...
ahofmann•56m ago
I remember watching the cornetto trilogy ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Three_Flavours_Cornetto ) and always wondering why on earth they fill up the glasses up to the brim. It is uncomfortable to transport this way and not spill beer.
OJFord•48m ago
First sip's at the bar; then you can
fanf2•41m ago
When CAMRA was new in the early 1970s, they started a campaign for oversize glasses holding a pint to the line instead of a pint to the rim, so that there would be space for a pint of liquid and a head in the glass. The big breweries hated this idea and mounted a reactionary campaign arguing things like it would be too expensive to replace all the glasses, or serve customers the full measure they had paid for. (My father was a new recruit at Guinness and sadly one of his early tasks was the pint-to-brim campaign.)
pmh•54m ago
> not only are the glasses typically much smaller (this is fine) but they also leave massive gaps at the top

I'm wondering if this is due to the prevalence of cask ales vs bottle/keg conditioning. The former is relatively uncommon in Belgium and you want the head from the latter.

That said, oversized glassware (e.g. Duvel's tulip for aromatics) and/or fill lines are also used to accommodate the head while still not cheating the customer out of volume.

amonon•49m ago
My understanding is Belgian beer culture considers the aroma to be an important part of the experience. But I’ve never been, that’s all through osmosis.
calebelac•1h ago
Thanks for sharing! Glad to see there's some momentum behind this libatious tragedy
TheGRS•1h ago
I'll happily volunteer for this. I may have found my new purpose in life!
BashiBazouk•1h ago
Reminds me of backpacking up and down the east coast of Australia. I learned that Fosters is only northern New South Wales for beer. Every place had their own preferred beer, but maddeningly they all had their own glass. A tenner, a schooner. Each a slightly different size. I made friends with a guy in Hobart that was staying in the hostel as he was doing research there, I think he was a biologist. He took me to his favorite pub as they served imperial pints. I think who ever is behind this site needs to do some serious research in Australia as they could, at least, double the "know your glass" section...
mcbain•32m ago
You might enjoy the matrix of regional sizes and names on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_in_Australia#Beer_glasses

No, us locals don't know them all either!

amonon•1h ago
Look, I get it. Beer is expensive, these days. Always has been. But I feel like these movements miss the forest for trees.

If we mandate beer volume then places that are “shorting” you will just raise the prices. Not to mention the tax on beer that would be required to pay for the inspection service. No one likes feeling like they got less than they paid for, but there’s solution is to take your business elsewhere.

Also, you know what really annoys me? When a bartender pulls a pint for me, and it’s up to the brim with no foam. Foam is part of the joy of a crisp beer. It adds aroma and anticipation. If I wanted to drink something with no foam I’d drink a soda. And in my heart of hearts (or stomach if stomachs?) I fear that’s where these arguments lead.

roxolotl•59m ago
The solution is in other comments. In the EU glasses are etched with a fill line. Not filled to the mark? You complain.
amonon•37m ago
That seems very reasonable to me.
graemep•53m ago
> No one likes feeling like they got less than they paid for, but there’s solution is to take your business elsewhere.

People need to know how much they got. it can be hard to judge, especially as you will be comparing across visits to different places on different days, and different styles of glass, etc.

Johnny555•53m ago
No one likes feeling like they got less than they paid for, but without regulation, how do you know that you got less than you paid for unless you're going to carry around a measuring glass yourself?

If the places that were shorting you have to raise prices when they have to give you what you paid for, that's false economy -- you're not saving money, if you want to drink less beer to save money, ask for a smaller glass.

amonon•37m ago
I guess I feel the same way about that as I do about a steak. How do I know that the steak is the 16oz I ordered? Ultimately the most important part is if I found the experience satisfying enough to return, not whether the steak was within .5oz of its stated measurement.
Spivak•47m ago
I think your expected outcome is actually the desired one, to kill shrinkflation in favor of actual price increases. When the measures are all the same you can compare apples to apples across different businesses.
d--b•48m ago
As infuriating as it may be, it's a good occasion to learn to let go.

Rationally, you're paying way more than the liquid in the glass, so just mentally tell yourself that the haircut is included in the price, and that's fine. If you can't stand the price anyway, change bar.

You're there to chill. Just chill.

goosejuice•22m ago
I'm sure the same individuals will calculate tip to the cent as well.

As someone who worked in specialty foods for years, you get what you get. Flaws and all. That's part of the charm of this industry. This is especially true for small craft breweries. If you insist on accuracy then ask for a can/bottle list. If you insist on consistency then buy macro.

twodave•46m ago
Now this is what the Internet is really supposed to be about.
oldandboring•38m ago
I enjoyed reading this site and appreciate the passion and the effort.

The "loss of the pint" is basically shrink-flation. When a bar's costs and/or overhead goes up, they must do some combination of cutting expenses and raising prices. Raising prices means either selling the same stuff in the same quantity for more, or selling cheaper stuff OR less of the same stuff at the same price. Most bars will opt for the latter options to avoid raising prices, because raising prices is more likely to create complaints. All caveats apply, of course -- drop portions or quality too much or too often and you'll get complaints for sure, but "within reason" it's the lesser of two evils.

This is why I personally don't feel like I'm being cheated out of 2oz when I buy a $8 14oz shaker pint of IPA. Clearly, the cost per oz at this bar is $0.57. A 16oz glass would cost $9.14. They don't owe me the 2oz for free just because they used the word "pint". If the state government started enforcing pint measures again, bars would just drop the word "pint" from their signs and menus.

Forgeties79•16m ago
It’s such a small thing but when a brewery or restaurant featuring beers writes “pint” as an option and gives me a typical US beer glass (shaker I believe) it annoys the hell out of me. Don’t explicitly write “pint” if it isn’t at least north of 15oz. Definitely don’t if the glass literally can’t hold a pint.
goosejuice•10m ago
Wait until they discover cocktails.

Bickering over a few dollars when you're paying a premium price for the experience of going out is rather silly. There's better uses of your time, like enjoying yourself.

If you're not familiar with the mess that was nips: https://carolinas.eater.com/2015/10/16/9553903/mini-bottles-...

Tom Scott is Returning to YouTube [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yz3lSKgz4q8
1•learnedbytes•52s ago•0 comments

Show HN: JulIDE – Lightweight Julia IDE Built with Tauri

https://github.com/sinisterMage/JulIde
1•SinisterMage2•1m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Minimalist library to generate SVG views of scientific data

https://github.com/alefore/mini_svg/
1•afc•1m ago•0 comments

Denmark desperately needs more inequality

https://world.hey.com/dhh/denmark-desperately-needs-more-inequality-8e84a8d0
1•mosura•2m ago•0 comments

Rethinking Superdeterminism (2019)

https://arxiv.org/abs/1912.06462
1•johnbarron•2m ago•0 comments

Large Language Muddle

https://www.nplusonemag.com/issue-51/the-intellectual-situation/large-language-muddle/
1•kreyenborgi•2m ago•0 comments

Stop naming buildings (and streets, and parks, and mountains) after people

https://fritinancy.substack.com/p/stop-naming-buildings-and-streets
1•colinprince•2m ago•0 comments

Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMs

https://www.alphaxiv.org/abs/2602.16800
1•bongoman42•3m ago•0 comments

Sennheiser's headphone division seeks a new owner

https://www.heise.de/en/news/Sennheiser-s-headphone-division-seeks-a-new-owner-11221310.html
1•bj-rn•3m ago•0 comments

LeetCode Optimization and Go

https://xnacly.me/posts/2023/leetcode-optimization/
1•ibobev•5m ago•0 comments

Obituary for the greatest monument to logical AGI

https://yuxi.ml/cyc
1•e-dant•6m ago•0 comments

How to Write Fast Game Engine Math

https://gamesbymason.com/blog/2026/math/
1•ibobev•6m ago•0 comments

US Labor Force Demographics Are Worsening

https://www.aei.org/domestic-policy/our-labor-force-demographics-are-getting-worse/
1•toomuchtodo•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tok/s on a 35B MoE model using a $100 AMD crypto APU and Vulkan

https://github.com/akandr/bc250
1•akandr•7m ago•1 comments

Runway GWM-1

https://runwayml.com/research/introducing-runway-gwm-1
1•lastdong•7m ago•1 comments

My prodigal brainchild: Neal Stephenson on the Metaverse

https://nealstephenson.substack.com/p/my-prodigal-brainchild
1•robinhouston•8m ago•0 comments

Schema as the Core of Reliability in AI Memory

https://xmemory.ai/schema-as-the-core-of-reliability/
1•ashvardanian•8m ago•0 comments

$100 gift card could be legit. $1000 is a Scam. What should scammers do?

https://blog.computationalcomplexity.org/2026/03/a-100-dollar-gift-care-could-be-legit.html
1•speckx•8m ago•0 comments

Mapping ICE's expanding footprint, and the communities fighting back

https://www.npr.org/2026/03/23/g-s1-114107/ices-growing-detention-footprint-and-the-communities-f...
1•verdverm•8m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Daily Unfold – A paper folding puzzle game

https://www.dailyunfold.com/
2•astralasia•8m ago•0 comments

Fantasy Baseball 2026

https://arnoldkling.substack.com/p/fantasy-baseball-2026
1•paulpauper•8m ago•0 comments

Dark Shadows Fall, One Upon the Other

https://www.robkhenderson.com/p/dark-shadows-fall-one-upon-the-other
1•paulpauper•9m ago•0 comments

A Conversation with Claude

https://www.noahpinion.blog/p/a-conversation-with-claude
2•paulpauper•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Run Labs – A multi-product startup

https://run-labs.com/
2•mnewme•10m ago•0 comments

The Priesthood of System Design

https://pooyam.dev/llms-system-design
1•py4•10m ago•0 comments

Outworked – An Open Source Office UI for Claude Code Agents

https://github.com/outworked/outworked
2•ZeidJ•12m ago•1 comments

Trigrep – indexed regex search in Rust with CLI

https://github.com/PythonicNinja/trigrep
1•PythonicNinja•13m ago•2 comments

Harper's Policy on PRs Authored by Agents

https://elijahpotter.dev/articles/harper%27s-policy-on-agent-PRs
1•chilipepperhott•14m ago•0 comments

Show HN: SRD, a simple DNS-driven HTTP redirect service

https://github.com/twopow/srd
1•patabyte•14m ago•0 comments

Coke fires worker injured on the job, keeping him would be hard on the company

https://www.cbc.ca/news/gopublic/go-public-coke-coca-cola-factory-injury-wcb-frustrated-empoloyem...
2•geox•17m ago•0 comments