frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Launching AccessPatch on Product Hunt today – would love your support

https://www.indiehackers.com/post/launching-accesspatch-on-product-hunt-today-would-love-your-sup...
1•izajahmad•42s ago•0 comments

The Last Contract: William T. Vollmann's Battle to Publish an Epic (2025)

https://www.metropolitanreview.org/p/the-last-contract
1•benbreen•46s ago•0 comments

As parents age, their children face hard choices about when to take the car keys

https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5729024
1•mooreds•50s ago•0 comments

A Decade of Eventide: Evolving an Event-Sourced Architecture and Ecosystem

https://blog.eventide-project.org/articles/a-decade-of-eventide/
1•sbellware•2m ago•1 comments

Playable CSS-Only Super Mario Bros Game

https://codepen.io/t_afif/full/JoKYwXO
1•bookofjoe•2m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built the first AI agentic fitness coaching app

https://www.mytrainerapp.io/en
1•ggay•2m ago•0 comments

HyperAgents

https://github.com/facebookresearch/hyperagents
1•andyg_blog•3m ago•1 comments

New supercool alloy could take the heat off helium-3

https://newatlas.com/materials/rare-earth-cooling-alloy-helium-3/
1•wjSgoWPm5bWAhXB•3m ago•0 comments

Enterprise Email Classification Using Instruction-Following LLMs

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/16/5/2173
1•PaulHoule•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I pointed my CVE pipeline at 1,500 GitLab servers. It found 31 vulns

https://attackerview.com/blog/i-pointed-my-cve-pipeline-at-1-500-gitlab-servers-it-found-31-explo...
1•valeriobaudo•5m ago•0 comments

Still early, would love feedback from folks doing outbound or sales

1•gauravvppnd•5m ago•0 comments

How we (accidentally) rebuilt our incident response workflow using agents

https://gadget.dev/blog/how-we-accidentally-rebuilt-our-incident-response-workflow
1•draward•5m ago•0 comments

Meta's Virtual Reality App Ditching VR to Make a Roblox Clone

https://kotaku.com/metas-virtual-reality-app-ditching-vr-to-make-a-roblox-clone-2000671434
1•PaulHoule•5m ago•0 comments

Jupiter's lightning is 100 times stronger than Earth's bolts

https://www.popsci.com/science/jupiter-lightning-stronger-earth/
1•Brajeshwar•5m ago•0 comments

Show HN: HiredToday.app – AI resume tailoring, cover letters and interview prep

https://www.hiredtoday.app
1•masterofmyself•5m ago•0 comments

Slopification and Its Discontents

https://charlesleifer.com/blog/slopification-and-its-discontents/
1•synparb•6m ago•0 comments

The End of Coding: Andrej Karpathy on Agents, AutoResearch, and Loopy Era of AI [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kwSVtQ7dziU
1•rzk•7m ago•0 comments

We Built a Claude Agent That Doesn't Know Its Own API Keys

https://listenlabs.ai/blog/we-lied-to-our-claude-code-agent
7•oelmgren•9m ago•1 comments

Wealth, Shown to Scale

https://wealth.ronnycoste.com/
3•Cider9986•10m ago•0 comments

FBI says Iranian hackers are using Telegram to steal data in malware attacks

https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/23/fbi-says-iranian-hackers-are-using-telegram-to-steal-data-in-ma...
3•steveharing1•14m ago•0 comments

Galdr – open-source audio perception framework; what LLMs find in music

https://github.com/sellemain/galdr/blob/main/docs/bohemian-rhapsody.md
1•Sellemain•14m ago•0 comments

Defense in Depth: A Practical Guide to Python Supply Chain Security

https://bernat.tech/posts/securing-python-supply-chain/
1•vinhnx•15m ago•0 comments

The Anarchist Cookbook – Why It Was Suppressed and Why It Still Won't Die

https://markoneill.org/anarchist-cookbook-why-suppressed/
2•laurex•15m ago•0 comments

Does it make sense to ask Blackberry to re-license ancient QNX sources?

2•ymz5•16m ago•0 comments

The Silly Apps Graveyard

https://ironicsans.ghost.io/silly-apps-graveyard/
2•caminanteblanco•16m ago•0 comments

The WWI biplane era of enterprise AI

https://cruftbox.com/2026/03/23/the-wwi-biplane-era-of-enterprise-ai/
1•cruftbox•16m ago•0 comments

We Scaled Kimi K2.5 – Zhilin Yang's Full GTC 2026 Keynote [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CwePo4847ho
1•Topfi•16m ago•0 comments

Harness design for long-running application development

https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/harness-design-long-running-apps
1•yusufozkan•17m ago•1 comments

MCP Stories from the Field

https://sourcegraph.com/blog/mcp-stories-from-the-field
1•imnot404•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Prism MCP v4.0 – Behavioral Memory for AI Agents

https://github.com/dcostenco/prism-mcp
1•dcostenco•17m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

LaGuardia pilots raised safety alarms months before deadly runway crash

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/mar/24/laguardia-airplane-pilots-safety-concerns-crash
128•m_fayer•1h ago

Comments

notRobot•1h ago
There was a single traffic controller handling the entire airport. This was bound to happen and will keep happening unless things change. It's absurd that the US hasn't been able to fix its ATC shortage in like decades.

Currently over 41% of facilities are reliant on mandatory overtime, with controllers frequently working 60-hour weeks with only four days off per month.

FL410•1h ago
This. Go look at the atc subreddit, controllers have been begging for help for ages. This isn't one guy's fault.
adgjlsfhk1•1h ago
>This isn't one guy's fault.

Counterpoint. It's Regen's fault. He's the guy who decided that a high priority of the government was making sure air traffic controllers had no power to fight back against being horrifically overworked (because unions are evil you see)

voxic11•58m ago
Wasn't it Congress who passed 5 U.S.C. § 7311. which says a person may not “accept or hold” a federal job if they “participate in a strike” against the U.S. government.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/7311

originally passed as

https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?edition=2023&num=0&req=g...

So arguably if Reagan had not fired them he would be failing to uphold the laws of the United States.

busterarm•57m ago
The issue is the shortage, which that doesn't address. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Was in three different unions. Union didn't do squat for me. Mainly kept my wages down and gave the friends of the union rep the best shifts.

anonymars•7m ago
Firing them all broke the pipeline

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495739

jen20•57m ago
There have been six presidents who could have addressed this since Reagan. Every one of them shoulders some of the responsibility.
_ph_•51m ago
Yes, they should all have taken actions. But also, it is much more difficult to fix something broken once the damage has settled in. I guess none of them was willing to risk the disruption a fix would have caused. And the system seemed to have held up for quite a while. Weren't there some mass firings of ATC personal at the beginning of the Trump presidency?

The bottom line is: don't break things that are difficult or impossible to fix.

jen20•25m ago
The is a good idea, but once they are broken, you should at least try to fix them, or bear some of the blame for not having tried.
jordanb•40m ago
One thing people forget is that the key complaints PATCO's members had were:

  1. outdated equipment
  2. staffing levels
  3. workload and fatigue
Reagan went to war with the union instead of addressing these things.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Professional_Air_Traffic_...

coryrc•33m ago
You don't need a union to have effective management. It should also be their incentive not to cause people's death by overworking employees. Which is also dumb because it costs more to overwork then hire appropriately with overtime laws... cops exploit this all the time to steal money from taxpayers. (The ones in Seattle only get caught when they accidently charge over 24 hours of overtime in a day)

Union rules that say only a particular classification of employee is allowed to pick up a small package from a loading dock and move it twenty feet are also bad.

The blame can go to the top, for not managing correctly.

2c0m•1h ago
I actually looked into becoming an ATC controller a year or two ago (I love aviation) and they had an age cap of ~30 to start training. I'm 32, so ruled out.
irishcoffee•43m ago
31. If you had started 2 years ago you should have been fine.
MisterTea•1h ago
When I heard about the crash I immediately recalled the recent articles about ATC shortages and overworked ATC's. And here we are. ONE dude running ATC for LaGuardia. Mind boggling.

I place no blame on the ATC as they were doing everything they could given the shit sandwich they were handed. I see this happening all over with staffs getting pared down to minimums, more (sometimes unpaid) over time, prices going up, and no raises.

m_fayer•57m ago
I’m not trying to minimize a tragedy, but maybe this is almost the perfect wake up call?

Not many fatalities but nevertheless a spectacular collision. At a major hub airport in a major city. It’s hard to look away from, the cause is obvious, and all that without hundreds of deaths.

amiga386•7m ago
Agreed. There are a whole bucketload of problems, each one contributing to the staff shortage. The US has problems that other countries don't have (or have less of). It's a long-term organisational issue. None of it is insurmountable, but things need to be done differently, and the politics of that may be insurmountable.

Being an air-traffic controller anywhere in the world is a very intense job at times, and needs a huge amount of proficiency that only a small number of people are capable of doing. Couple that with:

- the FAA expects you to move to where ATCs are needed, so many of the qualified applicants give up when they hear where the posting is. You can't force them to take the job!

- the technology is decades out of date and the Brand New Air Traffic Control System (it's seriously called that) won't roll out until 2028 at the earliest

- Obama's FAA disincentivised its traditional "feeder" colleges that do ATC courses to "promote diversity", net outcome was fewer applicants

- Regan broke the union in the 1980s

- DOGE indiscriminately decimated the FAA like it did most other government departments

itopaloglu83•1h ago
Setting people up for failure and then using them as scapegoats, this simply infuriates me.

Expecting a single person to consistently keep their mental picture clear and perfect for their entire career is asinine and irresponsible.

We need systems and tools to eliminate such errors and support people, not use them as a person to blame when things inevitably go wrong.

mikpanko•1h ago
According to NYT it seems like there were 2 controllers and “2 more in the building”. They also wrote that 2 seems normal for the late slower time of the night.

Not saying this is the right number of controllers to have, just sharing what I read in NYT.

amelius•1h ago
I'm going to make myself unpopular and ask if an AI could have prevented this accident.
blitzar•1h ago
You are absolulety right, the blockchain could have prevented this accident
dehrmann•1h ago
You don't need modern AI; you can build a system that does voice recognition, models the airport and airspace, and applies looks for violations.

Actually, you might be able to try this. Live ATC and radar is available.

kevmo•29m ago
The US intentionally created the ATC shortage. From Wikipedia:

The PATCO Strike of 1981 was a union-organized work stoppage by air traffic controllers (ATCs) in the United States. The Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization (PATCO) declared a strike on August 3, 1981, after years of tension between controllers and the federal government over long hours, chronic understaffing, outdated equipment, and rising workplace stress. Despite 13,000 ATCs striking, the strike ultimately failed, as the Reagan administration was able to replace the striking ATCs, resulting in PATCO's decertification.

The failure of the PATCO strike impacted the American labor movement, accelerating the decline in labor unions in the country, and initiating a much more aggressive anti-union policy by the federal government and private sector employers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1981_Professional_Air_Traffic_...

arjie•1h ago
> According to the aviation safety reporting system administered by the US space agency Nasa...

Aeronautics, yes, but I was still surprised to see NASA and not the FAA here. But folllowing up here https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/overview/immunity.html

> The FAA determined that ASRP effectiveness would be greatly enhanced if NASA, rather than the FAA, accomplished the receipt, processing, and analysis of raw data. This would ensure the anonymity of the reporter and of all parties involved in a reported occurrence or incident and, consequently, increase the flow of information necessary for the effective evaluation of the safety and efficiency of the NAS.

Very neat. It's by design. Well done.

0xffff2•26m ago
I work in exactly this space as a NASA contractor. I don't actually have a massive amount of insight into the FAA, but my impression is that they don't do much in the way of R&D on their own. I think (without hard numbers mind you) the vast majority of FAA R&D work starts at NASA or other government labs and gets transferred to the FAA when it gets to a sufficient level of maturity. In that context, it's even more natural for NASA to host the ASRS system.
ndiddy•1h ago
I just hope they don't try to pin this on the controller who was on duty and move on without putting plans in place for some sort of structural change. Controllers are forced to work 60+ hour weeks and overnight shifts, and the controller in question was working both ground and air control simultaneously due to staffing shortages. If you listen to the ATC audio, he was handling finding a spot for a plane that aborted takeoff and declared an emergency, while calling emergency services for that plane, while coordinating multiple planes coming in to land, while also coordinating multiple planes trying to take off. With that kind of workload, an accident like this is an eventuality. Even after the fatal accident happened, he had to work for at least another hour before he could get relieved of his duty. Hopefully something will happen to fix this at some point rather than us collectively deciding that an accident or two per year is worth the cost savings of not keeping ATC properly staffed.
metalliqaz•1h ago
How do you know it was due to staffing shortages? It is common at LGA for one controller to be handling Tower and Ground late at night.
FL410•1h ago
And therein lies the problem. Clearly, having one overworked controller running a combined tower is not safe nor sustainable.
pc86•15m ago
Planes landing at a rate of one every 30-40 minutes isn't exactly "overworked."
gortok•12m ago
In this case there were two arrivals within 4 minutes of each other and two departures, in addition to the emergency plane that had just aborted takeoff.
pc86•6m ago
Which is a completely reasonable amount of traffic for one controller to handle. This wasn't the controller's fault. The firetruck received a clearance, had that clearance revoked, and either didn't hear the revocation or ignored it.
VK-pro•5m ago
I don’t have time to check flight logs but I personally landed at LGA coming from MDW on Sunday. And I also know people who got diverted within the hour coming back to LGA that night. 30-40 minutes doesn’t seem accurate. That aside, if you’ve ever done operational staffing, you’d know that you should probably have at least one redundancy. When there is any chance of emergency or two events happening simultaneously, you should have more than one person.

One last meta point. We live in the wealthiest country in the history of the world, and the highest air travel prices (some part is a function of longer distances I know). We should expect that we have ample coverage, if not over-coverage, at all times for one of our major metropolitan airports. Pay them.

ryanmcbride•1h ago
Maybe there should be more than one
metalliqaz•55m ago
Maybe. Lets see what the NTSB recommendations say.

However despite the downvotes I still haven't seen evidence that they were running understaffed at that moment.

What I do know is that the developing emergency on the tarmac due to an apparently hazardous smell in another plane is likely the cause of the confusion that led to this incident. That's a trigger that could have been exacerbated by fatigue but we don't have any evidence of that yet.

RankingMember•33m ago
> I still haven't seen evidence that they were running understaffed at that moment.

I think the disagreement you see is based on the definition of what "understaffed" means. Having one ATC to do ground and air control simultaneously seems like an under-staffing situation to begin with, regardless of whether it's a common practice.

thmsths•8m ago
There is also the angle of: even if there is an appropriate amount of controllers in the tower at a given time, how they do it can also hint at the issue. Being an ATC is a taxing job, mandatory overtime and 60 hours work weeks screams understaffing to me.
murat124•13m ago
SPOF still applies here. You don't need evidence of fatigue or anything. You have only 1 of anything, you run the risk of ending up having nothing.
jen20•58m ago
> It is common at LGA for one controller to be handling Tower and Ground late at night.

What happens when they need the bathroom, or have some kind of medical problem? If it's really a common case for one controller to handle things, the system itself needs to be fundamentally rethought.

metalliqaz•54m ago
There are other people there, but the person on the radio is doing both.
cjrp•54m ago
That seems mad, given the volume of traffic they're working - even without emergencies. My local GA field is single controller, and that's VFR, grass runways, averages 40-50 movements/day.
pklausler•54m ago
"The system worked yesterday, so it should have worked forever."
jakelazaroff•53m ago
You are describing a staffing shortage.
pc86•5m ago
"Staffing shortage" doesn't mean "you can fit more people in the tower."

You can't think of any scenario having one controller makes sense?

afavour•30m ago
What you just described is a long term staffing shortage.
fyrepuffs•52m ago
Y'all can maybe think about who you are voting for in the next election -- that is if you are still able to vote.
nathanaldensr•50m ago
The FAA's problems are systemic and structural. They've existed long, long before the 2024 election.
Tyrubias•46m ago
Yes, but the problems have been driven by the relentless deregulation of critical industries and infrastructure primarily driven by a specific political bloc. In the next US election, we should vote for candidates that promise systemic change and government overhaul, not further deregulation and handouts to corporations.
jordanb•46m ago
It certainly didn't help.[1]

[1] https://www.pbs.org/newshour/show/how-doges-cutbacks-at-the-...

annexrichmond•21m ago
the headline literally says "could", not that it did. can you point to evidence that DOGE cutbacks did negatively affect aviation safety, particularly with regards to ATCs?
nobodyandproud•28m ago
Mostly due to blind faith in austerity and the market, by certain groups.
yieldcrv•47m ago
Can you elaborate on what change you would like to occur?

I have voted based on getting particular people nominated within a federal agency, requires the President to pick someone who will 100% be from their party, and a Senate committee that will confirm them

people tend to think "I'm voting against my best interests" without knowing that the agency control was my best interest as it will most likely continue shaping an industry far beyond any particular administration

I could see that happening again with your abstract, vague, and ambiguous idea. Just say what you mean specifically, use your words, so I know if it's something that could steer my vote or not

Eldt•16m ago
Very doubtful whatever agency you can conjour up as an excuse will be more impactful than the country wide changed induced by the overall administration
linkjuice4all•13m ago
You had two options and one was clearly far worse than the other. This nuanced-excuse-making and “the democrats also occasionally do things I don’t like” is lazy. Take responsibility for letting the mob take over - even if it was just by inaction.
inaros•17m ago
Hopefully some commercial professional pilots will comment on this thread, but if you go to sites where they normally hang out like:

https://www.airlinepilotforums.com

You will see many are terrified ( in commercial pilot terms...) of flying into La Guardia or JFK...

pc86•16m ago
> the controller in question was working both ground and air control simultaneously due to staffing shortages

How many planes land at LGA in the middle the night?

One controller overnight is completely reasonable.

inaros•15m ago
>> One controller overnight is completely reasonable

So if said controller has a medical episode?

pc86•10m ago
"Funny" enough if this controller had had a medical emergency (or just bad sushi) and been off the radios, this wouldn't have happened because the fire truck would not have received clearance to cross the runway and wouldn't have. Or at least would have crossed like the airport was uncontrolled, been much more careful and announced itself, and likely have seen the landing aircraft.
inaros•6m ago
An empty tower at La Guardia with a bunch of airplanes in the air not getting a reply to their calls is Die Hard 2 stuff. Spare me the Pete Hegseth school of ATC...
MeetingsBrowser•5m ago
I can’t find a way to read this other than

“If we remove regulation, things will be safer because everyone will be more careful.”

caconym_•6m ago
> One controller overnight is completely reasonable.

Do you really think it's appropriate to have zero margin for handling unusually high ATC workloads? Because we just saw what happens when you have zero margin for handling unusually high ATC workloads: people start dying.

ferguess_k•6m ago
Looking at the things he needs to juggle at the same time, is it really reasonable? Any standard we are referring here? Sure such cases are rare but that's why we have redundancies for critical positions.
bloudermilk•5m ago
Approximately one per minute in the 15 minute span proceeding this crash, including one that had an emergency takeoff rejection and was being maneuvered along with the emergency support vehicles that were being sent to attend to it
mrbukkake•58m ago
Maybe they could try using ICE agents as air traffic controllers too
annexrichmond•21m ago
Damn, this comment section is perfect example of how HN is no longer feels like HN. it's just reddit now.
antoineMoPa•6m ago
> Please don't post comments saying that HN is turning into Reddit. It's a semi-noob illusion, as old as the hills.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

fred_is_fred•20m ago
Does anyone know why the fire truck was driving across the runway in the first place? Was it a patrol, repositioning the truck, or was there an active incident that they were responding to? Seems like reducing the number of times you have to drive across an active runway is in general a good thing, but perhaps at an airport this old this is the only way to get from A to B.
nemomarx•13m ago
I believe it was responding to the other active incident that the ATC was also handling where a plane failed to take off?
fred_is_fred•8m ago
Was the 2nd plane on a runway still also?
Hovertruck•13m ago
They were responding to an incident (unidentified odor on another plane)
krisoft•9m ago
> Does anyone know why the fire truck was driving across the runway in the first place?

Yes we know. There was an other airplane who declared an emergency and was about to evacuate the passengers on the tarmac. The other plane in question had two aborted takeoffs, and then they smelled some “odour” in the aft of the plane which made some of the crew feel ill.

adolph•14m ago
It is surprising to me that airports do not use an interlock system for deconflicting the various paths segments that may be occupied by a vehicle. Trains have used mechanical ones since the 1800s [0]. The story and comments seem to indicate the only thing preventing collisions is the mind of one person--that sounds insane.

0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interlocking

eviks•10m ago
With all the advances in technology, can there be no navigation app that can just tell you you're on a collision course instead of relying exclusivly on playing broken phone between flying and driving meatbags via a sitting one?