More information at https://www.eurekalert.org/news-releases/1120166 , paper at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jacs.5c20500

> This method achieved an energy conversion efficiency of about 130%, exceeding the traditional 100% limit

I am extraordinarily confident that it did not.

> In practical terms, this means about 1.3 molybdenum-based metal complexes were activated for every photon absorbed, surpassing the conventional limit and demonstrating that more energy carriers were generated than incoming photons.

... Which is not the same thing as a >100% energy conversion efficiency (which would imply an infinite-energy-generating pump)