frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

I made a 3D Browser to review my HN upvotes [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1MiMlorMMJM
1•ppqqrr•51s ago•0 comments

Building a Powerful SIEM with ClickHouse and Clickdetect – Wazuh – SQL Detection

https://medium.com/@me_15345/building-a-powerful-siem-with-clickhouse-and-clickdetect-ae68a4495a76
1•souzo•1m ago•0 comments

How Congress Plans to Take on the Housing Crisis

https://www.wsj.com/economy/housing/how-congress-plans-to-take-on-the-housing-crisis-76bf027c
1•paulpauper•1m ago•0 comments

DuckLineage Extension for DuckDB

https://github.com/ilum-cloud/duck_lineage/
1•tanelpoder•1m ago•0 comments

Are New York's Environmental Concerns Worsening a Housing Shortage?

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/28/nyregion/hochul-housing-seqra-environment.html
1•paulpauper•2m ago•0 comments

Create Issues from Slack with Copilot

https://github.blog/changelog/2026-03-30-create-issues-from-slack-with-copilot/
1•mooreds•2m ago•0 comments

What Maxxing Reveals About Life Online

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/03/maxxing-tiktok-internet-clavicular/686616/
1•paulpauper•2m ago•0 comments

Scotty: A beautiful SSH task runner

https://freek.dev/3064-scotty-a-beautiful-ssh-task-runner
1•speckx•3m ago•0 comments

The story of Britain's oldest sweet, the Pontefract Cake (2019)

https://www.bbc.com/travel/article/20190710-the-strange-story-of-britains-oldest-sweet
1•thomassmith65•3m ago•0 comments

Claude Code has two cache bugs that can silently 10-20x your API costs

https://old.reddit.com/r/ClaudeAI/comments/1s7mkn3/psa_claude_code_has_two_cache_bugs_that_can/
1•aleph_minus_one•4m ago•0 comments

The Push to Bring DC Power to Data Centers

https://www.datacenterknowledge.com/energy-power-supply/inside-the-push-to-bring-dc-power-to-data...
1•oopsiremembered•5m ago•0 comments

The Trouble with Fusion

https://joarvarndt.se/fusion
1•joarxpablo•5m ago•0 comments

Empower Your Coding Agent with a Tailored OLAP Engine

https://modolap.com/publication/hello-world
1•ronfriedhaber•5m ago•0 comments

Paul McCartney banned from Reddit after sharing pics from his sold-out LA show

https://www.themirror.com/entertainment/music/paul-mccartney-banned-reddit-show-1765789
1•randycupertino•6m ago•0 comments

We hijacked a browser through Claude's Chrome extension

https://www.originhq.com/blog/claude-for-chrome-takeover
3•T-RN-R•6m ago•0 comments

From Hierarchy to Intelligence

https://twitter.com/jack/status/2039003879841362278
1•alan_sass•6m ago•1 comments

I Read the Leaked Claude Code Source – Here's What I Found

https://victorantos.com/posts/i-read-the-leaked-claude-code-source-heres-what-i-found/
1•miniBill•6m ago•0 comments

JA4 Fingerprinting Improves Client Identification

https://bunny.net/blog/ja4-fingerprinting-a-better-way-to-identify-clients/
1•speckx•7m ago•0 comments

ClawDesk – Agent orchestration layer on top of OpenClaw

https://github.com/glassrun/clawdesk
1•glassrun•7m ago•0 comments

JetBrains Guide Shutdown

https://www.jetbrains.com/guide/shutdown/
1•jwpapi•7m ago•0 comments

From Hierarchy to Intelligence

1•alan_sass•8m ago•1 comments

Will Everything Become an API?

https://benbrowning.me/writing/2026-will-everything-become-an-api/
1•bnbrw•8m ago•0 comments

Open Data Hubseries API

https://github.com/noi-techpark/opendatahub-timeseries-api
1•KadambariSuresh•10m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Hyprmoncfg – Terminal-based monitor config manager for Hyprland

https://paolino.me/hyprmoncfg-monitor-configuration-for-hyprland/
1•earcar•10m ago•0 comments

Time to Start Treating Dev Machines as Untrusted

https://worklifenotes.com/2026/03/31/time-to-start-treating-dev-machines-as-untrusted/
1•taleodor•11m ago•0 comments

Prerelease of Ky 2.0

https://github.com/sindresorhus/ky/releases/tag/v2.0.0-0
1•sholladay•11m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Stop your agent running Terraform destroy or Git push origin main

https://github.com/safe-agentic-world/nomos
1•prudhvinomos•11m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I built a self-hosted Fly.io engine using Go and Firecracker

https://github.com/herd-core/herd
1•sankalpnarula•12m ago•0 comments

TSMC is reportedly sold out until 2028

https://www.pcgamer.com/hardware/tsmc-is-reportedly-sold-out-until-2028-and-even-its-next-gen-ari...
1•haunter•12m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Solitaire – identity layer for AI agents, not just another memory tool

https://github.com/PRDicta/Solitaire-for-Agents
2•dictadev•13m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-individuals/termsofuse
83•lpcvoid•1h ago

Comments

Handy-Man•1h ago
Seems fine to me for the consumer facing product terms lol
jeffwask•1h ago
I can hear the lawyers huddled around a conference table rolling the bones and chanting the sacred words to come up with that "get out of trouble free" card. It told your son he had terminal cancer and should kill himself... sorry, it clearly says for Entertainment Purposes only.
Simulacra•1h ago
If it's for entertainment purposes only then why is it being shoved down our throats at every opportunity???
ranger_danger•1h ago
Mandatory Fun (TM)
sheikhnbake•1h ago
ARE YOU NOT ENTERTAINED?
boothby•15m ago
It's not for your entertainment, silly, it's for theirs.
ortusdux•1h ago
It worked for Fox News
ar0•58m ago
To be clear this is only for the standalone Copilot chat or app and website; not for the “Copilot” services integrated into Office 365 etc.
sgbeal•50m ago
> To be clear this is only for the standalone Copilot chat or app and website; not for the “Copilot” services integrated into Office 365 etc.

The section titled "WHEN & WHERE THESE TERMS APPLY" includes:

> Conversations you have with Copilot through other Microsoft apps and websites

rdsubhas•7m ago
Would be nice to know if it includes Github Copilot. I can't understand how to interpret "Copilot branded apps".
sgbeal•1m ago
It says "through other Microsoft apps and websites," i.e. they reserve the right to include or remove it when and where they like throughout their whole product line (which includes github, of course), as well as:

- Conversations you have with Copilot through third-party apps and platforms

- Other Copilot-branded apps and services that link to these Terms

That first point (#4 in their list) can cover all software, Copilot-branded or otherwise, which, even internally, uses Copilot (perhaps without your knowing so).

Github Copilot (to take your specific example) is both "other Microsoft apps and websites" and "Copile-branded". So, yeah, those ToS apply to Github Copilot.

wxw•55m ago
> Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.

> We don’t own Your Content, but we may use Your Content to operate Copilot and improve it. By using Copilot, you grant us permission to use Your Content, which means we can copy, distribute, transmit, publicly display, publicly perform, edit, translate, and reformat it, and we can give those same rights to others who work on our behalf.

lol

Junk_Collector•30m ago
This is as good as when the engineer from the Claude team said they load their website in such a way as to protect against hostile actions such as scraping.
ratelimitsteve•52m ago
i like the way that when ai does something good of course the people who built it should make a lot of money but when it does something bad no one is responsible
bradleyankrom•11m ago
Lots of that going around these days (and for many of the previous days, at least in the US)
maieuticagent•48m ago
They're just trying to pick up that Disney deal (Clippy rhymes with Mickey)
everdrive•47m ago
Lawyers are playing Calvinball again. I have no idea why the law finds this kind of argumentation compelling. "I clearly intentionally deceived, but I stashed some bullshit legalese into a document no one will read so my deception is completely OK."
torginus•42m ago
My two cents is that if it didn't, 'I didn't know that was illegal/breach of contract' would be a valid legal defense.

Although intentionally saying things that contradict whats in the contract might be legally objectionable.

marcosdumay•37m ago
When the contract is purposefully obtuse and hard to understand, that should be a valid legal defense.

When it's huge, falls upon people that can't justify a lawyer, and keeps changing all the time, one shouldn't even need to claim it. It should be automatically invalid.

voxic11•24m ago
> Copilot is for entertainment purposes only. It can make mistakes, and it may not work as intended. Don’t rely on Copilot for important advice. Use Copilot at your own risk.

Seems pretty clear to me, do you really think people need a lawyer to understand that?

lazide•16m ago
If it’s in a locked cabinet in the downstairs bathroom with the ‘out of order’ sign on the door, guarded by a leopard?
recursive•11m ago
A disused lavatory?
Sharlin•13m ago
Sure, if you make that clear in all of your marketing rather than lying your ass off and then trying the "lol we didn’t really mean it" defense.
jon-wood•8m ago
If Copilot is for entertainment purposes only then why is https://office.com all about how you can use Copilot, and closes with the small print "Copilot Chat in the Microsoft 365 Copilot app is available for Microsoft 365 Enterprise, Academic, SMB, Personal and Family subscribers with a work, education, or personal account."

Why would they include a product for entertainment purposes only in the product they sell to large companies for doing work?

throw-23•8m ago
IDK, what you understand or not seems kinda irrelevant, I think you just need a lawyer for basically anything where the other guy has brought their lawyer
crote•18m ago
On the other hand: imagine someone putting "by agreeing to this, you owe us $1,000,000,000 - unless you opt out in writing within 90 days" halfway down the 100-page EULA of some cookie-cutter smartphone app.

It is not at all uncommon for such absurd contract terms to be unenforceable - especially in B2C contracts, although it might even be tricky for B2B clickthrough ones.

The idea being that most contracts are fairly standard, so a lot of people will just skim through them. Putting a landmine in them is obviously in bad faith, so making it enforceable would basically make it impossible to do any kind of business at all.

observationist•8m ago
On the other other hand, they can put whatever they want in there, and because they've forced everything into arbitration with "third party" mediation and carved out their own little niche of the justice system, they'll never actually go to court, they'll just settle and evolve their ToS and contracts and word games accordingly.
ryandrake•5m ago
I wish we lived in more of a "spirit of the law" world than a "letter of the law" world, where everything needs to be spelled out, but we don't. A small minority of people enjoy Rules Lawyering their way through life, insisting on trying to "gotcha" counterparties who are acting in good faith, so as a consequence, we all have to be Rules Lawyers and everything needs to be spelled out.
ThrowawayR2•39m ago
"Our software developers clearly were negligent, but we stashed some bullshit legalese saying 'No warranty express or implied' into a document no one will read so our bug-infested software is completely OK."

People in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

fullshark•2m ago
Cause corporations win by stirring up whatever doubt and confusion that makes settling at a cheaper price more attractive to the other side.
monegator•47m ago
> Copilot may include advertising
sgbeal•42m ago
The section titled

> IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES & WARNINGS

Tells us:

> You may stop using Copilot at any time.

That's an odd thing to include in a ToS.

throwa356262•34m ago
I am working really hard to not start using Copilot.

And belive me, if you use any Microsoft products or services they really make it hard to avoid accidentally using the damn thing.

Including adding it to your office plan and then charging you 2x.

Junk_Collector•32m ago
Gotta love how they moved the "Create Email/meeting" buttons in Outlook mobile and stuck the Copilot button there so that you will hit it accidentally.
xnorswap•24m ago
I doubt it is odd, I suspect almost every ToS has something similar.
Mordisquitos•23m ago
I really hope so. Now I must peruse all ToS that I have agreed in the past to ensure that they have an equivalent clause. I hope I'm not contractually obliged to keep using some random website or whatever for the rest of my life.
banannaise•20m ago
104.3a A player can concede the game at any time.
monegator•13m ago
Like when i went to my github account to withdraw all copilot consents - which i never used anyway

just to be greeted with an email that welcomed me to copilot and the free plan. No button or link to disable the thing.

giancarlostoro•40m ago
How does this affect Copilot in VS 2022 / VS 2026? Because this is kind of insulting to a professional. I really wish Microsoft would learn to name things correctly. There's Copilot the ChatGPT-like service, then there's Copilot for Visual Studio which is not the same as far as I can tell.
adambb•7m ago
https://docs.github.com/en/copilot/responsible-use/chat-in-y...

They do seem to word this at a more professional level in this context (the terms linked are for individuals using Copilot in Windows, probably?)

nerdjon•39m ago
Can I get this on a sticker to pass out anyone tries to shove copilot down my throat at work?

Maybe a shirt, could sell it on the Microsoft store even. Now that would be entertainment.

yoyohello13•35m ago
I've been reading Jurassic Park recently. Hammond's monologue about expensive technology only being fundable via Entertainment seems very relevant.
Raed667•32m ago
a blanket "entertainment only" disclaimer likely wouldn't survive scrutiny for a product actively/relentlessly marketed as a productivity tool
staticautomatic•26m ago
Guys they're just disclaiming warranties relax
LurkandComment•22m ago
I thought a year ago when I bought a new laptop with 365 and Copilot integrated that they would make better use of AI and its integration. I can't think of when I actually used it and cancelled any subscription associated with it. On the otherhand, I use ChatGPT all the time.
ashleyn•8m ago
Ah yes, the new "for tobacco use only" of tech.
jrochkind1•1m ago
[delayed]