I don’t want to “defend” the FBI or anything though this essay really misses a critical point in all of its sensationalism.
> The FBI’s decades-long experiments on twins dwarf the scope of deadly Nazi studies
What the f-ing f are they saying?
No such f-all.
Everything mentioned is a PASSIVE study. They did not do anything to anyone without consent (interviews for instance.)
None if the “studies” give the impression of these outrageous claims. Even comparing the “research” to MKUltra (where that CIA scientist was given LSD without his knowledge.)
The FBI has every right to study us, merely not to “target” us without suspicion of a crime. None of these excerpts appear to do this, unless I have missed something buried among these stretched sensational claims.
uncanny2•23m ago
> The FBI’s decades-long experiments on twins dwarf the scope of deadly Nazi studies
What the f-ing f are they saying?
No such f-all.
Everything mentioned is a PASSIVE study. They did not do anything to anyone without consent (interviews for instance.)
None if the “studies” give the impression of these outrageous claims. Even comparing the “research” to MKUltra (where that CIA scientist was given LSD without his knowledge.)
The FBI has every right to study us, merely not to “target” us without suspicion of a crime. None of these excerpts appear to do this, unless I have missed something buried among these stretched sensational claims.