frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Hardening Linux Web Servers (2006)

https://freesoftwaremagazine.com/articles/hardening_linux/
1•downboots•41s ago•0 comments

Missile defense just moved to the center of the Budget

https://gonzojournalism.substack.com/p/trump-15-trillion-defense-budget
1•KariDonovan•1m ago•0 comments

Protect your Linux machines with the EDR agent we just open sourced

https://cybereason-public.github.io/owLSM/
1•SilverPlate3•4m ago•0 comments

Show HN: I made a website where any one can Play game directly on browser

1•gray_wolf_99•6m ago•0 comments

Harfbuzz 14 adds GPU rasterization support based on Slug

https://github.com/harfbuzz/harfbuzz/releases/tag/14.0.0
1•klaussilveira•6m ago•0 comments

LibreOffice Drama: TDF Removes Collabora Developers

https://itsfoss.com/news/document-foundation-collabora-feud/
1•AdmiralAsshat•6m ago•0 comments

ObjectTalk: OO Swiss Army Knife with Scripting, 2D/3D Graphics, DSP, ECS, IDE

https://github.com/goossens/ObjectTalk
1•klaussilveira•6m ago•0 comments

Chatbots are now prescribing psychiatric drugs

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/906525/ai-chatbot-prescribe-refill-psychiatri...
4•Brajeshwar•7m ago•0 comments

Search every hotel suite in the world, cash and points rates side by side

https://www.gondola.ai/suites
1•skyler1537•7m ago•1 comments

Collaborator: A Place to Create with Agents

https://github.com/collaborator-ai/collab-public
1•handfuloflight•8m ago•0 comments

Solar and batteries can power the world

https://nworbmot.org/blog/solar-battery-world.html
2•edent•9m ago•0 comments

Chinese Cigarette Museum

https://www.ciggies.app/
2•surprisetalk•9m ago•0 comments

Fix Your Gut Health Forever by Thinking About Ice Cream

https://functionoverform.substack.com/p/fix-your-gut-health-forever-by-thinking
1•surprisetalk•10m ago•0 comments

Marc Andreessen is wrong about introspection

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/marc-andreessen-is-wrong-about-introspection/
4•surprisetalk•10m ago•0 comments

OpenAI funded child safety coalition pushing for age verification

https://deep.liveblog365.com/en/index-en.html?post=233
1•TonyBorlini•12m ago•0 comments

DoorDash unveils new reusable food container pilot program called DashLoop

https://www.sfgate.com/food/article/bay-area-doordash-containers-22160491.php
2•pilingual•13m ago•0 comments

NTNT's Language-Native Background Job System

https://ntnt-lang.org/blog/introducing-language-native-job-system
1•joshcramer•13m ago•0 comments

You May Already Be Canadian

https://www.jefftk.com/p/you-may-already-be-canadian
2•pr337h4m•17m ago•0 comments

Aggro Is the Foundation (2022)

https://radimentary.wordpress.com/2022/11/07/aggro-is-the-foundation/
1•surprisetalk•18m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Ckpt – Automatic checkpoints for AI coding sessions with per-step undo

https://github.com/mohshomis/ckpt
1•mohshomis•19m ago•0 comments

Simple Self-Distillation

https://github.com/apple/ml-ssd
2•mihau•20m ago•0 comments

The Shell Is the Most Underrated Interface in AI

https://blog.nishantsoni.com/p/the-shell-is-the-most-underrated
1•sonink•20m ago•1 comments

HN: EnvGuard–VSCode extension for .env secret scanning and schema validation

https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=GayathriS.envguard-pro
1•Gayathri14•21m ago•0 comments

Retraction of high-profile reproducibility study prompts soul-searching

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-03178-8
2•paulpauper•24m ago•0 comments

What I've Been Reading

https://marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2026/04/what-ive-been-reading-285.html
2•paulpauper•25m ago•0 comments

The Happiness Crash of 2020

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6465460
1•paulpauper•25m ago•0 comments

Thoughts on the SaaSpocalypse

https://www.davidbatey.com/blog/thoughts-on-the-saaspocalypse
1•davidlbatey•25m ago•1 comments

Bun OPDS Server for Xteink X4

https://github.com/rcarmo/bun-opds-server
1•rcarmo•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Spotlytt, Market your soft+technical skills to Hiring Team

1•pbs29•26m ago•0 comments

Anyone here attended dotJS/dotAI conferences in Paris?

2•blumebee•28m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Adult German men must request permission to leave Germany for more than 3 months

https://www.fr.de/politik/drastische-wehrpflicht-aenderung-maenner-die-deutschland-laenger-wollen-brauchen-genehmigung-zr-94248132.html
33•raffael_de•1h ago

Comments

The_suffocated•1h ago
Not all men, but all men over 17 and under the age of 45. This still seems draconian, though.
raffael_de•1h ago
Number of characters for the title is limited. And while I wouldn't necessarily call it draconian because after all somebody has to defend my country; it in deed comes as a shock. And it is also shocking that I just randomly stumbled over this news article when this law is in effect already for 3 months. How is it possible that our news talk about all sorts of nonsense but not about something as fundamentally relevant as this ... this is the real shock.
mnmalst•1h ago
I agree in general. One reason we haven't heard anything about it might be that the administration already admitted that this legislation needs correction or at least clarification, as mentioned in the article.
raffael_de•1h ago
No, that is not mentioned in the article. The correction and clarification is regarding how exactly this is being implemented. The law is there ... don't think this is a mistake. And there should be serious discussions in a society before something like that is made a law.
mnmalst•43m ago
Fair, yes I agree. Didn't mean to excuse anything they introduced.
kristianc•1h ago
Draconian law gets introduced, public outcry ensues. Oh okay we will make it six months then. This is how civil liberties get eroded.
uyzstvqs•54m ago
> And while I wouldn't necessarily call it draconian because after all somebody has to defend my country

The ends don't justify the means. Conscription has no place in the free world. It's slavery, plain and simple. Going into the military should be an appealing career choice. Our soldiers are supposed to be highly skilled professionals, not cannon fodder in large quantities.

raffael_de•46m ago
So, if some other country with different value system attacks your homeland with intention to effectively colonize it then you'd be okay with just letting it happen?
kiviuq•8m ago
I believe it is up to the free individual to make that decision. I'm not saving the slave ship when I'm treated like one.

ps: There are 8 billion people on this planet, and I've never had any serious issues with any of them, much less a reason to start a war. Governments are always the cause of everyone's misery. Beware of yours!

haukem•51m ago
I am also surprised that I haven't read about this in German news before. I am following the news. If Trump would have signed an executive order with a similar content affecting US citizen, German media would probably report about this multiple days long with many articles.

I was looking in Google news for other reports about this, but only found an article from Berliner Zeitung published 5 hours after this article from Frankfurter Rundschau.

I am worried about what other information which could be important to me, the news did not report on.

As far as I understood the law the article from FR is correct: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/wehrpflg/__3.html

nwellnhof•37m ago
The law says all men aged 17 and older, not military-aged.

https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/wehrpflg/__3.html

klausa•1h ago
That seems more “oh we fucked up and didn’t realize our changes to the law imply this” than “Germany forces men to request permission to leave”.
raffael_de•1h ago
Highly doubt it. This is a very new addition. Their fuck up was to pretend for ideological reasons that a country doesn't need an army. And that the concept of considering a country home and its culture as something worth preserving is just right wing bs. Now they are surprised that only very few men deliberately registered for armed service ...
klausa•1h ago
We’ll see, I guess.

The quotes very much read to me like someone realizing what the change of Paragraph 2 means to Paragraph 3 means in real time and having to figure out what to answer to journalists.

I’m curious how that would work administratively though - would they require you to have that when trying to do Ausmeldung? And what about those who moved out before this law got changed?

Technically, do I need to go Bundeswehr office when I come back next time, to get the permission?

I _want_ to believe if this was a deliberate change that someone cared about; we wouldn’t be having this discussion right now because there would be clear answers to the very obvious questions here, but maybe my hope is misplaced.

raffael_de•1h ago
I'm not sure you understand how laws are made. It's not like "ooops a new law, who did that?" It's going through all sorts of processes with lots of people involved. And even if this is just an "innocent mistake", well, that would mean our government is run by a bunch of incompetent morons ...
i_have_to_speak•1h ago
Are homo sapiens the only species that organizes themselves into tribes and work towards the destruction of other tribes of same species?
raffael_de•1h ago
That is how some people make a lot of money.
Simulacra•1h ago
Weaver ants
rement•1h ago
No, Chimpanzees also have tribes and fight over territory

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gombe_Chimpanzee_War

i_have_to_speak•1h ago
TBF that is an isolated incident, not a distinguishing trait of a species.
delecti•33m ago
Not even close. Territorial disputes are incredibly common in nature. Humans are relatively rare in that we're capable of understanding that depriving competitors of resources will eventually lead to their deaths, but that is the ultimate result of winning a territory dispute in nature too.
keysersoze33•1h ago
Being 46 (and quite an active 46 year old, just finished a Skitour), am curious why the cutoff for these things tends to be 45?
raffael_de•1h ago
There has to be some cutoff and I assume it's for law historic reasons, maybe other related laws reference that age.

Cynically speaking: the people making those laws probably don't want to be impacted by it. And Germany is effectively a gerontocracy.

spwa4•46m ago
Let's see ... On December 5, 2025 the German parliament passed a law requiring all men between 18 and 45 years to register "for military service", which everyone should fully understand to mean to register for conscription.

Oh and they've added a very political clause: the government can activate conscription WITHOUT a parliament vote. So most political parties who have voted in favor of conscription want to be able to claim "it wasn't us, it was Merz" (ie. CDU). In reality CSU and SPD have voted to effectively conscript German men between 18 and 45.

In other words, Germany expects to be in open war in a matter of months to years. Like every country before them they've decided young men are cheaper than actually investing in military equipment (they're investing in military equipment, but they just won't have it in that time period)

This probably means that if you can get out, get out, because it's not like being 46 years old will protect you from the impact of that, and yes it's not clear what the timing is going to be, and they're not being very forward about what the reason is for conscription.

So that's why 45. Because the existing conscription law (1954 + 2025) allows for conscripting every German male between 18 and 45.

inhumantsar•33m ago
diminishing returns. people over 40 heal less quickly, start to run into chronic health issues, and are more likely to have suffered permanent injuries. it's easier to set a global cutoff at an age where the probability that any given person will be unable to do the job safely than it is to assess each person individually.
raffael_de•25m ago
I wouldn't survive a week at the front just because of my back. But I'll happily catch a couple of bullets.
randomNumber7•1h ago
I kind of predicted this a long time ago. They way germany is currently run they will need to act like the DDR and force their people to stay.

Otherwise everyone with good education will leave.

raffael_de•1h ago
that's a sad fact.
raffael_de•58m ago
who downvotes has to explain why. should be general requirement in my opinion. no downvotes without a comment explaining why. (@dang)
AnimalMuppet•11m ago
That is not the general policy of HN, nor the general culture here. You may say that you think that should be the culture, but it's not.
Jamesbeam•42m ago
This headline is kind of misleading.

First of all, there is no process yet for exactly requesting permission, secondly, the army already said they will not enforce the rule unless the Parliament declares combat readiness is necessary, and lastly, there is no punishment for not asking permission at this point in time.

And to be completely honest, if more people made use of registering for the damn ELEFAND emergency contact list, this rule wouldn’t be necessary in the first place.

So, men are kind of responsible for this themselves by being lazy.

I had to help exfil Germans in Kabul when the US decided to pull out without telling all of their partners in time.

Everyone wanted to be rescued, but you have no idea how many German idiots travel to foreign countries, not even taking five minutes to let their own government know how to reach them and where they went in case of an emergency.

It’s super fun to drive around Kabul and pick up 55 years old complaining male Germans yelling at me because I told them I transport people, not their fucking luggage. Two even sued me afterwards for leaving their expensive camera equipment behind. A dozen complaints about my behavior.

Sometimes it’s really annoying to protect the average citizen. Luckily, I understand that it is an extreme situation for them. Just like some people sue nurses after they broke their ribs reviving their dead ass.

It’s a good thing all these idiots now have to ask for permission in the future and likely need to leave the data necessary so it’s known where they are, for how long and how to reach them.

raffael_de•35m ago
just want to point out you started at this headline is misleading and meandered to agreeing with this being a law now and it was made for a reason and it will be enforced sooner or later. and that's effectively the headline + you think it's a good thing.
Jamesbeam•25m ago
Thank you, I suspect the _de in your username means you are German or German-speaking?

A friend from the US sent the link to this thread to me, asking about it.

The source website has no ability to be switched to English language, so all information my friend got was from the headline, which without context was misleading for him. If it was clear people wouldn’t ask German-speaking friends to explain this to them, don’t you think?

And if we are really precise, right now German men don’t need to request permission, because there is neither a process nor any paperwork in place to request permission.

Without being able to see and understand the context, the headline on its own is misleading in my opinion.

Just do an experiment for yourself.

Take the original transcript from any trump speech during the Iran war and put it in a German translator. You will understand it’s about the Iran war but you will be surprised how insane those speeches sound if you are not able to understand English and rely on Google Translate to understand the context.

raffael_de•13m ago
I get your point, I'm not agreeing ... anyway, there are plenty of tools available to translate text from German to English.
raffael_de•30m ago
I'm surprised this news is stalling at 24 points. Everybody has to understand that even if this law isn't impacting you; this is a signal in the noise. Germany is a major part of the industrial military complex together with the US and still the 3rd largest economy in the world after US and China. This is meaningful as it sets course for war in Europe. And for Germans it means soon to be enforced limitations of civil rights. That fits right in with the surveillance crap that is being attempted to roll out in EU (which is effectively headed and controlled by Germany).
mcculley•29m ago
If the U.S. implements a draft, would we first implement exit visas?
5555624•19m ago
If the U.S. implements a draft, will women be required to register? Right now, only men are required to register with the Selected Service when they turn 18. Would Congress amend the Military Selective Service Act?
mitchbob•15m ago
https://archive.ph/FWcWX
haukem•2m ago
The article 3 of the Wehrpflichtgesetzes says this:

> (2) Männliche Personen haben nach Vollendung des 17. Lebensjahres eine Genehmigung des zuständigen Karrierecenters der Bundeswehr einzuholen, wenn sie die Bundesrepublik Deutschland länger als drei Monate verlassen wollen, ohne dass die Voraussetzungen des § 1 Absatz 2 bereits vorliegen. Das Gleiche gilt, wenn sie über einen genehmigten Zeitraum hinaus außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland verbleiben wollen oder einen nicht genehmigungspflichtigen Aufenthalt außerhalb der Bundesrepublik Deutschland über drei Monate ausdehnen wollen. Die Genehmigung ist für den Zeitraum zu erteilen, in dem die männliche Person für eine Einberufung zum Wehrdienst nicht heransteht. Über diesen Zeitraum hinaus ist sie zu erteilen, soweit die Versagung für die männliche Person eine besondere – im Bereitschafts-, Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall eine unzumutbare – Härte bedeuten würde; § 12 Absatz 6 ist entsprechend anzuwenden. Das Bundesministerium der Verteidigung kann Ausnahmen von der Genehmigungspflicht zulassen.

See: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/wehrpflg/__3.html

This was not changed.

The article 3 of the Wehrpflichtgesetzes was previously only active in a war or close to war situation (Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall). Article 2 said this before:

> § 2 Geltung der folgenden Vorschriften

> Die §§ 3 bis 53 gelten im Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall.

See: https://github.com/bundestag/gesetze/blob/master/w/wehrpflg/...

Now it says this:

> § 2 Anwendung dieses Gesetzes

> (1) Die nachfolgenden Vorschriften gelten nach Maßgabe der folgenden Absätze.

> (2) Die §§ 3 bis 52 gelten im Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall.

> (3) Außerhalb des Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfalls gelten die §§ 3, 8a bis 20b, 25, 32 bis 35, 44 und 45.

> (4) Die §§ 15a und 16 sind nur auf Betroffene anzuwenden, die nach dem 31. Dezember 2007 geboren sind. Satz 1 gilt nicht im Spannungs- oder Verteidigungsfall.

See: https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/wehrpflg/__2.html

This law changed it: https://www.recht.bund.de/bgbl/1/2025/370/VO

Is the a up to date git repository with all German law changes? The one I found was last updated 4 years ago.