… and then …
“The binding constraint on Hormuz was never a minefield or insurance. It is the US Navy’s willingness and ability to reopen it.”
What is happening instead is that Iran is making agreements with various countries to let their ships through. These countries stand to lose it all again in case of a US attack, so they have an interest in trying to stop it.
Make Europe jump to another more solid economic and defense ally? Increasing even further the difficulties to do a preemptive attack?
The whole thing is a whole mess. Why didn't they seized the strait first? Why didn't they secure pathways to their own control first?
I see that not telling any of the allies first was a strategic decision with consequences for decades to come. If not attacking European and Asian economies was not the main goal I can't comprehend what was even the plan.
Or would the plan be creating the scenario for another world war? That is even stupid as it only made the other economies attack to want to retaliate hard. And on the other side would be everyone else with nuclear weapons. The only outcome would be the end of the world.
(To be fair, all mega rich have built super bunkers)
Occam's razor might well describe actions of a cold calculating leader. But of Trump..?
The damage of loosing even 1 carrier is much much higher than 20 years ago because of this. But US force itself to play this unfavorable game that its enemies can not even dream about.
https://gcaptain.com/controlled-passage-first-ships-edge-thr...
jgalt212•3h ago
The Hormuz Hypothesis – What If the U.S. Navy Isn’t in a Hurry to Reopen the Strait?
eqvinox•1h ago