frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

A Conversation with Paul Masurel, Creator of Tantivy

https://www.paradedb.com/blog/tantivy-interview
1•jamesgresql•1m ago•1 comments

Factoring is not a good benchmark to track Q-day

https://bas.westerbaan.name/notes/2026/04/02/factoring.html
1•fanf2•2m ago•0 comments

Rocq 9.2.0 Released

https://rocq-prover.org/doc/v9.2/refman/changes.html#version-9-2
1•baruchel•3m ago•0 comments

AI Company Clones Musician's Voice, Then Copyright-Strikes Her Own Songs

https://rudevulture.com/ai-company-clones-musicians-voice-then-copyright-strikes-her-own-songs/
3•doener•6m ago•0 comments

Draw it yourself: Checking Trump's tariff claims a year later

https://www.reuters.com/graphics/USA-TRUMP/TARIFF-ANNIVERSARY/myvmybzwbvr/
2•giuliomagnifico•6m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Open-Source Higgsfiled AI Alternative

https://github.com/Anil-matcha/Open-Higgsfield-AI
1•Kumar963•8m ago•1 comments

Oneness Is All You Need

https://www.birkey.co/2026-04-05-oneness-is-all-you-need.html
1•signa11•8m ago•0 comments

Why your new computer is SLOWER than your OLD computer [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t992ul_IKtc
2•tiernano•11m ago•0 comments

Ask HN: How do you get feedback for your products?

1•asim•11m ago•1 comments

Show HN: GifForge – A 2.2MB privacy-first iOS Video to GIF tool

https://apps.apple.com/cn/app/gifforge/id6761457073
1•wangbaobaoOi•13m ago•0 comments

Telegram's AI Silently Rewrites Your Political Opinions. I Extracted the Proof

https://medium.com/@metraoklam/extracting-system-prompt-model-identity-from-telegrams-ai-feature-...
3•armalko•15m ago•1 comments

LLM may be standardizing human expression – and subtly influencing how we think

https://dornsife.usc.edu/news/stories/ai-may-be-making-us-think-and-write-more-alike/
3•giuliomagnifico•15m ago•0 comments

Milla Jovovich's MemPalace Claims 100% on LoCoMo. Its Benchmarks.md Disagrees

https://penfieldlabs.substack.com/p/milla-jovovich-just-released-an-ai
3•dial481•16m ago•0 comments

Modolap – Codex-Native OLAP Service

https://www.modolap.com
1•ronfriedhaber•16m ago•0 comments

Fabian's Arena

https://matthewculnane.co.uk/posts/fabians-arena
1•paulcapewell•17m ago•0 comments

Show HN: LookAway 2.0 – a break reminder for Mac that respects what you're doing

https://lookaway.com
2•_kush•18m ago•0 comments

A filtered SaaS stack for solo founders – no paid placements

https://curated-software.deals
1•Chartysan•19m ago•1 comments

Show HN: Serif.sh – it's like ray.so for quotes (Open source)

https://github.com/ticketping-com/serif-sh
1•raviojha•20m ago•0 comments

Russia blocks messengers and VPNs – and its banks too

https://www.heise.de/en/news/Russia-blocks-messengers-and-VPNs-and-its-banks-too-11246142.html
3•doener•22m ago•1 comments

C3 0.7.11: closing out the 0.7 series before 0.8

https://c3-lang.org/blog/c3-0-7-11-the-last-v0-7/
3•lerno•22m ago•1 comments

Betting on a code-first approach to privacy

https://www.openpolicy.sh/blog/code-first
3•vr46•23m ago•0 comments

Semantic HTML Just Might Make Your CSS Less Fragile

https://schalkneethling.com/posts/semantic-html-just-might-make-your-css-less-fragile/
3•speckx•24m ago•0 comments

Trojans in Firefox extensions is MUCH more common than you think. Deep dive

https://www.yourdev.net/blog.php?post=extension-malware-in-the-wild
5•ernos•25m ago•1 comments

StructuredTaskScope beyond toy example dependency-aware kernel bootstrap in Java

https://blog.arkstack.dev/en/blog/structured-task-scope-beyond-toy-examples/
1•arkstack•26m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Mailmap-checker – Pre-commit hook for Git identity consistency

https://github.com/cansarigol/mailmap-checker
1•cansargl•27m ago•0 comments

No "New Deal" for OpenAI

https://minutes.substack.com/p/no-new-deal-for-openai
2•jger15•27m ago•0 comments

An Actual Alternative to Originalism

https://www.scotusblog.com/2026/04/an-actual-alternative-to-originalism/
2•Tomte•32m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Stop paying for Dropbox/Google Drive, use your own S3 bucket instead

https://locker.dev
4•Zm44•32m ago•0 comments

Built $5M. Got 1%. Got let go

2•mhrnik•33m ago•2 comments

Show HN: Procurement.txt – a robots.txt for AI purchasing agents

https://www.procurementtxt.org/
2•imcqueen•34m ago•1 comments
Open in hackernews

Iran threatens OpenAI's Stargate data center in Abu Dhabi

https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/907427/iran-openai-stargate-datacenter-uae-abu-dhabi-threat
47•marksully•2h ago

Comments

mikkupikku•1h ago
Oh no!

...anyway... Seriously bros, this is a war where one side is making wildly inflammatory, specific and credible threats against the civilian infrastructure of the other and this is a response to that, hardly even a response in kind. If they strike these assets it will cause financial burden for rich people, not plunge millions of civilians into darkness as the POTUS is credibly threatening to do.

Iranian attacks on US soil: Fuck all! So why is America fighting Iran? Insane ziofascist cultists picking fights on the other side of the planet to provoke the Apocalypse so they can all be raptured to paradise. (Translation: boomers are getting old and they want to see burning flesh one more time before they die.)

graemep•1h ago
Iran has threatened to destroy water supplies in the Gulf states, which would kill huge numbers of people.
cineticdaffodil•1h ago
Not only threatened it did some "teststrikes"
mikkupikku•1h ago
After America attacked them, sure, and in any case they aren't even attacking America, so again, why is America involved?
21asdffdsa12•1h ago
Because Iran attacks them relentlessly by proxxy? Hoothis, Hezbullah, Hamas, etc. It also wars with the kurds and had some fun in afghanistan?

Iran is not passive - iran is active, a wannabe us (lets call it micro-satan) - that wants to do what russia did along its borders.

mikkupikku•1h ago
> Because Iran attacks them relentlessly by proxxy? Hoothis, Hezbullah, Hamas, etc

Iran doesn't use any of these to attack America. You seem to be confusing Israel for America, a common problem in American politics.

21asdffdsa12•1h ago
The us is the peace guarantor for maritime trade in the region. Its the protector of several oil powers. When the hoothi shoot on ships, they hit the us.
poisonarena•1h ago
The navy anti-drone team on my last 2 ships in the merchant marine would argue differently
gryzzly•1h ago
Iranian proxies are responsible for well over 1,000 American deaths since 1979, and there were dozens of foiled plots on American soil and hundreds of individual militia attacks in Iraq and Syria, directed by Iran.
kdheiwns•59m ago
For reference, how many times has the US interfered with Iran's government and how many people in Iran has the US killed since 1979? That's the only way to get a fair view of this discussion. Just wondering if all this happened in a vacuum or, god forbid, Iran maybe has some reason to dislike the US.
gryzzly•54m ago
this was a reply to people saying "Iran is not attacking the US". It is of course convenient to bend this discussion into a different direction, but this was a reply to blind propaganda that sees only one side as responsible for bad things.
akdev1l•34m ago
“What about…?” Does not make for a good argument.
srean•41m ago
[To the downvoter, downvoting is not going to change the historical facts]

It was the US that upended Iranian parliamentary democracy with a military coup, sponsored chemical weapons attacks on Irani population (through its proxy Iraq). This killed some 30k to 50k by way of chemical attacks alone. Credible sources estimate 100K killed by these chemical weapons attacks alone.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_chemical_attacks_against...

US shot down their passenger jet. US has imposed crippling sanctions that have decimated the economic well being of the country compared to what it could have been.

Iran Air Flight 655 was an international scheduled passenger flight from Tehran to Dubai via Bandar Abbas that was shot down on 3 July 1988 by two surface-to-air missiles fired by USS Vincennes, a United States Navy warship. The missiles hit the Iran Air aircraft, an Airbus A300, while it was flying its usual route over Iran's territorial waters in the Persian Gulf, shortly after the flight departed its stopover location, Bandar Abbas International Airport. All 290 people on board were killed. No apologies yet.

Talking about Iranian proxies alone is one-sided if you don't consider what US-Israel proxies have been doing to them. US Israel have inflicted 10 to 100X more Irani deaths than what Iran has done in retaliation.

You are either ignorant or deliberately underplaying that. Most likely the latter.

21asdffdsa12•2m ago
Only westerners can be bad actors or at all in historic events racism of the charts? It takes two to tango and iran is dancing its heart out.. and could have had the most peacefull life, if its religion would not involve destroying all "unbelievers" in the middle east - first and foremost aimed at israel.
curt15•35m ago
How many Russian deaths have been caused by US proxies in Ukraine so far? Do those justify an attack on the US by Russia?
vachina•1h ago
Still none of your business
baq•59m ago
Persian gulf is everyone’s business.
throwaway25231•1h ago
How about USA proxies? Or are proxy wars just reserved for other party?
igorramazanov•1h ago
My personal opinion is that, it's because with the previous political and cultural trends, West had (maybe still has) actually quite high chances of collapsing and falling in the long term due to its own indecisiveness, lots of words mixed a lack of actions against coordinated and targeted efforts of Russia, Iran, Venezuela, Belarus, Cuba, China, Syria and North Korea.

I remember national state TV in Russia talking about "we are ready to nuke United States if needed" in 2014 [1].

So, domestically, government made sure people believe that the West is the mortal enemy and we were are already at some kind of cold war since Crimea annexation, it's just West didn't notice, seems like.

Then, there were also artifical immigration crisis at EU borders created by Russia and Belarus.

And many other various hybrid and asymmetrical attacks.

1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TA9mVLomYo8

So, USA recognized the danger and started dismantling the problem piece by piece, to ensure a long term peace and safety of its people. Could it be better organized and coordinated with allies? Probably, yes, but the meaning stays.

jurgenburgen•58m ago
> So, USA recognized the danger and started dismantling the problem piece by piece, to ensure a long term peace and safety of its people. Could it be better organized and coordinated with allies? Probably, yes, but the meaning stays.

By becoming part of the problem? Trump threatening to invade Greenland was a wake-up call for Europe. Actively supporting forces that want to tear down democracy in Europe isn’t particularly helpful either.

If we become like China and Russia then why is our civilization in any way better?

graemep•57m ago
If the west collapses it will be because of its internal problems. Inefficiency, bad government, inequality.

I think you are right that the West is complacent about its enemies because it cannot really shake the belief in its superiority that came from winning the cold war and dominating the world in the decades after, I just do not think that is the biggest threat.

gryzzly•1h ago
1979-1981 - Tehran, Iran — 66 Americans held hostage 444 days

1983 Apr - Beirut, Lebanon — 17 Americans killed (U.S. Embassy bombing)

1983 Oct - Beirut, Lebanon — 241 U.S. military killed (Marine barracks bombing)

1984 Mar - Beirut, Lebanon — 1 American killed (CIA chief Buckley kidnapped, later killed)

1985 Jun - Beirut, Lebanon — 1 American killed (TWA Flight 847 hijacking)

1989 Jul - Lebanon — 1 American killed (Col. Higgins murdered)

1995 Apr - Gaza Strip — 1 American killed (car bomb)

1995 Aug - Jerusalem, Israel — 1 American killed, 100+ wounded (bus bombing)

1996 Feb - Jerusalem, Israel — 3 Americans killed, 3 wounded (bus bombing)

1996 Mar - Tel Aviv, Israel — 2 Americans killed (shopping center bombing)

1996 May - West Bank — 1 American killed, 1 wounded

1996 Jun - Khobar, Saudi Arabia — 19 Americans killed, ~500 wounded (Khobar Towers)

1997 Sep - Jerusalem, Israel — 1 American killed, 7 wounded (mall bombing)

1998 Aug - Nairobi/Dar es Salaam — 12 Americans killed, thousands wounded (embassy bombings)

2001 Sep - New York/Washington D.C. — Iran facilitated transit of hijackers (2,977 total killed)

2002 Jan - West Bank — 1 American killed

2002 Jul - Jerusalem, Israel — 5 Americans killed (Hebrew University bombing)

2003 Aug - Jerusalem, Israel — 5 Americans killed (bus bombing)

2003 Oct - Gaza Strip — 3 Americans killed (diplomatic convoy bombing)

2003-2011 - Iraq — 603 U.S. troops killed (Iranian-backed militia IED/EFP campaign)

2011 - Washington D.C. — 0 casualties (assassination plot on Saudi ambassador foiled)

2019 Jun - Strait of Hormuz — 0 casualties (U.S. Global Hawk drone shot down)

2019 Sep - Saudi Arabia — 0 American casualties (Abqaiq oil facility drone strike)

2019 Dec - Baghdad, Iraq — 0 casualties (U.S. Embassy stormed)

2020 Jan - Ain al-Assad, Iraq — 100+ U.S. troops with traumatic brain injuries (ballistic missile strike)

2021-2022 - Iraq/Syria — ongoing U.S. base attacks by Iranian-backed militias

2023 Oct-Nov - Iraq/Syria — 60+ attacks in Iraq, 90+ in Syria; scores of U.S. troops wounded

2024 Jan 28 - Tower 22, Jordan — 3 Americans killed, 34+ wounded (drone strike)

2024 - Red Sea/Yemen — ongoing Houthi drone/missile attacks on U.S. naval assets

2024 Nov - United States — 0 casualties (Trump assassination plot foiled)

JumpCrisscross•1h ago
Would be stronger with a source. Otherwise, it feels on the border of being potential AI slop.
srean•37m ago
30K to 50K Iranians killed by chemical weapons attacks by US proxy, Iraq. Credible sources estimate 100K killed and 30K-50K is a conservative lowball estimate.

This is an active unhealed wound in Iran. Families of the dead still grieve those killed in cemeteries and graves that are there in almost all their major cities.

Iran has every reason to not like the US which has been destabilising and killing and crippling them economically for several decades.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraqi_chemical_attacks_against...

Iran Air Flight 655 was an international scheduled passenger flight from Tehran to Dubai via Bandar Abbas that was shot down on 3 July 1988 by two surface-to-air missiles fired by USS Vincennes, a United States Navy warship. The missiles hit the Iran Air aircraft, an Airbus A300, while it was flying its usual route over Iran's territorial waters in the Persian Gulf, shortly after the flight departed its stopover location, Bandar Abbas International Airport. All 290 people on board were killed.

No apologies have been forthcoming.

panja•37m ago
Interesting you started in 1979 instead of 1953
curt15•33m ago
History doesn't start in 1979. One can draw a direct line to those events from 1953.
SanjayMehta•1h ago
Oil.
JumpCrisscross•1h ago
> they aren't even attacking America

America never invaded Greenland. Nevertheless, we're facing blowback because we threatened it.

Iran has been chanting "death to America" for decades. That isn't casus belli. Not by a long shot. But pretending Iran hasn't been playing the part of belligerent for years is rewriting history.

ceejayoz•1h ago
Wasn’t that in response to Trump posting that he’d hit theirs?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/watch-live-hegseth-and...

> In a Truth Social post on March 30, Trump warned that the U.S. would obliterate "all of their Electric Generating Plants, Oil Wells and Kharg Island (and possibly all desalinization plants!), which we have purposefully not yet 'touched.'"

graemep•1h ago
It follows Trumps threats to destroy power plants, but predates the threat you quote. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/mar/22/iran-says-dest...

AFAIK there is no exemption that says it is OK to commit war crimes if the other side does.

If attacking power plants and oil production is a war crime, then Russia, Ukraine, and many other countries are guilty of it.

embedding-shape•1h ago
> AFAIK there is no exemption that says it is OK to commit war crimes if the other side does.

Of course not, but I still think the expectation that someone doesn't commit war crimes against you disappears relatively quickly when you're openly and proudly admitting you'll open to violating the rules of war and saying international humanitarian law doesn't matter.

nkrisc•1h ago
That may be so, but remember that Ukraine is fighting for its very survival, and Iran may be as well.
JumpCrisscross•1h ago
> Wasn’t that in response to Trump posting that he’d hit theirs?

It's Iran. They haven't been following international law since 1979. That isn't an excuse to commit war crimes against them. But Iran really doesn't have any legs to stand on when it comes to complaining about targeting civilian infrastructure–they and their proxies have been doing this for decades.

megous•58m ago
Just claiming something doesn't make it true. And also there's the whole scale thing.
JumpCrisscross•51m ago
> there's the whole scale thing

Sort of? I don't think that's really how war crimes work. Unless we're objectively in eye-for-an-eye territory, in which case we're not really talking about international law anymore. (To be clear, I think everyone talking about international law in this conflict is posturing. We've been collectively setting new norms for years, and between Russia, China and America, the rules seem to have inched closer to total war.)

curt15•43m ago
>They haven't been following international law since 1979.

History doesn't start in 1979. Why not go back to 1953? Overthrowing another country's elected government is no more conscionable under international law.

JumpCrisscross•1m ago
> Why not go back to 1953? Overthrowing another country's elected government is no more conscionable under international law

Nobody said you can't. I don't think the point is undermined. Neither the U.S. nor Iran have shown any consistent affection for international law.

pjc50•1h ago
Iran was having a water crisis before all this, to the extent of considering relocating the capital city away from Tehran's current location. Bombing Iranian water infrastructure will kill a lot of civilians, just as similar things happened in the Yemeni civil war (which Iran is a participant in). It's disheartening how much the prospect of mass murder is met with a shrug.
SanjayMehta•1h ago
And do you blame them? US behaviour in Iraq, Yugoslavia et al has always been to attack power stations and civilian infrastructure first.

The 47th war criminal in chief Trump and his Secretary of War(crimes) is making threats on TV and social media.

I would love to see the terrorist regime of Iran collapse but in this scenario, sorry, the US is completely in the wrong.

JumpCrisscross•56m ago
> do you blame them?

Blame is a weird word for geopolitics. I think Iran fucked up hitting those targets pre-emptively. Someone at home had to show their hard-liner boss that they were just as hard-line as he is. So they did something macho. The consequences be damned.

The mirroring of dysfunction on each side of this war is uncanny.

srean•48m ago
US-Israel struck Iran's desalination plants first.

Iran's targeting strategy has been a capability restrained tit for tat, for the most part. This is true except for attacks on other gulf states right after US-Israel decapitation strike.

megous•47m ago
You seem informed. Why did they do so? And what motivated them?

Sounds like a thing a state would not want to do to their neighbor out of the blue.

stavros•1h ago
The US really pulled a Russia with this "special military operation".
b65e8bee43c2ed0•1h ago
both wars are equally unjustified, but the US has lost what, <20 people by now, in over a month? Putin loses >20 people per hour of his war.
OwlsParlay•1h ago
Trump has avoided a ground invasion up to this point for this exact reason, even trying to take one of outerlying islands would have heavy casualties due to drone warfare. There's speculation that the mess over the weekend was the result of a SOF mission gone wrong.
matusp•1h ago
Russia is actually gaining people in this war. The occupied territory they intend to keep has a prewar population of 10M.
krige•59m ago
That would be true if they were keeping the native population there alive. We know they were importing presumably loyal people from deep Russia. What happened to original occupants? You can guess.
stavros•1h ago
I'd say "I agree, the US should lose more people" but I wouldn't wish casualties on anyone.

Still, the fact that the US can kill people without any cost because they send drones to do it doesn't sit well with me at all.

pjc50•7m ago
In fairness, Iran has also been conducting its campaign with missiles and the Shahed drones. The Iran-Israel war has killed a lot of people who are neither Iranian nor Israeli but happen to live in Palestine or Lebanon.
stavros•5m ago
Yeah I don't really like having to defend Iran, so I don't know what to tell you. Nobody in this is right.
SanjayMehta•1h ago
Nonsense.

Look at the body exchange ratios. Russia exchanges 20+ bodies for each received from The Ukraine. X and Telegram channels are full of videos of freshly dug graves in The Ukraine.

Mediazona (a BBC propaganda arm) tracks obituaries in Russia and even a blatantly biased outlet is unable to prove such assertions like 20 people per hour.

Edit: since Hypocrisy News is rate limiting me I can't reply to the redditor asking for a source:

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cg7ed4rp7x5o

JumpCrisscross•1h ago
> Russia exchanges 20+ bodies for each received from The Ukraine

Source?

rainworld•58m ago
https://kyivindependent.com/ukraine-repatriates-bodies-of-1-...

1000 Ukrainians for 38 Russians. Such exchanges with similarly lopsided ratios happen every couple weeks.

gambiting•54m ago
Maybe it's simply because Ukrainians aren't killing Russians within territory they control, so they don't have as many bodies to exchange. Looking at body exchanges to determine the number of dead people on either side seems just...like a weird metric?
JumpCrisscross•53m ago
Article says "Russia is likely handing over more bodies than it receives since its troops have captured more Ukrainian bodies than vice versa, since they have been on the offensive for most of the war."

That could be bullshit. But it holds water as a hypothesis. If Ukraine were suffering 20:1 casualty ratios against itself on the field, Russia would have won already. There are no weapons that can overcome a small belligerent losing more bodies than the larger one.

pjc50•4m ago
This is a rather grim comment, but: when a war is fought with 155mm shells, over 100k per month, that doesn't necessarily leave bodies.
gambiting•55m ago
>>from The Ukraine

It's just Ukraine. Unless you're doing this on purpose.

>>and even a blatantly biased outlet is unable to prove such assertions like 20 people per hour

https://www.csis.org/analysis/russias-grinding-war-ukraine

It seems to hover around 30k dead a month recently, so 1000 people a day, divided by 24, that's actually ~41 people an hour.

But you know, even if we assume these numbers are wildly innacurate and only half those given...that's still 20 per hour?

>>X and Telegram channels are full of videos of freshly dug graves in The Ukraine.

No doubt, but what does that have to do with anything.

>>Edit: since Hypocrisy News is rate limiting me I can't reply to the redditor asking for a source:

So on one hand you call BBC a highly biased source, and then you link an article from it? So which one is it? Is it biased, or is it the source of your information?

bigfatkitten•51m ago
> The Ukraine

The fact you use this term makes it quite clear which side you’re speaking for.

JumpCrisscross•59m ago
> the US has lost what, <20 people by now, in over a month? Putin loses >20 people per hour of his war

Not sure why you're being downvoted. Russia's economy and military have been flogged by their war in a way America's has not. Moreover, we have midterms this year and a Presidential election in 2. Moscow has no similar 'fuck it' exit option.

mikkupikku•49m ago
The American people are already getting flogged when they buy fuel and groceries. The longer this war continues the worse it will get. Nonetheless, the American people themselves are mostly safe at home, the precedent for Iran launching any sort of attacks against the American homeland is basically nonexistent. Even sending terror cells, you'd think Iran would be on this for how often their western critics accuse them of funding terrorism, but in America? Crickets. This war is bullshit.
JumpCrisscross•4m ago
> American people are already getting flogged when they buy fuel and groceries

No, we're not. It's bad. But it's nothing compared to Russia.

ceejayoz•35m ago
Russia’s economy and military have been flogged for years to get to the current point. The US is just on month two.

The two powers have wildly different militaries and strategies. Comparing body counts is never gonna be a super helpful metric by itself.

JumpCrisscross•5m ago
> Russia’s economy and military have been flogged for years to get to the current point. The US is just on month two

Russia's military power has been vastly diminished by its war. If America committed to a ground invasion and then stuck with it through the next President, yes, we'd probably see similar degradation of American martial ability over years.

> two powers have wildly different militaries and strategies. Comparing body counts is never gonna be a super helpful metric by itself

Agree. But it does point to the extent to which one system will go to reduce loss of life.

PedroBatista•1h ago
Wait, are stargate data centers a real thing? I thought it was a financial/political vehicle to pump the markets and kick the can down the road.
richwater•1h ago
Can't believe the top comment in this thread is defending Iran by saying they only target wealthy people. The insane astroturfing of the web and TikTokification of the brain has impacted Hacker News.
poisonarena•1h ago
welcome to elite reddit
yanhangyhy•1h ago
its very smart move...for Iran. really <art of war> thing.