frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

Street Fighter 2026 Trailer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gX0Btbbddxk
1•havblue•30s ago•1 comments

Reed Hastings is leaving Netflix after 29 years

https://www.engadget.com/entertainment/streaming/reed-hastings-is-leaving-netflix-after-29-years-...
1•andsoitis•42s ago•0 comments

Helpful translations from British English (2015)

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/chart-shows-what-british-people-say-what-they-rea...
1•worik•1m ago•1 comments

Unicorn Market Cap 2026: SF Is the GenAI Super Cluster

https://blog.eladgil.com/p/unicorn-market-cap-2026-sf-is-the
1•gmays•3m ago•0 comments

Ollama v0.21.0-Rc0

https://github.com/ollama/ollama/releases/tag/v0.21.0-rc0
1•maxloh•3m ago•0 comments

Release PiClaw v1.8.0 – This Is Spinal Tap

https://github.com/rcarmo/piclaw/releases/tag/v1.8.0
2•rcarmo•4m ago•0 comments

Could AI's leading men become as powerful as Ford or Rockefeller?

https://www.economist.com/business/2026/04/16/could-ais-leading-men-become-as-powerful-as-ford-or...
1•andsoitis•5m ago•0 comments

New unsealed records reveal Amazon's price-fixing tactics, California AG claims

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/apr/16/amazon-price-fixing-california-law...
3•kmfrk•5m ago•0 comments

Data Science Weekly – Issue 647

https://datascienceweekly.substack.com/p/data-science-weekly-issue-647
2•sebg•6m ago•0 comments

First trailer released for western starring AI version of Val Kilmer

https://www.theguardian.com/film/2026/apr/16/first-trailer-released-for-ai-val-kilmer-western
2•bookofjoe•6m ago•0 comments

Visualizing 100k prime numbers in 3D

https://joshumax.github.io/beautiful-prime-numbers/
1•joshumax•8m ago•0 comments

Free instant WCAG 2.2 accessibility audit

https://webpossum.com
1•raphaelheide•8m ago•0 comments

How to Deconstruct Almost Anything (1993)

http://www.fudco.com/chip/deconstr.html
1•pocksuppet•10m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Tracking Top US Science Olympiad Alumni over Last 25 Years

https://www.perplexity.ai/computer/a/us-olympiad-tracker-__5Gzx3tQaKOInGlalN8sQ
2•bkls•11m ago•0 comments

A jury declared Live Nation a monopoly. But ticket prices won't drop just yet

https://text.npr.org/nx-s1-5787491
1•mooreds•13m ago•0 comments

The MacBook Neo Guide

https://randsinrepose.com/archives/the-macbook-neo-guide/
1•mooreds•14m ago•0 comments

Red hair&fair skin favored by natural selection last 10k years: vit D production

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2026/apr/16/red-hair-gene-favoured-natural-selection-study
2•bookofjoe•14m ago•0 comments

Guy builds AI driven hardware hacker arm from duct tape, old cam and CNC machine

https://github.com/gainsec/autoprober
10•scaredpelican•17m ago•1 comments

Worm's-Eye View

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Worm%27s-eye_view
1•signorovitch•19m ago•0 comments

Machine Learning Operations on ZYNQ FPGA Board for Real-Time Face Recognition

https://www.mdpi.com/2571-5577/9/4/71
1•PaulHoule•19m ago•0 comments

Objection – The AI Tribunal of Truth

https://objection.ai/
1•_DeadFred_•20m ago•0 comments

'Fireproof' batteries create their own internal firewall when the heat is on

https://newatlas.com/energy/fireproof-batteries-internal-firewall/
1•breve•20m ago•0 comments

A practical guide to Git worktrees

https://harness.mikelyons.org/guide.html
1•frenchie4111•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: Talk to all your agents in one place

https://github.com/Potarix/agent-hub
1•YoungGato•21m ago•0 comments

DuckLake 1.0 on MotherDuck

https://motherduck.com/blog/announcing-ducklake-1-0-on-motherduck/
2•tanelpoder•21m ago•0 comments

The Guitar Sounds New Again

https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/04/guitar-sounds-vg8/686807/
1•breve•21m ago•0 comments

IPv6 usage reaches historic 50% across Google services, matching IPv4

https://www.tomshardware.com/networking/ipv6-usage-reaches-historic-50-percent-across-google-serv...
1•smurda•24m ago•1 comments

The Dangerous Illusion of AI Coding [video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dHBEQ-Ryo24
1•indigodaddy•24m ago•0 comments

False or misleading statements by Donald Trump

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump
5•lr0•27m ago•1 comments

How a Non-Theorist and Two AIs Proved a Theorem

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=6591059
1•dmweinhold•32m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

The "Passive Income" trap ate a generation of entrepreneurs

https://www.joanwestenberg.com/the-passive-income-trap-ate-a-generation-of-entrepreneurs/
71•devonnull•1h ago

Comments

yoyohello13•1h ago
“Passive Income” is just the positive spin on rent seeking.
coredog64•45m ago
"Rent seeking" has a specific definition* and it is not "I use large capital investments to generate regular payments". Buying housing with the intent of renting it is not rent seeking.

This is Wikipedia, which is as good as most other definitions: Rent-seeking is the act of growing one's existing wealth by manipulating public policy or economic conditions without creating new wealth

valiant55•27m ago
In what way does buying a property and renting it create wealth? Isn't buying a property with the intent to rent it manipulation of economic conditions?
pc86•25m ago
If you think buying a house and renting it out "manipulates economic conditions" you need to prove it because that's a claim, especially with regard to "manipulate."
lotsofpulp•19m ago
The manipulation is in the political limit of housing supply and the limit on land value tax rates.
jeffbee•10m ago
The homevoter hypothesis is mostly nonsense. There isn't a coordinated, conscious effort to restrict the supply of homes based on rational expectations of excess returns. People restrict the supply of homes due to misguided aesthetic reflexes, racism, nostalgia, and a bunch of other stuff, not because they are mustache-twirling capitalists.
butterlettuce•21m ago
> Buying housing with the intent of renting it is not rent seeking.

That’s… that’s rent seeking.

And if you buy a house with the intent of renting it out, you’re a piece of shit.

jeffbee•19m ago
Why? There are loads of people who can afford to rent a house but can't afford to rent a million dollars. I genuinely cannot understand where this hatred of people who rent out houses comes from.
OrderlyTiamat•16m ago
Not necessarily. I rent my house, and the housing corporation who I rent from are not rent seekers, they provide a service to me which I'm happy with, and which they invest in.

They could've bought up the land and house and not improved it at all and depend on the housing crisis deepening for increased resell profit- but they did not do so, they maintained this house I'm in and ensured me and future tenants can continue enjoying this place. That's not rent seeking.

pdonis•8m ago
People who can't afford to buy a house need a place to live too. Believe it or not, there are people who buy houses with the intent of renting them out to those people, to actually help them.
em-bee•7m ago
i could not afford the capital investment to buy a house, and i am not interested, it would only lock me down. my family once bought an apartment. we lived there for a few years. the mortgage payments were twice as high as the rent would have been. when we moved out we were told the place could not be sold. the family still has the place and it is probably still empty. lots of money wasted.

when you buy a house with the intent to sell it for a profit, then you are driving up housing costs. i'd say that's even worse than renting it out.

michaelchisari•14m ago
There is rent-seeking, rent extraction and the rentier class. All are a part of the process of enclosure. Landlords are included in this but it may not seem that way because enclosure happened so long ago.
lotsofpulp•43m ago
I don’t think it’s even spin, it’s just the jargon the IRS uses. And wanting to make money while you sleep has been a thing long before 2015.
beloch•33m ago
Rent seeking is for those who already have capital and can use it to influence those with political power. "Passive income" is for those who don't own capital. One works. The other... often not.
jazz9k•1h ago
Passive income are just get rich quick schemes that were common decaded ago.

I started a business like this, but it wasn't passive. I shipped everything to my office before inspecting and shipping product out.

It lasted almost 10 years with 1 million annual revenue.

It was not passive.

Ifkaluva•34m ago
Sounds like you were running an import and distribution business. Not the same thing as drop shipping :) as the drop shipping people will joyfully tell you, “you’re not supposed to touch the product”
QuercusMax•15m ago
the inspection part is a big deal. drop shippers don't add any value, but inspecting the goods (and rejecting those that don't meet spec) actually adds value.
mrdependable•7m ago
Dropshipping is just logistics. There is a lot of dropshipping that has nothing to do with ordering off Alibaba.
faanghacker•1h ago
This article has a narrow definition of passive income, limiting it to these low-barrier-to-entry schemes. Other parts of the FIRE world have emphasized being a landlord or flipping houses, for example.

I personally made it happen by working a FAANG SWE job for 13 years, not getting sidetracked by the startup cult, saving and investing 70% of my after tax income, etc. And no I didn't get into crypto, but I still managed to make it with conventional investments.

In fact, I chose to pursue a career in the tech industry in order to pursue financial independence in the first place. Because I knew back then (circa 2005) all the tech Kool aid was BS. That "don't be evil" was just a facade. And time has proven me right and my haters wrong, those who thought it was unethical for me to place wealth building ahead of career building.

It's been four years since I've been out of a job. Now I'm creating more passion oriented content. I'm never bored.

paulpauper•37m ago
This is the way. There is huge survivorship bias when it comes to start-ups, even AI start-ups. When it comes to wealth creation, it's hard to beat a 20-30% CAGR with big tech stocks since 2010 or so, which was doable.
HeyLaughingBoy•31m ago
> thought it was unethical for me to place wealth building ahead of career building

Twelve year olds?

faanghacker•11m ago
High achieving college students.
zem•15m ago
> those who thought it was unethical for me to place wealth building ahead of career building.

that might well be the first time I've seen "career" and "ethical" conflated in that way. I've definitely seen the people who think you're a fool and possibly a sucker if you chase short term wealth over career stability, and there's definitely a veneer of unethicalness clinging to the notion of get-rich-quick, but I cannot understand how "establish yourself in a career" is an ethical concern.

georgemcbay•59m ago
"Passive Income trap" wantrepreneurs haven't really gone away, they have just shifted to crypto rug pull culture and now prediction markets and app-based gambling.

They'll keep existing as long as the root cause that creates them (massive wealth inequality in general and the growing delta between productivity and wages) exists, so probably until our financial systems fully collapse in about 2032.

ryandrake•31m ago
These people migrate like geese through the exact same stuff. I knew a couple of people way early on into affiliate marketing, then they all migrated to LeadGen, then to Drop Shipping, then online poker, then crypto, then NFTs, and now of course, they're all doing AI gigs. It's the exact same group of people migrating like birds from scheme to scheme.
secretsatan•54m ago
Met a guy that ran some dropshipping thing in a bar once, once he found out i was a programmer he kept on trying to get me to fix his website for free because it was easy, would not take no for an answer. I just kept upping how much money i would charge him till i got sick of it and left.

I knew a few guys like that in crypto too, before crypto came along and they got into that, this guy told me he’d written a twitter app, it was a bot that pumped gold at some influencers command. Spurred me to write an app though.

nobleach•38m ago
"My nephew makes websites, and he's 14... I could just have him do it"

- Every client of mine during my contracting days. It took me way too long to reply with, "Oh that's great news! I wasn't sure of my availability, and was certain I was going to be way too expensive. Glad you got it figured out."

cucumber3732842•48m ago
Everything I'd want to do on a "side gig to iron out the kinks and then eventual business" basis is regulated to the point where that path is economically impossible and the only way to be in the black is to take out a big f-ing loan, quit your job and go all in on your new business. And it's not just me, all my buddies have this gripe. We've all got skills and experience and equipment outside our immediate careers and we'd like to use those to provide value to people but there's just no way to do that inside the rules and none of us our interested in risking our retirements operating outside them.

I just upped my retirement contribution and decided that the big evil BigCos can do all the value creating and the finance middle men can have their take.

I guess that's the reason everyone does the slumlord or VRBO thing.

mothballed•17m ago
Where I live out in the country there are a lot of people with those kind of businesses. They bring you the goods and services to/from in a truck. If you ask to look at what they have... they have no address and won't tell you anything more than their goods/services dropped from the sky. At that point, I don't try to probe further... if I am happy I would rather not know.
hannahstrawbrry•48m ago
"It was an ouroboros that had incorporated in Delaware and was running Facebook ads," is my favorite line I've seen in a minute, great read
zem•28m ago
my favourite bit was

8<------------

Free to do what? Sit on a beach, apparently. Every single one of these people wanted to sit on a beach. I've never understood this. Have they been to a beach? There's sand. It gets everywhere. You can sit there for maybe three hours before you want to do literally anything else.

8<------------

I laughed out loud when I read it, because it's so true.

ghaff•25m ago
I “retired” about a year ago. Back to actively doing some tech industry analyst stuff with some folks I know. Keeps me as busy as I care to be.
paulddraper•20m ago
I love the beach.

Living near the beach is nice.

You can sit on it, walk on it, swim on it, surf on it, run on it, fish on it.

Better than a cement sidewalk, IMO.

zem•8m ago
I love the ocean, but I have to confess I don't care much for beaches. sand gets everywhere.
michaelchisari•20m ago
Nature is wonderful because it will relax and center oneself while making it clear why we created civilization.
qurren•44m ago
> Free to do what? Sit on a beach, apparently.

Quite the opposite for me. I'd like to have freedom to work on things I want to work on without "paying rent", "paying medical bills", or "short term profitability" being a constraint.

entropicdrifter•35m ago
Yeah, I'm a musician and a certified audio engineer. I'd rather be writing and recording music than working for healthcare/mortgage costs
TremendousJudge•20m ago
yeah, but the guys selling the courses were/are all obsessed with being at the beach
bluefirebrand•9m ago
I'm pretty sure that being at the beach is really just universal marketing shorthand for "being somewhere that no one would ever expect you to even reply to emails from"
dlcarrier•4m ago
I went the lean FIRE route, and now work on whatever open-source projects I feel like, plus local in-person volunteer activities. It's a much better quality of life, even though my job had been enjoyable, the extra scheduling flexibility is really nice.
quercusa•39m ago
Got trapped in an Amway pitch in my teens and have been inoculated against such things ever since.
pc86•27m ago
I wish Amway was bigger so more people would be exposed to it and be similarly inoculated.
slyall•15m ago
Well it was bigger. But the people who used to get swept by MLMs are now selling drop-shipping, affiliate websites or blockchain.
bluGill•11m ago
At least amway has real product. You are expected to sell to make money in the early years. In 30 years of real work you get a passive income retirement plan - but you need to put in real work selling things to get there.

when you look at the real business model of those who have had success they are still selling the soap in retirement. It is not going to get you rich, but it isn't too bad a life.

well it was - the only people I know in amway are in their 80s and so it may be different.

amway deserves the hate. Truth is it isn't as easy as they tell you.

homeonthemtn•39m ago
>But zoom out and what you had was just an enormous machine converting human ambition into noise.

Ah, the story of a generation

entropicdrifter•29m ago
Just one?
paulpauper•39m ago
Isn't passive income a cornerstone of of the Rich Dad Poor Dad Books? This long predates 2020. I would say selling masks and only being $800 in the hole is a lot better than starting a "regular business" and down $80k-800k.
wj•35m ago
You’re right. Books like the Four Hour Workweek and Escape From Cubicle Nation were guides to passive income twenty years ago.
ghaff•30m ago
It’s not totally risk-free income (but what is) but a decent pile invested sensibly makes for pretty good passive income depending on your goals.
bluGill•8m ago
now where do you get that pile to invest? I have a pile invested - but I'm close to retirement and it took me many years to save it up.
ryandrake•34m ago
Yes, it was the exact same scheme. Rich Dad Poor Dad was basically "Buy lots of cheap, crappy houses and become a slum lord" expanded into thousands of pages of books, seminars, and self help guides.
b00ty4breakfast•22m ago
I've been hearing about "passive income" for at least the last 10 years, and I reckon it goes back further than that.
Glyptodon•7m ago
My memory of RDPD was that it preaches getting assets which generate income, not that your management of those assets would be passive. Though obviously it also did have a subtext of "scale some kind of assets that generate income to a certain point and you can pay someone else to do more of the grunt work while you look into a new opportunity."
zem•20m ago
this is unquestionably the best thing I've read on hackernews this week, perhaps all this month. should be required reading in high school, for the mental lens it provides.
add-sub-mul-div•20m ago
It's like the flood of AI shovelware projects being spammed here daily.

Were these the people who were really going to do anything substantive anyway? Or just the shortcut-taking types?

bitwize•18m ago
"Passive income" as your only financial salvation is one of those memes that broke off from the MLM "tool scam" industry, that is, selling courses, seminars, and other training materials to people in MLMs on the pretext of teaching them sales, marketing, and business, but it's really just brainwash material designed to keep them from leaving. The other big one is positive thinking/the law of attraction/"The Secret". If MLM is the kaiju, these are the spider-things that fell off the Cloverfield Monster's body and started killing people in the subway tunnels. But like how Robert Smith performed with Siouxsie Sioux as "The Glove" while still fronting The Cure, these memes have built plenty of side scams while still enjoying friendly partnership with MLM itself.
vonnik•14m ago
“You can’t cheat an honest man.”

While that isn’t always true, honesty is a great defense against being enlisted in scams that promise easy money.

recursivecaveat•14m ago
I appreciated when "passive income" was the flavor of the week because it was a good signpost for people you could ignore. In particular anybody who didn't understand that you could assign a present value to future income, or that infinite series can sum to finite values. Seriously, the prototypical example of being an author is not particularly passive income lol! A book being print-on-demand indefinitely != infinite income. 99% of copies will almost certainly be sold within a few years, not least due to active marketing on your part. It's very likely to be a worse deal than getting paid a quite modest and disappointing sounding amount up front.
ghaff•10m ago
And that 4 figure advance from a publisher won’t go far either even if you earn it out and get a few royalties.
bluGill•6m ago
often the real value of writing a book is you can convince people to pay you to speak. I've had several classes at work where they gave me a book that had everything in the class.
sfRattan•3m ago
The way it shakes out is that there's no widely accessible way of escaping actual, ongoing work, which is what unmotivated people actually hear behind the words "passive income." Whatever the industry/vertical/field, a tiny number will hit it so big that they can actually stop working. Everyone else can bolster their income with passive sources, but that passive income ultimately depends on continuing new stimulus into the market (new products/services, more work marketing) to keep the "passive" flow stable.

If you look at the world of indie tabletop RPGs, for example: Kevin Crawford of Sine Nomine Press makes a very good living and a significant percentage of it is "passive" sales of his back catalog. But if he stopped publishing and promoting new game projects, sales of that back catalog would very likely shrivel to nothing within a calendar year.

The open-secret ingredient is always more work.

It's why someone like Crawford can afford to tell everyone exactly how he does what he does... Giving away extensive production files that show you his whole creative process, soup to nuts: 99% of people aren't going to put in the work necessary to sustain the passive portion of an individual income.

enraged_camel•12m ago
Side note: after drowning in LLM-generated content, it's pretty refreshing to read something written by a human. They're a pretty good writer, too!
dlcarrier•8m ago
Who needs LLM garbage when you have MLM garbage?
eek2121•5m ago
As someone who had actual passive income (small amount, a few hundred USD/mo) prior to my life being ruined by a medical accident: I agree (I killed my site because it was the right thing to do, I could not generate content for it because I couldn't function, so I did not want to waste the time/money of my users).

One thing the author does NOT see, however, is that the local folks doing all the hard work like mowing lawns, building furniture, etc. are in absolute panic over "AI" because their niche little lawn mowing/car washing/house cleaning business has been determined to be irrelevant by ChatGPT, etc. Oh and before you ask, there are folks claiming they can solve that exact thing, and those hard working folks are buying those products, hoping it will solve their downtrend in internet leads.

pdonis•4m ago
One thing in the article struck me as way too optimistic:

> What actually makes money hasn't changed. You find something people need. You get good at providing it. You charge a fair price and you keep showing up even when it's tedious and even when you don't want to. You build relationships over years. You build reputation over years.

You can make money doing this, yes--but most people who are really rich don't. There are lots of ways to game the system that don't involve the kinds of wacky things the article talks about.