Corrent me if I'm wrong, I'm not a security researcher, but 20 hours, a week of work, 2283$ spent and over 2 trillion tokens, is not very 10x-ing as we were promised. Especially if you take into account that the guy is at least half capable for this take.
I dunno
Go read the devs actual blog though. This is more a statement on patch lag than anything else. In my mind that’s much more important than “zomg zero days!!!”
Not really impressive
pingou•1d ago
Of course security by obscurity by itself is by no mean sufficient.
RadiozRadioz•1d ago
Open does not mean vulnerable, open simply means it's a more obvious cat-and-mouse game.
pingou•1d ago
iugtmkbdfil834•1d ago
- a lot of open source goes closed source to increase security - open source is effectively forced to use LLM to keep up
I am not really arguing against it, because I understand the arguments on both ends and I am not sure what a good solution here is.
whynotmaybe•1d ago
In the 90's most software was closed source but cracks/trainer were always available.
Even for Rayman that had multiple (26?) cd-check during the game.
Security is mainly slowing the attacker because there's a maximum amount of stuff a human can do in 24hours. But now if you can simulate thousands of human attacking a system in different ways, it will crack.
Just like many stores have lock on their doors and, insurance if someone breaks the lock.
I'm guessing data security insurance will become a huge market in the years to come.
pingou•1d ago