I tried it but all I hear is a choir of angels, is it broken?
medwezys•1h ago
I guess you’re working on a greenfield project?
AndrewVos•1h ago
Actually, that's not a bad idea!
greg_dc•1h ago
Honestly, I don't care about Opus 4.7. This is the true evolution of agentic coding.
8-prime•1h ago
Does this actually relate to the code quality being observed by the agent? The readme isn't very clear on that IMO. I have some projects I'd love to try this out on, but only if I am to get an accurate representation of the LLMs suffering.
So looks like it's mainly looking for FIXME/TODO etc comments, deep nesting, large files, broad catches, stuff like that.
AndrewVos•38m ago
I'm very open to suggestions, but currently it's a very simple scan of the code. Check the python scripts.
coldcity_again•58m ago
I really want this! Any chance of a Cursor version?
AndrewVos•30m ago
I just added a cursor plugin to the repo, let me know how it goes!
fredley•54m ago
I need a version of this which swears loudly when an assumption it made turns out to be wrong, with the volume/passion/verbosity correlated with how many tokens it's burned on the incorrect approach.
shivaniShimpi_•27m ago
i didnt realize i needed the volume scaling with tokens burned as much as i do now xD
imagine the screaming when it confidently refactors something for 40k tokens and then finds out the thing it deleted was load bearing
esperent•1h ago
medwezys•1h ago
AndrewVos•1h ago