frontpage.
newsnewestaskshowjobs

Made with ♥ by @iamnishanth

Open Source @Github

fp.

The AI Product Era You're Building for Might Be Over – Arcturus Labs

http://arcturus-labs.com/blog/2026/03/22/the-ai-product-era-youre-building-for-might-already-be-o...
1•softwaredoug•1m ago•0 comments

Remembering Seth Nickell

https://lwn.net/Articles/1070213/
1•chmaynard•1m ago•0 comments

GPT 5.5: The System Card

https://thezvi.substack.com/p/gpt-55-the-system-card
1•paulpauper•2m ago•0 comments

GPT-5.5: Capabilities and Reactions

https://thezvi.substack.com/p/gpt-55-capabilities-and-reactions
1•paulpauper•2m ago•0 comments

US to issue passports featuring Trump's picture to commemorate America's 250th

https://www.cnn.com/2026/04/28/politics/us-trump-passport
1•rawgabbit•4m ago•0 comments

Utah Planning Commission delays decision on Kevin O'Leary-backed data center

https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/utah-planning-commission-delays-decision-on-kevin-olea...
2•pera•4m ago•0 comments

The Church Rock Uranium Mill Spill

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Church_Rock_uranium_mill_spill
1•Sir_Twist•4m ago•0 comments

Pop-Up RSS

https://www.sourcefeed.app/
1•bjhess•5m ago•0 comments

The Robots Are Coming

https://steelforfuel.substack.com/p/the-robots-are-coming
2•simonebrunozzi•5m ago•0 comments

'Stole a charity': Elon Musk accuses Sam Altman of betrayal in courtroom

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2026/apr/28/sam-altman-open-ai-elon-musk-trial
3•tzmlab•5m ago•0 comments

Why JSON Schema matters more than ever in the age of generative AI

https://thenewstack.io/json-schema-ai-reliability/
1•chhum•5m ago•0 comments

Open-weight 27B hits 38% on Terminal-Bench 2.0 (Opus 4.1 hit 38% in Aug 2025)

https://antigma.ai/blog/2026/04/24/offline-coding-models
1•ubermon•6m ago•0 comments

Trump admin to pay 2 more companies to walk away from US offshore wind leases

https://apnews.com/article/trump-offshore-wind-energy-climate-interior-02a1fa04b750809bbe035a7025...
3•ceejayoz•6m ago•0 comments

C, Just In Time!

https://dyne.org/cjit/
2•smartmic•7m ago•0 comments

Why Matterbeam

https://blog.matterbeam.com/why-matterbeam/
1•mikepk•7m ago•0 comments

Show HN: SlopIt – A dead-simple CMS for your AI agent

https://slopit.io/
1•asenna•8m ago•0 comments

DOOM running in ChatGPT and Claude

https://chrisnager.com/blog/doom-runs-in-chatgpt-and-claude/
9•chrisnager•9m ago•1 comments

Tfdrift – Open-source Terraform drift detection with severity classification

https://github.com/sudarshan8417/tfdrift
1•sudarshan8417•9m ago•0 comments

Show HN: A DIY, MITM Keyboard Sniffer Built Around an RP2040

https://nlessard.online/projects/2040listener/
2•nlessard•10m ago•0 comments

Learning to Orchestrate Agents in Natural Language with the Conductor

https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.04388
1•Anon84•12m ago•0 comments

Sparse AI: Better hardware could turn zeros into AI heroes

https://spectrum.ieee.org/sparse-ai
1•4lx87•12m ago•0 comments

Ex-FBI Director James Comey indicted for his '8647' seashell post on Instagram

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/28/james-comey-indicted-trump-seashell-8647.html
1•koolba•13m ago•0 comments

Polymarket breach – 300k records exposed

https://twitter.com/DarkWebInformer/status/2049163029430870034
1•wildrhythms•13m ago•0 comments

I automated L2 support tired of handling escalations

https://www.lumen.support/how-i-automated-l2-support
1•miguelaeh•14m ago•0 comments

GitHub Copilot silently inserts itself as a co-author

https://github.com/orgs/community/discussions/194075
3•saikatsg•15m ago•0 comments

Humanoid robots start sorting luggage in Tokyo airport test amid labor shortage

https://arstechnica.com/ai/2026/04/japan-airlines-tests-having-robots-instead-of-humans-handle-tr...
1•speckx•19m ago•0 comments

Codex Rate limit reset April 28

https://community.openai.com/t/codex-rate-limits-reset-for-all-paid-plans-april-28-2026/1379921
3•thatxliner•19m ago•1 comments

Monitoring LLM behavior: Drift, retries, and refusal patterns

https://venturebeat.com/infrastructure/monitoring-llm-behavior-drift-retries-and-refusal-patterns
1•gmays•20m ago•0 comments

Show HN: HIC – Same-Ring Isolation, 4ns IPC, Runs on 8086

https://github.com/DslsDZC/HIC
1•DslsDZC•21m ago•0 comments

Implicit SLOs and their dangers (2024)

https://blog.relyabilit.ie/implicit-slos-and-their-dangers/
1•mrngm•21m ago•0 comments
Open in hackernews

Waymo in Portland

https://waymo.com/blog/shorts/waymo-in-portland/
100•xnx•1h ago

Comments

two-sandwich•36m ago
This is exciting! I wonder how they determine which cities are next in line? Probably regulation and governance?
grubbs•36m ago
I think Baltimore soon. Seen them testing around the city.
hdndjsbbs•33m ago
Wouldn't Baltimore be the first Waymo market that actually gets snow? I don't think they've cracked driving in a real Midwest/northeast winter.
tomwheeler•31m ago
> Wouldn't Baltimore be the first Waymo market that actually gets snow?

No, we have them in St. Louis and it snows a few times per year here.

hdndjsbbs•8m ago
Let me put it this way, I don't think they're operating in USDA Hardiness Zones of 1-5.

https://www.botanicalinterests.com/community/blog/usda-hardi...

davidw•30m ago
Portland gets very occasional snow. But they'll probably just shut the Waymos down along with everything else that shuts when there's snow and ice.
jrflo•27m ago
They're currently testing in Minneapolis and plan to launch in the next year to the public, so they seem to think they can crack tough winters
strictnein•18m ago
I really hope we're able to get them without the city council messing things up. The way they reacted to the news at first, you'd think Minneapolis was the first city to ever have autonomous vehicles. That, mixed with a heavy dose of "What about the buggy whip makers??"
derwiki•26m ago
They’ve been testing in Truckee, CA for years
grogenaut•23m ago
portland gets snow
lern_too_spel•22m ago
They're in Detroit, Denver, Minneapolis, and D.C.
Sleaker•20m ago
We do get ice and snow in Portland, along with flooding and landslides. No, it's not the same as Midwest, but we do get a few days every other year or so that you just don't drive out in. The black ice around a couple curvy sections of i-5 are notoriously bad at night in winters. (Terwilliger)
whoodle•23m ago
They’re being tested in Philly right now too
xnx•19m ago
Multiple factors: market viability, climate compatibility, capacity, and definitely regulatory factors. Currently DC, NYC, Boston and Chicago are all being slowed down by anti-Waymo groups like Uber drivers and public-transit lobbyists.
bojan•2m ago
Waymo is a sort of public transit. It's just an vastly more inefficient than any other form of public transit, but an order of magnitude more efficient than private passenger cars.
boc•33m ago
I've determined that my ultimate dream car would be something like a Rivian but with Waymo tech, so I can drive it manually when I want/need (snowstorms, off-road), but I can also let it drive me across the country at night while I camp in the back. Would absolutely change the way we move across the US, especially if you have hobbies that involve a lot of gear and equipment.
quux•31m ago
That's kind of a beautiful vision
ge96•29m ago
That would be something being asleep and waking up to a car crash
ticulatedspline•27m ago
reminds me of an old joke:

"When I go I want to die in my sleep like my grandfather. Not screaming and afraid like the passengers in his car"

Polizeiposaune•6m ago
The version I've heard a bunch of times had him as a bus driver..
derwiki•27m ago
Snowstorms are probably when I’d most want self driving. Back in February driving from Tahoe to SF, they closed the road, not because of conditions, but because too many impatient drivers spun out. I trust Waymo to go the recommended speed and not get impatient.
walrus01•17m ago
In a Canadian context, on a two lane highway, sometimes doing the absolutely safe/totally cautious speed in a moderate snowstorm will result in a very large collection of vehicles behind you, with angry drivers. In particular if the persons collecting behind you are some combination of not very risk averse, commute on the same road every day, and are very confident in themselves because they have dedicated winter purpose studded snow/ice tires on.

Even if you also have good winter tires on, if your level of "caution" could be best measured as normal to high, sometimes it's a judgment call on when you want to pull off to the shoulder for 45 seconds to let a bunch of vehicles behind you pass. I'm not sure this is something any automated driver has been configured for. Or just generally to deal with driving when the road condition could best be described as "two only partially visible ruts in the snow where the tires of previous vehicles have driven, with snow in the centre".

Same thing in somewhere with a climate like upper Michigan or in Maine.

smilekzs•10m ago
Turnouts exist. Unfortunately, head-of-line-blockers are very commonly already overwhelmed by the task of keeping tab of their own vehicle; would be a far stretch to expect them to simultaneously stay aware of traffic situations, spot the turnouts ahead, and then take the turnout.
rottencupcakes•13m ago
I drove up there in the AM Thursday, Feb 18th, during the snowstorm, about an hour before they closed the pass for the rest of the day.

You couldn't see anything. As soon as there wasn't a car 20 yards in front of you, it was a complete whiteout. Ice built up on the wiper as quickly as you could possibly reach out of your window and clear it. Radar would probably be nice, but I don't think it'd be enough to keep driving. The cameras and lidar would be an absolute wreck.

I'm sure we'll get there eventually, but that is really the final frontier for AI driving I think. Waymos aren't even allowed to drive in a snowstorm right now. I suspect that you'll be dealing with Caltrans closing the pass for the rest of your life.

radiorental•8m ago
Its not always about speed, This winter I was on interstate 93 in a 4WD with winter tyres. I was doing 25-35mph because the roads weren't treated. I still spun out, like many others. The road was an ice rink.

Humans and Control System Models need feedback to operate, and worse still... when any input into the vehicle's controls produce zero results, you will spin out.

My concern with a model in these conditions is that it wouldn't recoginize the fact that other cars were in the ditch and that it should probably slow down

SR2Z•2m ago
When it comes to controlling the wheels to prevent sliding and slipping, the AV control system is unbeatable. The ABS and traction control on a regular car has to cope with whatever control inputs the driver has made; on an AV, the vehicle models the grip limits of the wheel and plans a trajectory to not exceed them.

The main limitation is still sensors in the snow, but it seems to not be that big of a deal to build sensor packages that are better at seeing in the snow than a human is.

nico•5m ago
After skiing in Utah, I wonder why the driving conditions around Tahoe get so bad. In comparison, for most places around Salt Lake/Park City, you never need chains or 4-wheel drive.
xnx•25m ago
Yes. The longer-term possible second-order effects are going to be wild. Easier t o get to wilderness? Awesome!, but also crowding like you've never seen (but maybe also more small parks because there will be a glut of unused parking).
NitpickLawyer•11m ago
> something like a Rivian but with Waymo tech

So a Tesla?

smilekzs•1m ago
Off-roading aspirations and 3rd row legroom (S1) seem to be major differentiators from Rivian.

As for autonomy, Waymos have LIDARs which at least provides more redundancy.

I see these as different design tradeoffs so no judgment implied.

Silamoth•6m ago
At least 80% of what you’re describing would be satisfied by trains and buses. It’s wild that Americans are so obsessed with self-driving cars while ignoring public transit that solves most of the problems. It’s reliable, more efficient, better for the environment, and less stressful for you.

I’m not saying cars shouldn’t ever exist. The ‘last mile problem’ is a thing, and proper self-driving cars could be good for part of that (especially after a train and bus if you have lots of stuff). But you want to sleep in a vehicle with lots of storage space while driving across the country? That’s called a train. Nothing new needed.

pryanbeng•1m ago
Its the ultra independence mindset. I don't think trains work for the commenter you talked to.

I want to move on my schedule and convenience, I don't want to have to warp my day to day around someone else's departure schedule.

arnvald•33m ago
I wonder if at some point we'll see a hockey stick adoption of self-driving cars. For now every new city is worth a blog post, eventually they'll allow intercity drives. Will international adoption take off? Will I be able to use it on a country road to visit my family in 10 years?
tootie•16m ago
The inflection point will be cities building infrastructure and passing laws supporting self driving. Then it will hockey stick.
conductr•10m ago
I'd assume so. Even the city launches are extremely limited to a section of the overall metro area that one would consider necessary for full local service. They are dropping a lot of seeds and then will allow them to grow. While it seems very slow, I have always enjoyed watching Google's taxi service GTM approach much more than I did watching Uber's.
nickvec•9m ago
You can definitely see a bit of a hockey stick forming in Waymo's reported rides per week. Nice chart in this article. https://techcrunch.com/2026/03/27/waymo-skyrocketing-ridersh...
pavon•7m ago
If Waymo's announcements come to reality, that is happening this year. Phoenix entered full service in 2020, then San Francisco and Los Angeles in 2024, and Austin and Georgia in 2025 (in partnership with Uber). But this year they are planning on rolling out in 13 cities! Miami and Orlando are already in full service. Nashville, Dallas, Houston, and San Antonio are running invite-only service. Tampa, New Orleans, Minneapolis are in testing. San Diego, Detroit, Las Vegas and D.C. have been announced to launch this year, but haven't started testing yet. And that is on top of eight other cities that they are already testing in, but don't have timelines for offering full service.

That is already a huge jump from two cities a year.

Barbing•32m ago
Stiff competition for humans, especially drivers outside the top quartile or so. Waymo appears to its passengers to drive much more competently than certainly any sub-average rideshare driver.

Although I like jobs for humans, I hope these aren’t all just set on fire because there is promise in reducing fatalities. Want to find a way for offline vehicles that can go 65MPH to remain legal though. Without Flock every block either unless we (in USA) forget what the whole USA thing’s about.

Edit: @Waymo would LOVE to see an industry-leading privacy pledge so good the EFF slaps their logo on it (even caveated), also your engineers are amazing

georgeburdell•25m ago
Rideshare drivers can speed
dcre•12m ago
Is that supposed to be good?
fainpul•8m ago
YES!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6fm567YGy5c

nickvec•18m ago
Waymo undoubtedly drives better than your average rideshare driver - I have taken dozens of Waymos in SF and the experience is unmatched. Also no chance of being harassed by the driver, which is a big plus.
pkulak•16m ago
Are Waymos cheaper than hiring a person?
Kirby64•12m ago
Depends on the region, I think. Lyft and Uber partner with them in certain cities, so you transparently are charged the same as a similar ride with a human driver. It's only a better experience than a human driver, though, in my view. No chance of yapping, more privacy, no chance of your driver being a psycho, cars are better maintained.
walrus01•10m ago
It's hard to measure "cheaper" as an end user consumer, the price you pay for the service, because it's very likely they're operating at a loss to gain market share and growth.

Exact same reason why Uber and Lyft were considerably cheaper than taxis in many big cities when they first launched (eg: Lyft in Seattle in 2013/2014), running at a loss, and the pricing has now incrementally grown to become the same as, or even more expensive than traditional meter taxis in some places.

tristanj•9m ago
Waymo inflates their prices to be above that of Uber/Lyft because they don't have enough vehicles to meet demand. But their operating costs / mile are lower than that of Uber/Lyft. I'd estimate their internal cost per mile is approx. half that of Uber/Lyft. They pocket the rest because they need to recoup decades of expensive R&D.

There is also no reason to compete with Uber/Lyft on price because they are just leaving money on the table. When Waymo first launched, we saw them try to undercut (Waymo was about 20% cheaper than Uber/Lyft) but now it's about 20% more expensive. People are willing to pay extra for Waymo, so why would they charge less?

The margin on each Waymo ride is currently very, very high. I don't expect Waymo to cut prices until real competition arrives.

cheriot•6m ago
During peak hours Waymo is more expensive than standard uber/lyft - I don't pay attention to black/premium pricing. Off-peak the price can be comparable. I mainly check because my wife prefers it.
preommr•9m ago
> I hope these aren’t all just set on fire because there is promise in reducing fatalities.

Doesn't matter.

At this point, if the US doesn't lead, China will.

They have a massive population imbalance that they can only crawl out of with automation. Someone is going to have to drive around all those seniors. Once it's a proven model, it'll spread to the rest of the world.

tgsovlerkhgsel•4m ago
The one feature that Waymo has over other rideshare apps is that the cars presumably actually show up.

With all other apps, it feels like 50% of drivers just sit there waiting for you to cancel. I can't rule out that it's a bug with the app not showing updated locations in some cases (I've had an Uber show up even though the web app showed it three traffic lights away), but "actually gets me where I need to go in a timely manner" is a key feature and when "RIDE AVAILABLE, 3 MINUTES" turns into 7 minutes as soon as the app is done searching for a driver, and that turns into you having to cancel 5 minutes in and try again, the platform becomes useless.

zerotolerance•28m ago
I feel like this post and most (if not all these comments) are an ad.
lotsofpulp•25m ago
Self driving cars are such a huge quality of life improvement that people would advertise it for free.

I would rank it up there with mobile broadband and smartphones in terms of influence.

nickthegreek•18m ago
The amount of trips I would suddenly be interested in taking would skyrocket.
xnx•22m ago
My personal enthusiasm can come off this way, but I'm excited for it as a cyclist, someone whose brother was killed by a driver, and general cutting edge technology hobbyist.
pkulak•17m ago
Same here, as someone who doesn't drive much, and is generally a "vulnerable road user". I've seen Waymos drive. When they screw up, it's by stopping dead under an abundance of caution. They never speed. They can spot a ped or cyclist from blocks away. Every time I take an Uber home, the driver is guaranteed to drive 40+ on the 20mph road in front of my house while blasting through crosswalks with people waiting to cross. The data is not really in yet (still not enough miles to really say if they are safer), but they pass the eye test.

The rain will be a real test though!

nickthegreek•18m ago
People are interested as its a sci-fi promise long hoped to be filled. It is the first step to alot of other changes that will happen as higher majority of vehicles on the road transition to actual full self driving.
porphyra•25m ago
A Waymo was recently stuck on some light rail tracks in Phoenix this year [1]. Portland has a rather diverse bunch of streetcars and trams concentrated in its downtown core. Hopefully they don't get stuck on the tracks or block the trams.

[1] https://www.azfamily.com/2026/01/08/waymo-passenger-flees-af...

walrus01•22m ago
Definitely a big concern, but given the number of times in my lifespan that I've seen pictures or video of human-driven vehicles that have got stuck on railroad crossings (or just straight up drunk people trying to drive linearly down a railroad track)...

I would be curious to compare stats of 100,000 hours of human drivers getting stuck on grade crossings or doing something dumb, such as trying to drive around crossing barrier arms, vs 100,000 hours of automated driving. I would bet the automated driver does a lot better.

I recently saw a video from (I think not Phoenix) of 3 waymos that were next to each other blocking traffic in an intersection, refusing to move, because they were facing a traffic signal intersection where the signals had reverted to blinking red mode. Humans who paid attention when learning to drive will understand this means the intersection has reverted to a 4-way-stop due to the traffic signal failure.

The problem is that multiple red lights were blinking in view of the waymos not in sequence with each other, so the waymos interpreted it as a alternating-blinking red railroad signal crossing, and all of them refused to proceed, even when it was their "turn" in a 4-way-stop arrangement.

conductr•4m ago
> The problem is that multiple red lights were blinking in view of the waymos not in sequence with each other, so the waymos interpreted it as a alternating-blinking red railroad signal crossing, and all of them refused to proceed, even when it was their "turn" in a 4-way-stop arrangement.

What's the hot fix for this? Are they just stuck until a tech can physically go out and reset and move them? Or can someone in a office somewhere remotely get alerted, look at the video feed/data, and override it with instruction on how to proceed?

Silly stuff like this happens all the time even with human drivers, I feel like the important piece when hearing that the technology encountered an issue is how long did it take to resolve?

pkulak•21m ago
Well, that's the hope, but the bar is pretty low. Portlanders constantly block streetcars, usually by doing a shite job of parallel parking.
gcheong•19m ago
From the article it doesn't sound like it was physically stuck as much as it's maps might not have been updated with the latest addition of that light rail and/or it was confused by the ongoing construction.
jaredcwhite•24m ago
Nice, looking forward to all the, ahem, creative protest to be done on the robocars if they ever do show up here. heh
ortuna•22m ago
So, these streets are so tiny and pedestrians are used to just walking out on crosswalks because most people stop at crosswalks
jeffbee•17m ago
Every town says the exact same thing when Waymo shows up, and it's never true. There's nothing unique about Portland drivers, streets, sidewalks, or pedestrians.
arjie•15m ago
That seems like a dream environment for these cars. They are very good about waiting for humans to cross. To be honest, a Waymo at the front in an intersection means that it's going to be much more relaxing as a pedestrian or bicyclist crossing. This is especially true in intersections with a no-right-on-red where Waymos will obey but human drivers in San Francisco rarely do.
nickvec•7m ago
Waymo has no problem navigating the narrow streets of SF.
lraJah•20m ago
A population with more spirit to resist than SF. I wonder if they bring out the traffic cones.

What will they tell the unemployed drivers? "Coal miners need to code" doesn't work any more. Become a data thief/labeler perhaps?

Jblx2•6m ago
I wonder what percentage of people in Portland are resistors. Do they outnumber the homeless?
SunshineTheCat•14m ago
If they don't show up as green Subaru Outbacks with a bunch of bumper stickers on the back they'll stick out like a sore thumb.
well_ackshually•9m ago
The same Waymo that says that they don't give a shit that they're stopping in bike lanes because their selfish passengers pay for it? - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912645

Good luck to Portland getting fucked by Waymo.

nickvec•2m ago
Human drivers (especially Uber/DoorDash drivers) stop in bike lanes all the time without repercussion. Pointing the finger at Waymo for this doesn't negate the larger problem of it not being enforced by local traffic enforcement.
josefresco•4m ago
I wonder how long Google will continue to subsidize this at a substantial loss? Estimated $30–40 billion spent in the last decade that only really pays off if they dominate the market.
darquomiahw•3m ago
Why would anyone take a Waymo when you can ride the Trimet MAX for $2.50?